Massage Adagio

The co2 lies

Poseidon

Mr. Controversy
Jul 21, 2003
576
0
16
Your place or mine?
http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/pages/Read-the-Charter.html


THE EARTH CHARTER
Preamble

We stand at a critical moment in Earth's history, a time when humanity must choose its future. As the world becomes increasingly interdependent and fragile, the future at once holds great peril and great promise. To move forward we must recognize that in the midst of a magnificent diversity of cultures and life forms we are one human family and one Earth community with a common destiny. We must join together to bring forth a sustainable global society founded on respect for nature, universal human rights, economic justice, and a culture of peace. Towards this end, it is imperative that we, the peoples of Earth, declare our responsibility to one another, to the greater community of life, and to future generations.

Earth, Our Home

Humanity is part of a vast evolving universe. Earth, our home, is alive with a unique community of life. The forces of nature make existence a demanding and uncertain adventure, but Earth has provided the conditions essential to life's evolution. The resilience of the community of life and the well-being of humanity depend upon preserving a healthy biosphere with all its ecological systems, a rich variety of plants and animals, fertile soils, pure waters, and clean air. The global environment with its finite resources is a common concern of all peoples. The protection of Earth's vitality, diversity, and beauty is a sacred trust.

The Global Situation

The dominant patterns of production and consumption are causing environmental devastation, the depletion of resources, and a massive extinction of species. Communities are being undermined. The benefits of development are not shared equitably and the gap between rich and poor is widening. Injustice, poverty, ignorance, and violent conflict are widespread and the cause of great suffering. An unprecedented rise in human population has overburdened ecological and social systems. The foundations of global security are threatened. These trends are perilous—but not inevitable.

The Challenges Ahead

The choice is ours: form a global partnership to care for Earth and one another or risk the destruction of ourselves and the diversity of life. Fundamental changes are needed in our values, institutions, and ways of living. We must realize that when basic needs have been met, human development is primarily about being more, not having more. We have the knowledge and technology to provide for all and to reduce our impacts on the environment. The emergence of a global civil society is creating new opportunities to build a democratic and humane world. Our environmental, economic, political, social, and spiritual challenges are interconnected, and together we can forge inclusive solutions.

Universal Responsibility

To realize these aspirations, we must decide to live with a sense of universal responsibility, identifying ourselves with the whole Earth community as well as our local communities. We are at once citizens of different nations and of one world in which the local and global are linked. Everyone shares responsibility for the present and future well-being of the human family and the larger living world. The spirit of human solidarity and kinship with all life is strengthened when we live with reverence for the mystery of being, gratitude for the gift of life, and humility regarding the human place in nature.

We urgently need a shared vision of basic values to provide an ethical foundation for the emerging world community. Therefore, together in hope we affirm the following interdependent principles for a sustainable way of life as a common standard by which the conduct of all individuals, organizations, businesses, governments, and transnational institutions is to be guided and assessed.


Top

Principles
I. RESPECT AND CARE FOR THE COMMUNITY OF LIFE

1. Respect Earth and life in all its diversity.
a. Recognize that all beings are interdependent and every form of life has value regardless of its worth to human beings.
b. Affirm faith in the inherent dignity of all human beings and in the intellectual, artistic, ethical, and spiritual potential of humanity.

2. Care for the community of life with understanding, compassion, and love.
a. Accept that with the right to own, manage, and use natural resources comes the duty to prevent environmental harm and to protect the rights of people.
b. Affirm that with increased freedom, knowledge, and power comes increased responsibility to promote the common good.

3. Build democratic societies that are just, participatory, sustainable, and peaceful.
a. Ensure that communities at all levels guarantee human rights and fundamental freedoms and provide everyone an opportunity to realize his or her full potential.
b. Promote social and economic justice, enabling all to achieve a secure and meaningful livelihood that is ecologically responsible.

4. Secure Earth's bounty and beauty for present and future generations.
a. Recognize that the freedom of action of each generation is qualified by the needs of future generations.
b. Transmit to future generations values, traditions, and institutions that support the long-term flourishing of Earth's human and ecological communities.

In order to fulfill these four broad commitments, it is necessary to:

Top
II. ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY

5. Protect and restore the integrity of Earth's ecological systems, with special concern for biological diversity and the natural processes that sustain life.

a. Adopt at all levels sustainable development plans and regulations that make environmental conservation and rehabilitation integral to all development initiatives.
b. Establish and safeguard viable nature and biosphere reserves, including wild lands and marine areas, to protect Earth's life support systems, maintain biodiversity, and preserve our natural heritage.
c. Promote the recovery of endangered species and ecosystems.
d. Control and eradicate non-native or genetically modified organisms harmful to native species and the environment, and prevent introduction of such harmful organisms.
e. Manage the use of renewable resources such as water, soil, forest products, and marine life in ways that do not exceed rates of regeneration and that protect the health of ecosystems.
f. Manage the extraction and use of non-renewable resources such as minerals and fossil fuels in ways that minimize depletion and cause no serious environmental damage.

6. Prevent harm as the best method of environmental protection and, when knowledge is limited, apply a precautionary approach.
a. Take action to avoid the possibility of serious or irreversible environmental harm even when scientific knowledge is incomplete or inconclusive.
b. Place the burden of proof on those who argue that a proposed activity will not cause significant harm, and make the responsible parties liable for environmental harm.
c. Ensure that decision making addresses the cumulative, long-term, indirect, long distance, and global consequences of human activities.
d. Prevent pollution of any part of the environment and allow no build-up of radioactive, toxic, or other hazardous substances.
e. Avoid military activities damaging to the environment.

7. Adopt patterns of production, consumption, and reproduction that safeguard Earth's regenerative capacities, human rights, and community well-being.
a. Reduce, reuse, and recycle the materials used in production and consumption systems, and ensure that residual waste can be assimilated by ecological systems.
b. Act with restraint and efficiency when using energy, and rely increasingly on renewable energy sources such as solar and wind.
c. Promote the development, adoption, and equitable transfer of environmentally sound technologies.
d. Internalize the full environmental and social costs of goods and services in the selling price, and enable consumers to identify products that meet the highest social and environmental standards.
e. Ensure universal access to health care that fosters reproductive health and responsible reproduction.
f. Adopt lifestyles that emphasize the quality of life and material sufficiency in a finite world.

8. Advance the study of ecological sustainability and promote the open exchange and wide application of the knowledge acquired.
a. Support international scientific and technical cooperation on sustainability, with special attention to the needs of developing nations.
b. Recognize and preserve the traditional knowledge and spiritual wisdom in all cultures that contribute to environmental protection and human well-being.
c. Ensure that information of vital importance to human health and environmental protection, including genetic information, remains available in the public domain.

Top
III. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE

9. Eradicate poverty as an ethical, social, and environmental imperative.
a. Guarantee the right to potable water, clean air, food security, uncontaminated soil, shelter, and safe sanitation, allocating the national and international resources required.
b. Empower every human being with the education and resources to secure a sustainable livelihood, and provide social security and safety nets for those who are unable to support themselves.
c. Recognize the ignored, protect the vulnerable, serve those who suffer, and enable them to develop their capacities and to pursue their aspirations.

10. Ensure that economic activities and institutions at all levels promote human development in an equitable and sustainable manner.
a. Promote the equitable distribution of wealth within nations and among nations.
b. Enhance the intellectual, financial, technical, and social resources of developing nations, and relieve them of onerous international debt.
c. Ensure that all trade supports sustainable resource use, environmental protection, and progressive labor standards.
d. Require multinational corporations and international financial organizations to act transparently in the public good, and hold them accountable for the consequences of their activities.

11. Affirm gender equality and equity as prerequisites to sustainable development and ensure universal access to education, health care, and economic opportunity.
a. Secure the human rights of women and girls and end all violence against them.
b. Promote the active participation of women in all aspects of economic, political, civil, social, and cultural life as full and equal partners, decision makers, leaders, and beneficiaries.
c. Strengthen families and ensure the safety and loving nurture of all family members.

12. Uphold the right of all, without discrimination, to a natural and social environment supportive of human dignity, bodily health, and spiritual well-being, with special attention to the rights of indigenous peoples and minorities.
a. Eliminate discrimination in all its forms, such as that based on race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, language, and national, ethnic or social origin.
b. Affirm the right of indigenous peoples to their spirituality, knowledge, lands and resources and to their related practice of sustainable livelihoods.
c. Honor and support the young people of our communities, enabling them to fulfill their essential role in creating sustainable societies.
d. Protect and restore outstanding places of cultural and spiritual significance.

Top
IV. DEMOCRACY, NONVIOLENCE, AND PEACE

13. Strengthen democratic institutions at all levels, and provide transparency and accountability in governance, inclusive participation in decision making, and access to justice.
a. Uphold the right of everyone to receive clear and timely information on environmental matters and all development plans and activities which are likely to affect them or in which they have an interest.
b. Support local, regional and global civil society, and promote the meaningful participation of all interested individuals and organizations in decision making.
c. Protect the rights to freedom of opinion, expression, peaceful assembly, association, and dissent.
d. Institute effective and efficient access to administrative and independent judicial procedures, including remedies and redress for environmental harm and the threat of such harm.
e. Eliminate corruption in all public and private institutions.
f. Strengthen local communities, enabling them to care for their environments, and assign environmental responsibilities to the levels of government where they can be carried out most effectively.

14. Integrate into formal education and life-long learning the knowledge, values, and skills needed for a sustainable way of life.
a. Provide all, especially children and youth, with educational opportunities that empower them to contribute actively to sustainable development.
b. Promote the contribution of the arts and humanities as well as the sciences in sustainability education.
c. Enhance the role of the mass media in raising awareness of ecological and social challenges.
d. Recognize the importance of moral and spiritual education for sustainable living.

15. Treat all living beings with respect and consideration.
a. Prevent cruelty to animals kept in human societies and protect them from suffering.
b. Protect wild animals from methods of hunting, trapping, and fishing that cause extreme, prolonged, or avoidable suffering.
c. Avoid or eliminate to the full extent possible the taking or destruction of non-targeted species.

16. Promote a culture of tolerance, nonviolence, and peace.
a. Encourage and support mutual understanding, solidarity, and cooperation among all peoples and within and among nations.
b. Implement comprehensive strategies to prevent violent conflict and use collaborative problem solving to manage and resolve environmental conflicts and other disputes.
c. Demilitarize national security systems to the level of a non-provocative defense posture, and convert military resources to peaceful purposes, including ecological restoration.
d. Eliminate nuclear, biological, and toxic weapons and other weapons of mass destruction.
e. Ensure that the use of orbital and outer space supports environmental protection and peace.
f. Recognize that peace is the wholeness created by right relationships with oneself, other persons, other cultures, other life, Earth, and the larger whole of which all are a part.

The Way Forward

As never before in history, common destiny beckons us to seek a new beginning. Such renewal is the promise of these Earth Charter principles. To fulfill this promise, we must commit ourselves to adopt and promote the values and objectives of the Charter.

This requires a change of mind and heart. It requires a new sense of global interdependence and universal responsibility. We must imaginatively develop and apply the vision of a sustainable way of life locally, nationally, regionally, and globally. Our cultural diversity is a precious heritage and different cultures will find their own distinctive ways to realize the vision. We must deepen and expand the global dialogue that generated the Earth Charter, for we have much to learn from the ongoing collaborative search for truth and wisdom.

Life often involves tensions between important values. This can mean difficult choices. However, we must find ways to harmonize diversity with unity, the exercise of freedom with the common good, short-term objectives with long-term goals. Every individual, family, organization, and community has a vital role to play. The arts, sciences, religions, educational institutions, media, businesses, nongovernmental organizations, and governments are all called to offer creative leadership. The partnership of government, civil society, and business is essential for effective governance.

In order to build a sustainable global community, the nations of the world must renew their commitment to the United Nations, fulfill their obligations under existing international agreements, and support the implementation of Earth Charter principles with an international legally binding instrument on environment and development.

Let ours be a time remembered for the awakening of a new reverence for life, the firm resolve to achieve sustainability, the quickening of the struggle for justice and peace, and the joyful celebration of life.
 

vancouverman

old PERBERTs never die
Jan 19, 2005
3,183
3
38
Vancouver - of course
www.VMSQ.com
Global warming? No, actually we're cooling, claim scientists




A cold Arctic summer has led to a record increase in the ice cap, leading experts to predict a period of global cooling.


There has been a 60 per cent increase in the amount of ocean covered with ice compared to this time last year, the equivalent of almost a million square miles.

In a rebound from 2012's record low, an unbroken ice sheet more than half the size of Europe already stretches from the Canadian islands to Russia's northern shores, days before the annual re-freeze is even set to begin.

The Northwest Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific has remained blocked by pack-ice all year, forcing some ships to change their routes.

A leaked report to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) seen by the Mail on Sunday, has led some scientists to claim that the world is heading for a period of cooling that will not end until the middle of this century.

If correct, it would contradict computer forecasts of imminent catastrophic warming. The news comes several years after the BBC predicted that the arctic would be ice-free by 2013.



more here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...o-actually-were-cooling-claim-scientists.html


( I'm just re-posting what I found.... please do not kill the messenger )
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,491
8
38
on yer ignore list
The issue is exactly like acid rain or air pollution. These largely conquered public policy issues were intractable political issues for decades with one side saying that fixing the issue would destroy the economy & others saying the costs were small. The reality was in the middle, but once the costs were integrated into the business process, the economy adjusted & carried on. Sounds like an irrational social dust-up now that we see that that economic armageddon didn't come to pass, but back in the day...
hey, here's a good one about acid rain...

remember all the small lakes in southern ontario went acid? do you know what cleaned them up? another environmental scourge - the zebra mussel!! those dang little mussels were such an efficient filter feeder that they literally hoovered the lakes clean, changing the chemistry from acid to neutral in the process. when they ran out of food they died and the lakes restored themselves to their natural state shortly thereafter

so there are sometimes some pretty ordinary solutions right under our noses - we just need to step out of the box in our thinking
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,491
8
38
on yer ignore list
Does anyone know what the percentage of the total co2 put into the atmosphere each year is man made as opposed to from nature?

Thank you
you just asked the REALLY big question there - and the normal sources of information are clogged up with the results of the global warming debate... also known as the co2 lies (and i'm including both pro and con in the category 'lies')

you're going to have to dig pretty deep for the answer to that question - a LOT deeper than the perb lounge. lol
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,037
44
48
[had to write something to delete post]
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,491
8
38
on yer ignore list
Uhmm... No. The test beds were with NORTHERN lakes (because they had no inflows from industrialized areas except the rain from air that came through the industrial heartland), although all lakes in the air-shed were affected. The reduction in lake acidification has been entirely from scrubbing sulfur dioxide from the industrial smokestacks of industrial installations and reducing the sulfur in fuel such as diesel. Zebra mussels have not, to my knowledge, made a difference in water PH.
there is brief mention of the effect in the following article http://www.biokids.umich.edu/critters/Dreissena_polymorpha/ under 'what roles do they have in the ecosystem?' near the end of the article

by feeding on phytoplankton blooms they have been able to clarify bodies of water from levels as shallow as 6 inches to levels as deep as 30 feet. the resulting chemical changes in the water include, at times, neutralization

i'm not promoting the use of zebra mussels as a cure for acid-rain-caused acid lakes, as obviously prevention is far better, and the u.s. epa seems to have done a good job at prevention. however, their voracious filter feeding has had some unexpected partially beneficial effects
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,037
44
48
concise as mud?????

You are just here to throw it and not actually contribute, EH?

I asked some simple questions earlier. Why don't you step up and answer them for us.
Here they are again,

I was hoping that someone could explain to me the idea of planting trees or creating forests as a carbon offset? Eg:Are forests better than desserts in terms of the amount of co2 in the atmosphere?

Does anyone know what the percentage of the total co2 put into the atmosphere each year is man made as opposed to from nature?

Look forward to your response. Shouldn't take to long should it. I mean you aren't going to need to search Wikipedia are you? You already know these answers, don't you?
Asked and answered. This is not a 1+1 type question (the one underlined) now, is it DICK? But the question in bold is, a six grader can answer that. If you don't know the answer to that question, you don't belong in this thread.

you just asked the REALLY big question there - and the normal sources of information are clogged up with the results of the global warming debate... also known as the co2 lies (and i'm including both pro and con in the category 'lies')

you're going to have to dig pretty deep for the answer to that question - a LOT deeper than the perb lounge. lol
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,037
44
48
Really!!!
That's what you got??
2 questions and you couldn't answer 1
Yet, you know I am wrong, EH. How????
No answers just rhetoric.
Go home
Forest absorbs CO2 and sand is CO2 neutral. There's the answer to your kindergarten question. As for the other one: "Does anyone know what the percentage of the total co2 put into the atmosphere each year is man made as opposed to from nature?" That's like asking if you know how many liters of water are in the ocean? Unquantifiable with our current technology.

It's pretty obvious which side of the fence you are standing on this issue, based on your "slow down and relax" paragraph. Bye troll...
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,037
44
48
LuckyDicky, I surrender to your awesome high school science knowledge. Nothing is created nor destroyed, ok got it. But absorption and deferral of release of CO2 are the key here.

Please enlighten me how you are going to know the percentage of the total CO2 put into the atmosphere each year is man made as opposed to from naturw. That implies one would have to measure the CO2 output before human existed. See the paradox there? Good luck with that one.
 

CptSisko

Banned
Sep 18, 2013
2
0
0
Captains log: Stardate 1330.1
Moderator has transported Captain James T. Kirk down to surface of planet Rigel XII to acquire replacement lithium crystals. Expected return date: Never.
Really? Don't think that will work. What are Lithium crystals used for? Are they anything like Dilithium?
 

mik

Banned
Dec 25, 2004
773
2
0
I was never gone.....
Stay tuned for the return of Captain Dunsel.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/NgO_y57_078?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

Dark_Knight

I'm Batman
Nov 23, 2003
1,287
7
38
Here
A managed forest system is not carbon negative. You cant simply plant trees and harvest them over and over. It is simply a tree farm.

As I think about it I start to laugh and then I actually get angry when I am confronted with such illogical thinking. A managed forest is so far from being something that removes carbon from our atmosphere that to suggest it is, is absurd. I base this on a few minutes of thought and reasoning.
It is better to be silent and thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.
 

Dark_Knight

I'm Batman
Nov 23, 2003
1,287
7
38
Here
Really?
Wanna play? This is the second slag in two days. You even posted repeatedly in the thread that you condemned me for starting. Whatever works in the moment for you I guess?
You must have me confused with someone else. I never condemned you for starting any threads.
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,491
8
38
on yer ignore list
Ancient Forest Thaws From Melting Glacial Tomb

By Laura Poppick, Staff Writer | LiveScience.com – Fri, 20 Sep, 2013

http://www.livescience.com/39819-ancient-forest-thaws.html

An ancient forest has thawed from under a melting glacier in Alaska and is now exposed to the world for the first time in more than 1,000 years.

Stumps and logs have been popping out from under southern Alaska's Mendenhall Glacier — a 36.8-square-mile (95.3 square kilometers) river of ice flowing into a lake near Juneau — for nearly the past 50 years. However, just within the past year or so, researchers based at the University of Alaska Southeast in Juneau have noticed considerably more trees popping up, many in their original upright position and some still bearing roots and even a bit of bark, the Juneau Empire first reported last week.

"There are a lot of them, and being in a growth position is exciting because we can see the outermost part of the tree and count back to see how old the tree was," Cathy Connor, a geology professor at the University of Alaska Southeast who was involved in the investigation, told LiveScience's OurAmazingPlanet. "Mostly, people find chunks of wood helter-skelter, but to see these intact upright is kind of cool."

The team has tentatively identified the trees as either spruce or hemlock, based on the diameter of the trunks and because these are the types of trees growing in the region today, Connor said, but the researchers still need to further assess the samples to verify the tree type.

A protective tomb of gravel likely encased the trees more than 1,000 years ago, when the glacier was advancing, Connor said, basing the date on radiocarbon ages of the newly revealed wood. As glaciers advance, Connor explained, they often emit summer meltwater streams that spew aprons of gravel beyond the glacier's edge.

A gravel layer about 4 to 5 feet (1.2 to 1.5 meters) high appears to have encased the trees before the glacier ultimately advanced enough to plow over them, snapping off limbs and preserving the stumps in an ice tomb.

Taku Glacier, located south of Juneau, is currently triggering this same process as it advances over a modern forest of cottonwood trees, offering the researchers a chance to observe the process in real time, Connor said.

Unlike the growing Taku Glacier, which accumulates snow at a high elevation and thus is well situated to grow, the lower-elevation Mendenhall Glacier has retreated by an average rate of about 170 feet (52 m) per year since 2005. This year's summer retreat has not yet been calculated, but the team expects it to be relatively high due to unusually warm summer temperatures, Connor said.

Glacial retreat worries many locals who are concerned about the threat of rising sea levels and loss of major freshwater sources that they rely on for drinking water. Anchorage, the state's most populated city, relies entirely on the retreating Eklutna Glacier for its drinking water.

Still, glacial retreat does offer an interesting opportunity to investigate well-preserved remnants of an ancient world. The team plans to return to the Mendenhall Glacier to dig through sediment in search of pine needles associated with the trees, along with other vegetation. They also plan to measure the growth bands of the trees to determine how old the trees were when they died.

"These are relict stories, and piecing them together with radiocarbon dating and stratigraphic work would help piece together the chapters of the story," Connor said.

The researchers have not yet published the results from the investigation but plan to do so once they have gathered more data.
so now... what's THIS all about? :confused:

let me get this straight... glaciers are melting in alaska - hmmm... no surprise there

but there's evidence being revealed by the melting that there were FORESTS growing 1,000 years ago, where there was only glacier ice until recently?!!!? wtf?

forests... but why? these dang glaciers must go up and down like a (pardon the expression) whore's drawers! and what could have caused the warming that melted the glaciers, that allowed the forests to grow, that were later inundated by glacial ice, that are now being revealed again by the melting glaciers?

an excess of co2? those danged pesky white europeans again - burning coal and ?petroleum? in 1013!! and here i thought we were doing something unique in the history of the world... dang it all anyway! :mad:

***edit:

the perfidity of journalists never ceases to amaze me, pardners - how the heck a SCIENCE editor can opine that the scientists will be looking for pine needles at the base of hemlock or spruce trees does make one wonder... :confused:
 
Last edited:

Flanders

Chronic User
Jun 16, 2011
516
0
0
It is better to be silent and thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.
Really?
Wanna play? This is the second slag in two days. You even posted repeatedly in the thread that you condemned me for starting. Whatever works in the moment for you I guess?.....
You must have me confused with someone else. I never condemned you for starting any threads.
I did confuse you with someone else. Sorry.
hahahaha this is just too funny. How did Dark_Night know? How???? LOL

~bracing myself for condescending attempt at witty comeback~
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,491
8
38
on yer ignore list
NASA map plots where air pollution is most likely to kill you
sarah, thanks for this article

i can never read something like this without diving for my calculator to check the numbers and put things in perspective

according to information gleaned from wikipedia the avergae 2009 mortality rate worldwide was 8.37 deaths/1000 people/year. the 2009 world population was estimated at 7 billion. that translates to 58.6 million deaths in the world during 2009

the numbers of premature deaths due to air pollution,according to the article you posted, was 2.1 million. so this equals 3.6% of deaths are premature deaths due to air pollution. a significant number for sure

it would be nice to know how many years they are talking about when they say 'premature'

***edit***

i tracked down the original article to see what they meant by 'premature', whether it was one day, one week, one month, one year or one decade

http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/3/034005/article

it wasn't really a scientific paper, it was actually an 'environmental research letter' published in IOPScience in 2013 Environ. Res. Lett. 8, No. 3 by Raquel A Silva1, J Jason West1,23, Yuqiang Zhang1, Susan C Anenberg2, Jean-François Lamarque3, Drew T Shindell4, William J Collins5, Stig Dalsoren6, Greg Faluvegi4, Gerd Folberth7, Larry W Horowitz8, Tatsuya Nagashima9, Vaishali Naik10, Steven Rumbold7, Ragnhild Skeie6, Kengo Sudo11, Toshihiko Takemura12, Daniel Bergmann13, Philip Cameron-Smith13, Irene Cionni14, Ruth M Doherty15, Veronika Eyring16, Beatrice Josse17, I A MacKenzie15, David Plummer18, Mattia Righi16, David S Stevenson15, Sarah Strode19,20, Sophie Szopa21 and Guang Zeng22 entitled Global premature mortality due to anthropogenic outdoor air pollution and the contribution of past climate change

IOPScience is published by IOPPublishing.org The following is their self-desciption:
IOP Publishing provides publications through which leading-edge scientific research is distributed worldwide. IOP Publishing is central to the Institute of Physics (IOP), a not-for-profit society. Any financial surplus earned by IOP Publishing goes to support science through the activities of IOP.

Beyond our traditional journals programme, we make high-value scientific information easily accessible through an ever-evolving portfolio of community websites, magazines, conference proceedings and a multitude of electronic services. Focused on making the most of new technologies, we’re continually improving our electronic interfaces to make it easier for researchers to find exactly what they need, when they need it, in the format that suits them best. Find out more at ioppublishing.org.
so, the upshot of my reading is that they don't define 'premature' anywhere in their 'letter'. it appears that they assume that premature deaths follows the concentration of ozone and fine particulates on a 1:1 basis, then they just present modelled information about increases in ground level ozone and fine particulates

so now i'm less trustful of the science behind the map

just sayin' :)
 
Last edited:
Vancouver Escorts