The Obama Deception - Full Film

[myselftheother]

I beg to differ. This movie is waking people up and things will have to change. They are imploding the economy and building concentration camps.

Where? What state? Why isn't the UN condemning this? Are they firing up the ovens and the showers? Where are the mass graves of those victims? Where is the forensic proof? Where are the charges of genocide or mass murder by the UN? Show me photographic proof rather than some movie made by a guy with his own political agenda. Who knows what secrets Alex Jones has...who is really bankrolling him? Who's thumb is he under?

I need proof to believe these things. I'm not close minded, but I'm not gullible either. I've learned a long time ago not to believe everything I hear and read, watch on tv or the internet. If such a thing is happening or has happened, where are the horror stories of those victims' families...friends....anybody. Other than those who report with a propagandist agenda. I'm not right wing or much of a lefty....believe in human rights and freedoms....hell, I'm a pooner....but is this more than just entertainment or a true cause?

What is really the truth? Let's send LB down there to investigate!!!

 

[wess]

I beg to differ. This movie is waking people up and things will have to change. They are imploding the economy and building concentration camps.

Thank for proving my point for me. I still have not seen it and by what you just said, it must be the most useless load of BS that this "alex jones" freak has ever put out.

 

[LightBearer]

Where? What state? Why isn't the UN condemning this? Are they firing up the ovens and the showers? Where are the mass graves of those victims? Where is the forensic proof? Where are the charges of genocide or mass murder by the UN? Show me photographic proof rather than some movie made by a guy with his own political agenda. Who knows what secrets Alex Jones has...who is really bankrolling him? Who's thumb is he under?

I need proof to believe these things. I'm not close minded, but I'm not gullible either. I've learned a long time ago not to believe everything I hear and read, watch on tv or the internet. If such a thing is happening or has happened, where are the horror stories of those victims' families...friends....anybody. Other than those who report with a propagandist agenda. I'm not right wing or much of a lefty....believe in human rights and freedoms....hell, I'm a pooner....but is this more than just entertainment or a true cause?

What is really the truth? Let's send LB down there to investigate!!!

why would the UN condemn this if they are puppets? The reason for WW2 was to get a UN in the first place. What victims and what graves are you talking about? Did you even watch The Obama Deception? I'm guessing no... Have you ever watched an Alex Jones documentary? I'm guessing no.

 

[LightBearer]

Thank for proving my point for me. I still have not seen it and by what you just said, it must be the most useless load of BS that this "alex jones" freak has ever put out.

Yea he hasnt seen it and as usual your going to judge without examining the movie which is the subject of the thread in the first place. You'd make the best CSI ever. "I dont need to see the crime scene I already have a good idea who did it" "But sir we found..." "BAH! I dont wanna hear it its a conspiracy I already have my mind made up and no evidence will change my mind" Can I call you Gill Grisholm? How about Horatio or Mac Taylor?

 

[bruins70]

Have you said anything to my posts other than a thoughtless insults? Didnt think so. Ad hominem away.

Given that your response to any argument is that you're right and anyone who dissents is wrong there's really no point in trying to have a rational discussion.

Of course given the sheer lunacy of this nonsense you're peddling, rationality got lost in the dust a long time ago.

Baaaaaa

 

[zaig]

why would the UN condemn this if they are puppets? The reason for WW2 was to get a UN in the first place. What victims and what graves are you talking about? Did you even watch The Obama Deception? I'm guessing no... Have you ever watched an Alex Jones documentary? I'm guessing no.

I could be wrong, but this one quote is possibly the single stupidest thing you have ever written on this board, and that is saying quite a bit.

And I quote "the reason for WWII was to get a UN in the first place."

Could you please direct me to your sources aside from Alex Jones.

With this one statement, you have lost any credibility (not that you really had any to begin with) you may have had. Is this what you call thinking outside the box?

You once asked people on the board to debunk what Alex Jones has pushed.
Well, I could go on and on, but the best way for anyone with a bit of time and brains is to just google debunk Alex Jones. You would be amazed at what comes up. Of course these are all lies by the Illuminatti, and people on their payroll, or are behind all these conspiracies themselves.

I really think we should rename you lightheaded, cause there isn't anything up there that actually works.

Have a nice day.

 

[LightBearer]

I could be wrong, but this one quote is possibly the single stupidest thing you have ever written on this board, and that is saying quite a bit.

And I quote "the reason for WWII was to get a UN in the first place."

Could you please direct me to your sources aside from Alex Jones.

With this one statement, you have lost any credibility (not that you really had any to begin with) you may have had. Is this what you call thinking outside the box?

You once asked people on the board to debunk what Alex Jones has pushed.
Well, I could go on and on, but the best way for anyone with a bit of time and brains is to just google debunk Alex Jones. You would be amazed at what comes up. Of course these are all lies by the Illuminatti, and people on their payroll, or are behind all these conspiracies themselves.

I really think we should rename you lightheaded, cause there isn't anything up there that actually works.

Have a nice day.

What's the point you'll just call it a conspiracy. And I didnt mean it WAS THE ONLY REASON it was one of the RESULTS they were hoping for. You'd call it a conspiracy if I said the sun came up this morning. STFU and die.

 

[zaig]

What's the point you'll just call it a conspiracy. And I didnt mean it WAS THE ONLY REASON it was one of the RESULTS they were hoping for. You'd call it a conspiracy if I said the sun came up this morning. STFU and die.

You can tell the difference between REASON and RESULTS, can't you.

Were you misquoted? Did I read your posting incorrectly. Again I quote YOU,

"The reason for WWII was to get a UN in the first place"

Again, tell me I misread what you wrote..

Oh, and by the way, the die part is getting old.

 

[LightBearer]

You can tell the difference between REASON and RESULTS, can't you.

Were you misquoted? Did I read your posting incorrectly. Again I quote YOU,

"The reason for WWII was to get a UN in the first place"

Again, tell me I misread what you wrote..

Oh, and by the way, the die part is getting old.

One of the reasons. I type fast, I've said it many times before. Now die already.

 

[HankQuinlan]

One of the things that never seems to come up....the conspiracy theorists never seem to post what kind of a world they want to see once the overlords are exposed once and for all and sent packing.
- What form of government will we have?
- Does it only apply to the US? If so, will they have any ties with the rest of the world? Trade? Military dominance?
- What happens to the remaining sheeple? Are they reeducated?
- Is it Christian only? White only?
- Is there any assistance to the poor? Are there any government services at all? Police? Armed Forces? Education? Health care?
- Are all the foreigners kicked out? (assuming it's for the US only)
- What personal rights do people have? (other than gun ownership) Abortion? Can I still smoke my brains out on pot? Prostitution?

Can you answer that in your own words?

 

[trackstar]

One of the things that never seems to come up....the conspiracy theorists never seem to post what kind of a world they want to see once the overlords are exposed once and for all and sent packing.
- What form of government will we have?
- Does it only apply to the US?
- What happens to the remaining sheeple? Are they reeducated?
- Is it Christian only? White only?
- Are all the foreigners kicked out? (assuming it's for the US only)
- What personal rights do people have? (other than gun ownership)

Can you answer that in your own words?

Okay Hankster, as a person for whom I have developed a great deal of respect for based on your intelligent and well informed posts, I would be curious as to your opinion in regards to President Obama. Also, if you believe that he is a, "Puppet" (I'm not saying you do, it's more of a question), who do you believe is pulling his strings?

 

[LightBearer]

One of the things that never seems to come up....the conspiracy theorists never seem to post what kind of a world they want to see once the overlords are exposed once and for all and sent packing.
- What form of government will we have?
- Does it only apply to the US?
- What happens to the remaining sheeple? Are they reeducated?
- Is it Christian only? White only?
- Are all the foreigners kicked out? (assuming it's for the US only)
- What personal rights do people have? (other than gun ownership)

Can you answer that in your own words?

-A small government that FOLLOWS the constitution. (As for Canada we need to break our ties from British rule. Queen E still rules Canada.)
-Where ever people rise up and throw out there dictators.
-You sheep can stay, no reeducation needed. Its called freedom.
-No its not christian only, or white only. Why would it be?
-Illegal aliens would be kicked out, legal aliens are fine.
-The rights people will have is the Constituition (for the USA) or whatever Bill/Charter or rights.


But if your curious about the Queen running Canada read Reuters....
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-36875520081204

 

[myselftheother]

One of the reasons. I type fast, I've said it many times before. Now die already.

Why don't you just kick off? We're not going to die on demand, but feel free to to off yourself anytime....sooner the better.

Seriously, what are you...12? Die, already...die die die! It's like you're losing an argument or not getting along with your friends in the sandbox....you really need help. Lots of it. When was the last time you had a date? Other than your right hand, jar of Vaseline, a wooden spoon and a photo of Alex Jones?

Poor little conspiracy boy....bet you get a bit of wood watching Mulder and Scully....listening to Alex Jones on Coast to Coast AM and seething in the dark.

That's not an ad hominem....that's hubris.

 

[myselftheother]

-A small government that FOLLOWS the constitution. (As for Canada we need to break our ties from British rule. Queen E still rules Canada.)
-Where ever people rise up and throw out there dictators.
-You sheep can stay, no reeducation needed. Its called freedom.
-No its not christian only, or white only. Why would it be?
-Illegal aliens would be kicked out, legal aliens are fine.
-The rights people will have is the Constituition (for the USA) or whatever Bill/Charter or rights.


But if your curious about the Queen running Canada read Reuters....
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-36875520081204

Queen doesn't run Canada. It was a formality to ask the Gov.Gen to suspend Parliment. And it's the Charter of Rights in Canada....not sure what country where you're from, but in Canada that's what we have here. No constitution, or Bill of Rights....that's the USA.

Canada and the Queen signed the Charter in 1982, making the Monarchy of England just a figurehead of Canada, and giving us autonomy from British rule or influence. Trudeau was PM then....

Anyway, you're still an idiot....

 

[LightBearer]

Queen doesn't run Canada. It was a formality to ask the Gov.Gen to suspend Parliment. And it's the Charter of Rights in Canada....not sure what country where you're from, but in Canada that's what we have here. No constitution, or Bill of Rights....that's the USA.

Canada and the Queen signed the Charter in 1982, making the Monarchy of England just a figurehead of Canada, and giving us autonomy from British rule or influence. Trudeau was PM then....

Anyway, you're still an idiot....

I know we have a Charter of Rights, I was including all countries. Bill/Charter is what I said okay? And the Queen does run Canada. Our police, military take an oath to her. The Queen is Canadas HEAD OF STATE read the article please.
The monarchy of Canada, or Canadian monarchy,[1][2] is a constitutional system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Canada,[3] forming the core of the country's Westminster style parliamentary democracy.[4] The terms Crown in Right of Canada, Her Majesty in Right of Canada, or The Queen in Right of Canada may also be used to refer to the entire executive of the government of Canada. Though the Canadian Crown has its roots in the French and British Crowns, it has evolved over the centuries to become a distinctly Canadian institution,[5] represented by unique symbols, and sometimes being colloquially dubbed the Maple Crown;[6] a term first coined by Governor General Lord Grey in 1905.[7]

The present monarch is Elizabeth II – officially titled Queen of Canada (French: Reine du Canada) – who has reigned since February 6, 1952. She, her consort and other members of the Canadian Royal Family undertake various public and private functions across Canada and on behalf of the country abroad. However, the Queen is the only member of the Royal Family with any constitutional role, holding ultimate executive authority,[4][8] though her Royal Prerogative remains bound by laws enacted by her in parliament and by conventions and precedents,[3] leaving the day-to-day exercise of executive power to her Cabinet. While several powers are the sovereign's alone, most of the royal constitutional and ceremonial duties in Canada are carried out by the Queen's representative, the Governor General;[3] as such, the Governor General can sometimes be referred to as the de facto head of state.[9] In each of Canada's provinces the monarch is represented by a lieutenant-governor.[3] The territories are not sovereign, and thus do not have a viceroy.

The Canadian monarch, besides reigning in Canada, separately serves as monarch for each of fifteen other Commonwealth countries known as Commonwealth realms. This developed from the former colonial relationship of these countries to Britain, but they are now independent and the monarchy of each is legally distinct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_Canada

 

[HankQuinlan]

Okay Hankster, as a person for whom I have developed a great deal of respect for based on your intelligent and well informed posts, I would be curious as to your opinion in regards to President Obama. Also, if you believe that he is a, "Puppet" (I'm not saying you do, it's more of a question), who do you believe is pulling his strings?

I think he is a very shrewd and ambitious person, who attracted other shrewd and ambitious people that saw his potential. He has spent his entire career being a politician, stepping up from one office to a higher one, who correctly spotted a niche that he could reach and fill. He saw a country that was dispirited by too many hacks in office for too long, especially after the disaster of the last eight years, and appealed successfully to the best in the American people who wanted to regain pride in their country.

Unfortunately, no one has the vision to deal with the proportions of the current crisis, and no one can navigate the quagmires of federal US politics with totally clean hands. I think he is out of his depth with the bailout/recovery packages, and that probably everyone else is too. I think that he has been too invested in the Wall Street financial companies as the primary engine of growth in their economy and is as stumped for an alternative economic model as anyone else. I suspect that it is a sincere gamble, and that he doesn't know what else to do.

I don't think anyone is pulling his strings, unlike say the last president who was clearly signing off whatever Cheney and the neocon cabal said. I think his group of advisors have great influence, both on the campaigns that demonstrated his political savvy, and on his policies, but I bet the buck stops with him.

 

[LightBearer]

I think he is a very shrewd and ambitious person, who attracted other shrewd and ambitious people that saw his potential. He has spent his entire career being a politician, stepping up from one office to a higher one, who correctly spotted a niche that he could reach and fill. He saw a country that was dispirited by too many hacks in office for too long, especially after the disaster of the last eight years, and appealed successfully to the best in the American people who wanted to regain pride in their country.

Unfortunately, no one has the vision to deal with the proportions of the current crisis, and no one can navigate the quagmires of federal US politics with totally clean hands. I think he is out of his depth with the bailout/recovery packages, and that probably everyone else is too. I think that he has been too invested in the Wall Street financial companies as the primary engine of growth in their economy and is as stumped for an alternative economic model as anyone else. I suspect that it is a sincere gamble, and that he doesn't know what else to do.

I don't think anyone is pulling his strings, unlike say the last president who was clearly signing off whatever Cheney and the neocon cabal said. I think his group of advisors have great influence, both on the campaigns that demonstrated his political savvy, and on his policies, but I bet the buck stops with him.

If no one is pulling his strings than why has Wall ST contributed 4 times what americans did to his campaign? He's surrounded by Bushite neocons and that israeli gangster Rahm Emmanuel. The media worshipping Obama right away. If he was really for "change" he should have had way more resistance, the estalishment cant have someone changing things now they can. The same agenda continues whether it's Bush, Clinton, Obama etc.

 

[Shybutniceguy]

Wow, you've watched it a lot!

LMAO, actually he doesn't realize that 250 000 views on the net is small potatoes. I'm sure you can find plenty of videos of other people doing stupid shit with a million views in a few days.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmI1xqivr3E
Check out how many views this video has for instance. This guy's videos average 1 million views, putting your friend Alex to shame I'm sorry to say.
And this guy's videos are actually entertaining and funny shit.

 

[LightBearer]

LMAO, actually he doesn't realize that 250 000 views on the net is small potatoes. I'm sure you can find plenty of videos of other people doing stupid shit with a million views in a few days.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmI1xqivr3E
Check out how many views this video has for instance. This guy's videos average 1 million views, putting your friend Alex to shame I'm sorry to say.
And this guy's videos are actually entertaining and funny shit.

250,000 views in 1 day on 1 link when there are many different links to the movie. Its over 1 million total. Not including www.prisonplanet.tv views. Go suck on that.

 

[trackstar]

I think he is a very shrewd and ambitious person, who attracted other shrewd and ambitious people that saw his potential. He has spent his entire career being a politician, stepping up from one office to a higher one, who correctly spotted a niche that he could reach and fill. He saw a country that was dispirited by too many hacks in office for too long, especially after the disaster of the last eight years, and appealed successfully to the best in the American people who wanted to regain pride in their country.

Unfortunately, no one has the vision to deal with the proportions of the current crisis, and no one can navigate the quagmires of federal US politics with totally clean hands. I think he is out of his depth with the bailout/recovery packages, and that probably everyone else is too. I think that he has been too invested in the Wall Street financial companies as the primary engine of growth in their economy and is as stumped for an alternative economic model as anyone else. I suspect that it is a sincere gamble, and that he doesn't know what else to do.

I don't think anyone is pulling his strings, unlike say the last president who was clearly signing off whatever Cheney and the neocon cabal said. I think his group of advisors have great influence, both on the campaigns that demonstrated his political savvy, and on his policies, but I bet the buck stops with him.

Thank you. That is definitely my hope