I'll say right away I probably hate the Olympics being here more than anyone for so many reasons.
But back to Translink, I'm glad they have done whatever it is they did (didn't follow it exactly). Translink was too free to tax without enough representation. And they are all too happy to try and build legacies to leave behind whether their ideas were sane or not.
At any rate, if more tax money needs to be raised, raising the fuel tax is a much better option that some of their other retarded options. Lets see, you can either simply raise the fuel tax as much as needed which doesn't cost any overhead to do or ... you can introduce a parking tax that takes millions to administer and brings in hardly anything while punishing businesses ... or you can add a vehicle levy that again costs a lot of money to administer ... and just costs drivers the same money they would have paid in fuel tax anyway ... actually it didn't make sense as it was there so you could pay for your use of the roads, but it doesn't take into account how much you drive, where a fuel tax does.
Anyway, I think pouring a lot of money into transit in this region is a waste of money. The area is just not dense enough. The RAV line is retarded as it's a pile of money to just go from point A to point B without that much in between, and without any place to extend. They should just leave transit funding where it is at, and I say it mostly should be paid by the users. In the end I'd really wish they would stop taking less money out of my pocket.