The NDP LEAP manifesto

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,543
7
0
Calgary
No need for rebuttal. You've amply provided evidence of your selfishness, close-mindedness, lack off comprehension and intolerance with your own posts.
How am I intolerant?Am I intolerant because I am not one of the sheeple?Am I intolerant because I am not one of the zealots that treat the climate change religion spewed by the leftist media and pushed by leftist governments as gospel?I comprehend quite well what is going on with regards to the "climate change" movement and it's end result is a wealth transfer from Western Society.Your response speaks volumes about you as a filthy Socialist.

Nope ! We learned a long time ago that conspiracy theorists are not to be messed with ....

But do not take it as being in the right but instead politeness on our part ...
I am not a conspiracy theorist nor a tin hatter....I did meet one of those die-hard NDP supporters last year at the Premier's Stampede breakfast which is held has McDougal House.The first thing she proclaimed was that it was the NDP breakfast....then she went on with other ramblings like how Harper bailed out the banks in secret for 10 TRILLION and even more nonsensical crapulence.....the leathery faced old bag who is most likely a lifer on dissability welfare caused about 15 people to leave the line with her rantings....damn well wish I had a better phone at the time so I could have recorded it and put it on youtube.


Is this the same Patrick Moore you're talking about?

Sounds as credible as you.

https://youtu.be/ovKw6YjqSfM
Patrick Moore holds a degree in Ecology and what he was talking about in your example is "Golden Rice" which is a GMO food that is enriched with beta carotine which prevents blindness.It is his personal agenda to try and get it grown in 3rd world countries so as to help to solve problems in those countries.With regards to Greenpeace "Golden Rice" is a GMO and an affront to "Mother Earth"...that literally is the stand from Greenpeace....it is an affront to "Mother Earth"....to hell if it actually benefits the people or helps them....let them starve and go blind.....cant insult "Mother Earth" with something as evil a a genetically modified food source that helps people.

When it comes right down to it the environment movement has evolved to the state where it is like a religion.If you say you are skeptical of the public sector paid scientists findings you are treated like a heretic in Egypt 2000 years ago and the zealots want you stoned to death.

As for all three of you that I have answered in this post.If you drive a car you are a hypocrite.If you heat your home you are a hypocrite.If you own ANYTHING including your smartphone which contains plastic which is derived from oil you are a hypocrite.

I have said it a couple of times in this thread and I will say it again....go to the NDP website and actually READ the LEAP manifesto.

SR
 

thodisipagal

Active member
Oct 23, 2010
413
36
28
Surrey
How am I intolerant?Am I intolerant because I am not one of the sheeple?Am I intolerant because I am not one of the zealots that treat the climate change religion spewed by the leftist media and pushed by leftist governments as gospel?I comprehend quite well what is going on with regards to the "climate change" movement and it's end result is a wealth transfer from Western Society.Your response speaks volumes about you as a filthy Socialist.



I am not a conspiracy theorist nor a tin hatter....I did meet one of those die-hard NDP supporters last year at the Premier's Stampede breakfast which is held has McDougal House.The first thing she proclaimed was that it was the NDP breakfast....then she went on with other ramblings like how Harper bailed out the banks in secret for 10 TRILLION and even more nonsensical crapulence.....the leathery faced old bag who is most likely a lifer on dissability welfare caused about 15 people to leave the line with her rantings....damn well wish I had a better phone at the time so I could have recorded it and put it on youtube.




Patrick Moore holds a degree in Ecology and what he was talking about in your example is "Golden Rice" which is a GMO food that is enriched with beta carotine which prevents blindness.It is his personal agenda to try and get it grown in 3rd world countries so as to help to solve problems in those countries.With regards to Greenpeace "Golden Rice" is a GMO and an affront to "Mother Earth"...that literally is the stand from Greenpeace....it is an affront to "Mother Earth"....to hell if it actually benefits the people or helps them....let them starve and go blind.....cant insult "Mother Earth" with something as evil a a genetically modified food source that helps people.

When it comes right down to it the environment movement has evolved to the state where it is like a religion.If you say you are skeptical of the public sector paid scientists findings you are treated like a heretic in Egypt 2000 years ago and the zealots want you stoned to death.

As for all three of you that I have answered in this post.If you drive a car you are a hypocrite.If you heat your home you are a hypocrite.If you own ANYTHING including your smartphone which contains plastic which is derived from oil you are a hypocrite.

I have said it a couple of times in this thread and I will say it again....go to the NDP website and actually READ the LEAP manifesto.

SR
You used Moore as your witness to prove climate change is a hoax.

The video clip shows your witness peed in his pants.

Credibility, once lost, is hard to gain back.
 

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,421
6,533
113
Westwood
My father was a published scientist. He also did peer review for a couple of journals.
There are fields in science where there is rich debate.
The Big Bang was originally a term of ridicule and is now a prevailing model for instance.
Fred Hoyle may have been rude but his science was valid. Same with Crick.
Working for a large chemical corporation or a publically funded lab is always considered a factor in the evaluation. Confirmation bias is a real thing.
That said, I remember my father and others discussing climate change as a result of human activity in the early 1970s. He was pretty objective and had no hidden agenda.
I have yet to be convinced by a real paper disputing human influence on climate.
 

Sporting

Well-known member
Feb 7, 2010
624
437
63
Some debate "the facts". Others are hard at work, daring to redesign our entire energy and transportation grid to reduce consumption, and clean up the environment. Follow Elon Musk for further details as they unfold.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts