The DaVinci Code

metoo113

Member
Aug 2, 2002
407
0
16
Somewhere Down The Crazy River
georgebushmoron said:
I was talking about the Venus and Mars book. But to me the Davinci thing appeals to the same general audience of misinformed peoples.

Its' a fictional book, what exactly do you have to be informed about to enjoy reading fiction.

Where as Venus and mars was marketed as a self help book. Quite a different matter.
 

wolverine

Hard Throbbing Member
Nov 11, 2002
6,384
9
38
E-Town
youngninnocent said:
You see I was unaware that a book of fiction needed to be researched, cross-referenced, consulted and re-researched in order to be not considered "fluff".

Well I guess it's a damn good thing Tolkien studied the habits and inter-society hierarchy of hobbits before publishing the Lord of the Rings.

Could you imagine the embarrassment he would have suffered if he just....oh I don't know.... made it up?
Actually, to be fair, Tolkien's works are heavily influenced by European mythology and folklore (esp re: elves, dwarves, dragons and orcs), and he did quite a bit of research in those subjects for his writing. Hobbits are his own creation but based on the rural English. The languages he invented were also derived from European linguistics. And finally, some of the stories were influenced by novels such as 'Beowulf' and by ancient Norse and Greek legends.

And back in the day, some literary critics also wrote off his books as 'fluff'.

Now why didn't someone sue Tolkien for using already-established source material? :rolleyes:
 

youngninnocent

New member
Nov 28, 2005
120
0
0
wolverine said:
Actually, to be fair, Tolkien's works are heavily influenced by European mythology and folklore (esp re: elves, dwarves, dragons and orcs), and he did quite a bit of research in those subjects for his writing. Hobbits are his own creation but based on the rural English. The languages he invented were also derived from European linguistics. And finally, some of the stories were influenced by novels such as 'Beowulf' and by ancient Norse and Greek legends.

And back in the day, some literary critics also wrote off his books as 'fluff'.

Now why didn't someone sue Tolkien for using already-established source material? :rolleyes:


:p
 

Hondius

New member
Aug 4, 2004
17
0
1
therealrex said:
Yeah National Treasure was basically a Davinci rip off
And The DaVinci Code is a rip off of Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum. Although Brown's book was an enjoyable light read it can hardly be considered original.
 

FuZzYknUckLeS

Monkey Abuser
May 11, 2005
2,210
1
0
Schmocation
LonelyGhost said:
...Jesus...he's not the first guy to claim the 'divine right to rule' and build a dynasty upon it ...
Actually...

...I think he is the first guy...

but hey. what do I know. maybe he stole the idea offa someone else...

:rolleyes:
 

LonelyGhost

Telefunkin
Apr 26, 2004
3,933
1
0
FuZzYknUckLeS said:
Actually...

...I think he is the first guy...

but hey. what do I know. maybe he stole the idea offa someone else...

:rolleyes:
Pharoes in Egypt (4600 BC) were already ruling by 'divine right' ... and don't forget that other famous guy (Let my people go!) who said 'your God ain't my God' and escaped from the planet of the apes!

:)
 

missing link

Banned
Dec 15, 2005
67
0
0
The davinci code is fact based on fiction...(the bible being fiction, and the davinci code explaining the facts and history behind all its corruption.)
 

FuZzYknUckLeS

Monkey Abuser
May 11, 2005
2,210
1
0
Schmocation
missing link said:
The davinci code is fact based on fiction...(the bible being fiction, and the davinci code explaining the facts and history behind all its corruption.)
I'm not as think as you stoned I am.
 

georgebushmoron

jus call me MR. President
Mar 25, 2003
3,126
2
0
56
Seattle
youngninnocent said:
That's quite the sweeping generalization of people whom enjoy reading fiction.

edit: However, I do agree with your sweeping generalization regarding the Mars & Venus book/s.
OK I'm not the President of the United States. I've lied to you all! Actually, I'm a janitor, and I sweep generalizations and make bathrooms a cleaner, better place. I also sweep people who don't like to use their brains into the garbage can. My life goal is to wash the scum off the streets.
 

high-speed

New member
Mar 14, 2005
84
0
0
Its a damn book, written as fiction using facts that have been interpeted by the author to get the storey that he wanted. Don't believe what you read any more than you would believe the "facts" in a Hollywood movie.
If it catches your attention read it and maybe you'll enjoy and maybe you won't but don't think your going to be a whole lot wiser when your finished than when you started.
Personally I didn't enjoy it very much, mainly because I thought it was fairly predictable and I wasn't surprised by many of the "facts" that the Author used but I have read a number of books on the Templers and Jesus' bloodline and most of the ideas in the book have been around for a while.
 

JustAGuy

New member
Jul 3, 2004
1,053
4
0
80
Manitoba
I read "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" in the early 80's and was intrigued by the premise (namely that a bloodline exists even today in France that is directly descended from Jesus Christ). But I guess the only way to appeal to the great unwashed with this idea was for someone to concoct a fictional "thriller" based on that same premise, which is what Dan Brown did by writing "The Da Vinci Code". Judging by the huge success of the book, I guess he hit the jackpot alright.

But if you're actually interested in reading a book on the subject that manages to be a real page turner without any of the needless thriller crap thrown in, then get a copy of the Baigent, Leigh and Lincoln book and don't waste your time on "The Da Vinci Code". In a somewhat similar vein, I'd also recommend "The Hiram Key" by Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts