They think that most guys in SF/Silicon Valley dresses up like Mark Zuckerberg and Steve Jobs. No matter what survey or whatever list, if a certain group wants to find something against a certain city, 100% they will find one. Just depends on your bias and what you wanna see. Some people when they're holding a piece of paper with a small dot on it, see the paper. While the fashion critics see the small dot. You mean the people in Flagstaff, Arizona or Kalispell, Montana dresses up better than Vancouverites, no way on earth. :nod:
Vancouver #3 on MSN Travel's Worst-dressed cities in the world
- Thread starter Miss*Bijou
- Start date
Right. Because Kalispell (pop. 19927) and Flagstaff (pop. 65870) really fit the profile and fall into the same category of cities that are on the list. LOL
Boy, are you guys touchy about this and sure take these silly "best/worst city" lists seriously!
"Fashion" is a marketing business to sell crap that will be out of "fashion" in a year or so, allowing them to sell you different crap then. It has no bearing on real life.
If you can't buy it at Mark's Work Warehouse, you don't need it.
If you can't buy it at Mark's Work Warehouse, you don't need it.
I'm freakin' proud of the continued success of Lululemon. :nod: Companies like Nike, GAP, and Nordstrom are spending hundred of millions of $$$ just to get a piece of Lulu's market share and wishing that the Vancouver fashion phenomenon would replicate in American cities. :thumb:
