U.S.A. Election - World Vote Results!
- Thread starter Maury Beniowski
- Start date
I nominate Kerry for the UN. It is obvious he has support from around the world and would certainly take care of others welfare before he took care of the US.
Just watch jow quickly he becomes the hated one if he is elected. I give it 3 months.
What is most interesting about that poll is Bush got the most support from the middle east
Just watch jow quickly he becomes the hated one if he is elected. I give it 3 months.
What is most interesting about that poll is Bush got the most support from the middle east
Bush must be doing something right, the rest of the world hates him and us. Now it truly is time to tell the rest of the world to fuck off and bring the troops homw and let the corrupt regimes of china russia and france protect the world, oh wait a minute perhaps canada can protect us. (hehehe)
luckydog, dittman – let’s hope for a clear decisive winner… without suspect voting, where every voter can vote, where every vote is counted, without the lawyers and lawsuits, without state supreme courts, without your Supreme Court involvement… good luck to your country.
Another poll (for what it’s worth):
Given the shifting dynamic of cell phone usage (generally a “younger demographic”), there’s been considerable debate around the fact the current polls and their polling doesn’t include mobile telephone users. Just released, the first poll conducted exclusively on mobile phones:
Young Mobile Voters Pick Kerry Over Bush, 55% to 40%
Another poll (for what it’s worth):
Given the shifting dynamic of cell phone usage (generally a “younger demographic”), there’s been considerable debate around the fact the current polls and their polling doesn’t include mobile telephone users. Just released, the first poll conducted exclusively on mobile phones:
Young Mobile Voters Pick Kerry Over Bush, 55% to 40%
luckydog71 said:
Then you have Bush. Some one that created a war claiming that a country wasn't abiding by a UN resolution. So without the consent of the UN, Bush started a war against that country.
With no WMD's found, the main reason for this war was proven to be a lie. So now Bush is claiming that the world is better off without a dictator.
Meanwhile Bush set up a military governor to oversee the writing of a new constitution for this country. To avoid ramifications of violating international law Bush replaces the military governor with an obvious puppet regime. The catch being the puppet regime must abide by all the laws created by the military governor.
And the raping of this country's national wealth is underway.
well, it seems that the UN along with many politicans in the US, Canada and UK to mention a few, have stated that the war in Iraq was not a "legal war"......these statememts are on record.
If that is the case then Saddam should be re-instated as the rightful leader of Iraq, after all he was deposed by an illegal act !!!!! lets see where that one goes.
If that is the case then Saddam should be re-instated as the rightful leader of Iraq, after all he was deposed by an illegal act !!!!! lets see where that one goes.
Dr, I agree. Let's free Sadam from jail. Rebuild his palaces, complete with rape rooms. Apologize for blowing the shit out of his slimy sons.
Actually if Kerry wins a lot of PERBs may get their wish. I believe Kerry will set up a more protectionist’s country.
The unions will make him restrict import and reduce our trade deficit
We will pull out of Iraq in very short time (of course his friends in France will pick up the slack).
Our armed forces will only move once we have received permission from the rest of the world. That policy would have stopped us from entering World War 2, it was the Japanese that attacked us, why did the US attack Europe.
Be careful what you wish for, in case you get your wish.
Actually if Kerry wins a lot of PERBs may get their wish. I believe Kerry will set up a more protectionist’s country.
The unions will make him restrict import and reduce our trade deficit
We will pull out of Iraq in very short time (of course his friends in France will pick up the slack).
Our armed forces will only move once we have received permission from the rest of the world. That policy would have stopped us from entering World War 2, it was the Japanese that attacked us, why did the US attack Europe.
Be careful what you wish for, in case you get your wish.
Actually, Nazi Germany declared war on the US before the US entered the war. It was done in conjunction with the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbour. Now that would have been just one reason for the US entering the war in Europe. Back to the history books, my friend.
BP - I doubt the US committed its troops to invade Europe was based on the declaration of war by Germany (although I will admitted I did not know that). I am sure it was to help our friends (the Brits) and our own self interest. If Germany had defeated Britain, I am sure they would have joined up with Japan and invaded the US.
Would making an attempt to assassinate the President be taken as a declaration of war as well?
Would making an attempt to assassinate the President be taken as a declaration of war as well?
I understood Dr. I support the US and Britain invading Iraq and over throwing Sadam. We should have done that the first time.drromance said:
I would like to see Iraq take on more of their own security at a faster pace. It is time to bring our boys and girls home, but the job needs to be finished first. If that takes longer than we all like so be it.
Markets vote.
It was pretty scary on the markets after 2:30 PM after the advance poll votes showed Kerry within striking distance. The markets went from +75 gain to a quick -30 loss. A quick swing of more than 100 points.
The markets badly want a Bush win.
It was pretty scary on the markets after 2:30 PM after the advance poll votes showed Kerry within striking distance. The markets went from +75 gain to a quick -30 loss. A quick swing of more than 100 points.
The markets badly want a Bush win.
