The "B" Word

[Maury Beniowski]

I might have added a kick in the balls (assuming he has any left), too. I'm talking about generalities. One only has to look at some of the fawning postings from certain perberts towards their favoured SP's - and that's AFTER paying money for it like there was a favour done.

I think you might be referring to lapdogs, and yes there are lots of them out there. Insecure twits...

Better not to wed a lady smarter than you. Sooner or later, she will whip you into submission. As soon at that lady has the upper hand, then it's a losing cause, so the wise man packs up and leaves. There are too many fine, beautiful and unattached women out there - whose IQ equates their bra size - to waste on a slave driver who always keeps the bottomless job jar full...

so if the woman suggests it, I'm ok with taking more of the initiative.. although I think a 50-50 partnership or maybe a slight 55/45 in favour of the male is the best way to go.

Fuck the 50-50 or anything under 100. My equation goes something like this: Spend your own fucking money and lay off mine. Anything less, and the pussy-whipping starts... Agreed?

 

[georgebushmoron]

...
I'm curious... what makes a man submit to being pussy whipped? Is it fear of loss or hope for gain? I just think it's pathetic and it gives our gender a bad rep. These guys are giving 95% to 100% of the control to their wife or gf. Personally, I would never submit to anything over 50-50 in her favour. I'm ok with having 55%, 60% or even up to 80% of the control in my favour (there's the 80-20 rule again... anything over 80 probably isn't healthy) depending on the situation and what each brings to the table. Many women like it when the man has more control. They see it as masculine and powerful and prefer if the man takes the lead... so if the woman suggests it, I'm ok with taking more of the initiative.. although I think a 50-50 partnership or maybe a slight 55/45 in favour of the male is the best way to go.

My guess is that the arrival of kids makes a man pussy whipped. I don't know for sure cuz I don't have kids and I don't like to hang around anyone who does. But my guess is that once kids arrive, the wife starts to want to control the household income - which means the man's money. Once a man lets his money be controlled by anyone other than himself, he's a prisoner. He effectively becomes her slave - going to work, come home, open the wallet, and she uses it as she sees fit. I'd be interested in knowing if there are any men out there who have a wife and kids, but manage to not be pussy whipped or let the woman control everything.

Women are a contradiction to themselves. You are right about them desiring a man who is powerful and takes the lead, but then they also want more control. Thus they are a recipe for their own unhappiness, if left to their own devices. A woman who pussy whips a man, and a man who allows it, is a woman who surely is going to become dissatisfied with her marriage eventually.

Because of this, I believe that men should always set the agenda, tempo, and timing of any relationship. If he sets it to the dissatisfaction of the woman, then she can leave on her own accord. If she stays, she stays because she needs or desires him. If she needs him, a man is usually happy to feel needed. If she desires him, a man is surely going to get great sex. If a woman sets the agenda, tempo and timing of the relationship, there could only be relationship disaster - he will not feel needed but used, he will not feel desired but be a token for her sexual gratification. And everybody knows that the average woman can go out and get laid by plenty of guys, so her being bored of you sexually is not a good thing. Whereas the average man can not get laid even given 20 times the amount of women around him, so he would better tolerate being bored of her sexually. At least he can just get off with her and be done with it, whereas she typically needs all this romance and more and more lovers as she goes further along to get satisfaction if she is bored of her man.

 

[maverick73]

My guess is that the arrival of kids makes a man pussy whipped. I don't know for sure cuz I don't have kids and I don't like to hang around anyone who does. But my guess is that once kids arrive, the wife starts to want to control the household income - which means the man's money. Once a man lets his money be controlled by anyone other than himself, he's a prisoner. He effectively becomes her slave - going to work, come home, open the wallet, and she uses it as she sees fit. I'd be interested in knowing if there are any men out there who have a wife and kids, but manage to not be pussy whipped or let the woman control everything.

Ok this is an interesting discussion. Here's some cases I know of:

1. The super pussywhipped guy I was talking about in my previous posts was about to break up with a long term gf after many years of a relationship. They got back together, he became pussy whipped even before they got married, was at the same level of pussywhippedness after he got married, but got even MORE pussywhipped after their first child. I would rank this person 75% pussywhipped before the kid, and 100% pussywhipped after the kid. He's the perfect example of who I do NOT want to be.

2. The guy that used to work on cars with me got pussywhipped the minute he got a girlfriend. They moved in together but not sure if they ever got married (I honestly severely doubt it with the amount of control she had over him... I have faith my friend eventually snapped out of it). I should try to contact him and see what happened. I would rank this guy 50% pussywhipped last time I saw him.

3. 1 guy was average before marriage, and is only semi pussywhipped now that he's married. They have no kids. Actually, he's probably only 25% pussywhipped. He does his own thing, but once in a while has to succumb to the wife's wishes. Complains his wife is high maintenance.

4. 1 guy was married, had a kid, divorced, remarried, had another kid. I would say he's 0% pussywhipped. It's a great partnership. Looks like he found what he wanted 2nd time around. Very happy relationship for both partners!

5. Next guy just had a kid. I would actually say he's 0% pussywhipped to be honest. Been with the wife over a decade (college sweethearts). He has his wife and kid responsibilities, but it's a give and take relationship. Good balance. He does his own thing, she does hers, they do things together. All major decisions are shared. Wife likes me. I like her. I hope to have a relationship like his in about 10 years. Good friend of mine.

6. Next guy I know that is married I would say is only about 25% pussywhipped, but only because I hear his wife grumbling about his activities. I know he doesn't take any shit from her, so that is why I say 25% pussywhipped because his wife tries to pussywhip him and he resists.

7. Next guy is 0% pussywhipped. Married, older, no kids (wife is infertile... too old to have kids). They are both business people.

8. Next guy same as #7. Wife too old to have kids. Great relationship of 25 years I think? One of the best I've ever seen. I know he wanted to fuck my young and fit ex though . That's ok cuz I wanted to fuck his older and fit wife too LOL. 0% pussywhipped.

9. Ok last guy... married, no kids, 25% pussywhipped, but accepts it and enjoys it. He's what I call "pussywhipped by choice." He doesn't mind it and thinks it's normal, which is ok I guess! Nothing wrong with that.

I would say 25% pussywhippedness is ok, and maybe even "normal" in that it's ingrained into women to want this to properly raise a family. Anything 50% and higher and I think that leads to eventual unhappiness... and either divorce or "staying together for the sake of the kids or fear of not finding somebody else before dying."

 

[lenny]

I'm curious... what makes a man submit to being pussy whipped?

More pussy, i would assume.

Less time spent with you/BF = more time with GF = more pussy.
Simple Math ;

 

[Maury Beniowski]

When I grew up not all that long ago a pimp was the lowest form of life on the planet. Violent ignorant scum preying on the defenseless was how they were properly viewed. Now you have some clown on the WWF singing "pimping ain't easy" and you have a mainstream TV show "Pimp my ride". I can understand girls working for themselves and appreciate them but pimps turn my stomach and now they are freaking heroes. I'm getting old

Pimps were, and in some circles are still reviled, because they represent the absolute loss of control for women.

 

[georgebushmoron]

Pimps were, and in some circles are still reviled, because they represent the absolute loss of control for women.

I know of an owner of a particular AMP who insists on doing BB couch interviews and free lays every once in awhile. This guy is going to get what's coming to him.