While recording a session for me has no appeal and is not something I would ever be interested in personally, I find the indignity expressed by both providers and customers (in defense of providers) amusing.
To wit, gentlemen: have you considered the number of incalls which contain cameras? Think about it: your dealing with not only girls' safety, but also large amounts of untraceable cash; of course there are cameras, almost always. For certain with nearly every (if not every) agency, as well as most (if not all) timeshared incalls that indies go in on, there are cameras.
And be not swayed by, "it's for my safety" or, "it's just for business, and then they're all deleted" ; SP's are in this for money, thus they record for monetary concerns, and clients are in it for sexual pleasure, thus they record for sexual concerns, which is equitable in the deceit of each. While not all do it, there are those on both sides of the fence, both recording as discreetly as possible and without consent, and certainly next to none will admit it. It only takes the smallest amount of reasoning, and you will realize that we customers are recorded far more frequently than SP's are, in general.
Furthermore, a claim towards safety could be made on both sides, though a man is less likely to do so for being emasculated & shamed as a result of doing so, however I would suggest that customers are threatened/ robbed/ assaulted more frequently than the other way around, and could make a strong argument in support of my suggestion if necessary.
To wit, gentlemen: have you considered the number of incalls which contain cameras? Think about it: your dealing with not only girls' safety, but also large amounts of untraceable cash; of course there are cameras, almost always. For certain with nearly every (if not every) agency, as well as most (if not all) timeshared incalls that indies go in on, there are cameras.
And be not swayed by, "it's for my safety" or, "it's just for business, and then they're all deleted" ; SP's are in this for money, thus they record for monetary concerns, and clients are in it for sexual pleasure, thus they record for sexual concerns, which is equitable in the deceit of each. While not all do it, there are those on both sides of the fence, both recording as discreetly as possible and without consent, and certainly next to none will admit it. It only takes the smallest amount of reasoning, and you will realize that we customers are recorded far more frequently than SP's are, in general.
Furthermore, a claim towards safety could be made on both sides, though a man is less likely to do so for being emasculated & shamed as a result of doing so, however I would suggest that customers are threatened/ robbed/ assaulted more frequently than the other way around, and could make a strong argument in support of my suggestion if necessary.





