The findings of my unofficial investigation into a "severe warning" thread

[Man Mountain]

The following warning thread is what spurred on my "investigation"

http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?216256-Madison-6041-****severe-warning*****-must-read

I have a very strong suspicion that the following linked ads are all being posted by the same suspect as whomever posted the Madison 6041 ad, which disappeared soon after that review was posted. Now, when I say "strong suspicion," I know for a fact that they are all being placed by the same leolist account. As I posted in that thread:

And sure enough, after doing a quick search of leolist just moments ago, it would appear that the "Madison" ads have been deleted and I also found nothing by searching for "6041". I have a strong suspicion that I've already seen the newly rebranded ad with a new name and new number and all new fake pics -- and this time a fresh ad with a low view count, so the hustler is apparently learning new tricks from reading what red flags we look for in ads.

By the way, my suspicion is based on more than just an educated guess but if I reveal how I figured it out, this hustler would probably just figure out how to circumvent my detection tactic. It wouldn't really be hard to figure it out anyway but since we know she/he/they (if it's a group) are reading these posts, why make it easy for them?

But I will officially claim "strong suspicion" since I will keep how I know this to myself and I will allow others to decide for themselves whether they think I can be trusted or not

(In case anyone asks... no, I'm not a hacker. I couldn't hack my way out of a paper bag. Anybody could figure out what I did if they knew what to look for.)

The three posted ads that I'm currently sure of with links:

Nadia 3914

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...s_blonde_playmate_xoxo_upscale_barbie-1040619

(this link was also an ad for a Brandi 5436 at one time - reviewed here: http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?216254-Brandi-5436 -- this is a very rare positive review of one of the advertised ladies linked to these ads. Take with as many grains of salt as you see fit.)

Summer 8898

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...couver_hot_white_girl_ready_to_please-1135977

http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?217758-Summer-8898

Celine 0732

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...ity_xoxo_celine_xoxox_blonde_playmate-1145503

There is currently one more ad that I strongly suspect is also one that can be linked back to this leolist account but I can not yet prove it (to myself) without doubt and I don't want to inadvertently cast aspersions on someone who may not be part of this one.

Remember, there's a very good chance this advertiser reads this forum. And the names and numbers often change after negative feedback here. However, the links are often recycled with those new names and numbers. So, checking the links every so often may reveal the rebrands. Although, on at least one occasion now, the burned link has been deleted in favour of a fresh ad. And I may not always be able to keep up. It did take some time and luck to put this short list together after all.

So, my best advice is to continue doing due dilligence by way of image searches and forum based research. I hope this helps.

Edit: I can now confirm the following ad is also one of this advertiser's ads (I feel pretty dumb that I actually missed this earlier :doh: )

Chloe 0951

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-companions/metro-vancouver/vancouver_brunette_barbie-1072227

 

[Cappa]

Spot on!

I want this stickied.

 

[InnocentBoy]

I asked if i could do a duo with summer and celine as at one point they were both using the same fake pictures. Best way to fight scammer is just to have everyone book no shows, save others from getting scammed.

 

[jmt]

Thanks for all the good work Man Mountain. Just checked, Summer, Celine and Nadia all have ads up.

 

[Man Mountain]

A quick update. The following link for Nadia 3914 is "no longer active."

Nadia 3914

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...s_blonde_playmate_xoxo_upscale_barbie-1040619

(this link was also an ad for a Brandi 5436 at one time - reviewed here: http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?216254-Brandi-5436 -- this is a very rare positive review of one of the advertised ladies linked to these ads. Take with as many grains of salt as you see fit.)

However, a new ad link with new fake pics for Nadia with the 3914 number can now be found here:

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...arbie_xoxo_busty_and_upscale_playmate-1188123

And my crystal ball tells me that the following ad for Anita 2742 can be linked to whomever posted the new Nadia ad.

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...geous_white_girl_ready_to_please_xoxo-1191791

 

[Edward Lei]

^
My heart skipped a beat when I saw that ad for Anita 2742 but knew with 90% certainty before doing an image search that it was going to be fake.

Note the consistent use of red or blue font in their ads.

 

[suPERB]

^
My heart skipped a beat when I saw that ad for Anita 2742 but knew with 90% certainty before doing an image search that it was going to be fake.

Note the consistent use of red or blue font in their ads.[/QUOTE

Anita 2742 is using pics from one of my fave mfc models.

 

[Poonertime]

A quick update. The following link for Nadia 3914 is "no longer active."



However, a new ad link with new fake pics for Nadia with the 3914 number can now be found here:
http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...arbie_xoxo_busty_and_upscale_playmate-1188123

And my crystal ball tells me that the following ad for Anita 2742 can be linked to whomever posted the new Nadia ad.

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...geous_white_girl_ready_to_please_xoxo-1191791

Should we red flag these old accounts endorsing Nadia or is this a mistaken identity?

Somethings gotta give. A legitimate guy "Shake" inquired, In the thread someone said her body was nicer than the ridiculously hot fake photo which was posted by Vitargo. I assumed she decided to post her real photo after the criticism, given she had nothing to be ashamed of. Disturbing if it's all a lie.
I guess you checked and verified the photo is fake? The issue of the endorsement remains.

Endorsement here:
http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?216943-Nadia-3914-Anyone&highlight=nadia

 

[Man Mountain]

Should we red flag these old accounts endorsing Nadia or is this a mistaken identity?

Somethings gotta give. A legitimate guy "Shake" inquired, In the thread someone said her body was nicer than the ridiculously hot fake photo which was posted by Vitargo. I assumed she decided to post her real photo after the criticism, given she had nothing to be ashamed of. Disturbing if it's all a lie.
I guess you checked and verified the photo is fake? The issue of the endorsement remains.

Endorsement here:
http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?216943-Nadia-3914-Anyone&highlight=nadia

So many questions. When doing Google Image Searches on them, I get multiple results for 3 of the 4 pics for women who are supposedly in France, Miami, Texas, etc. Feel free to draw your own conclusions as to what that means. As for the "endorsements" from that other thread, I will admit that JamieA is a member of this forum whom I tend to give the benefit of the doubt. But note the qualifiers of his endorsement. The other member who gives the ringing endorsement has not contributed enough for me to pass judgment on how much faith I put in his opinions. I do know that when I looked into the posting history, that member contributed a somewhat negative review of a lady with whom I had a rather good time the one time I saw her. So, my scales are not tipping in that members favour but again, every member should take the information available to them and draw their own conclusions. I am simply providing an additional level of information that the members can consider before they make their decisions.

 

[Man Mountain]

The Name and Number Shuffle Report

However, a new ad link with new fake pics for Nadia with the 3914 number can now be found here:

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...arbie_xoxo_busty_and_upscale_playmate-1188123

The Nadia advertising link now has Nadia at 29 years with new fake pics (2 of the 3 returning multiple hits via a Google Image Search) and a new number in the body of the ad: 4598 (at the time of this post, the 3914 number is still listed in the contact info under the "Say you saw my ad on LeoList.cc" graphic)

And my crystal ball tells me that the following ad for Anita 2742 can be linked to whomever posted the new Nadia ad.

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...geous_white_girl_ready_to_please_xoxo-1191791

The Anita ad has been updated with new pics, one of which comes back as being Daniela Lanio via a Google Image Search. According to her twitter page, she's based in Florida. (I should note that I only did a quick, cursory Google Image Saerch but that I did not get results for the other two pictures in the ad. However, that first pic looks very familiar to me for some reason). And the current number is 2456.

Edit: Doing a closer look at the first pic, I believe it may have been used previously by an advertiser named Destiny. I welcome any member to confirm or refute.

For the sake of full disclosure, at this time, I have not been able to link the following two ads with certainty to whomever posted the previous ads. So, I leave it up to the readers to decide for themselves what conclusions they draw from the following information.

The pics that were being used previously in the Anita ad are now being used in an ad for a Kimmie 3107

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...ot_hot_brunette_goddess_ready_to_play-1207771

The pics from the last Nadia 3914 ad are now being used in the following ad for a Jenna 2038

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...ng_busty_blond_playmate_in_town_xoxox-1207763

 

[wildone2009]

Mountain Man your a superstar. Thanks for the hard work.

 

[Man Mountain]

For the sake of full disclosure, at this time, I have not been able to link the following two ads with certainty to whomever posted the previous ads. So, I leave it up to the readers to decide for themselves what conclusions they draw from the following information.

The pics that were being used previously in the Anita ad are now being used in an ad for a Kimmie 3107

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/fem...ot_hot_brunette_goddess_ready_to_play-1207771

Looks like the Kimmie pics have changed again. Still fake, of course. And sadly, another brother got burned...

http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?218201-Kimmie-3107-WOT

 

[Man Mountain]

Looks like the Kimmie pics have changed again. Still fake, of course. And sadly, another brother got burned...

http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?218201-Kimmie-3107-WOT

Name now changed to savanah. Number is still 3107 at this time.

Edit: Just became Kendra 9171 with new fake pics.

 

[Man Mountain]

Edit: Just became Kendra 9171 with new fake pics.

And another gets burned:

http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?218747-Kendra-HOT-HOT-HOT-Goddess-Review

 

[Man Mountain]

Remember, there's a very good chance this advertiser reads this forum. And the names and numbers often change after negative feedback here. However, the links are often recycled with those new names and numbers. So, checking the links every so often may reveal the rebrands. Although, on at least one occasion now, the burned link has been deleted in favour of a fresh ad. And I may not always be able to keep up. It did take some time and luck to put this short list together after all.

So, my best advice is to continue doing due dilligence by way of image searches and forum based research. I hope this helps.

Edit: I can now confirm the following ad is also one of this advertiser's ads (I feel pretty dumb that I actually missed this earlier :doh: )

Chloe 0951

http://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-companions/metro-vancouver/vancouver_brunette_barbie-1072227

Check out which link has been recycled! (Now leads to sandra 1394) I haven't been checking as much recently and I'm pretty sure they figured out how I was able to discover their ads, so I haven't been able to keep up the way I was able to when I first posted this thread. So, again... be wary and dilligent, guys