Sound Off - Real Photos vs Photoshopped Pics vs Fake Photos

[pervypervison]

A recent review has kicked off another debate around authenticity of photos online. I know the regulars all have their own preferences and thoughts towards this topic, but for any people just getting into this hobby, i know it's probably one of the most concerning things...."who is actually going to be greeting me at the door??"

It's not a good feeling when you're completely disappointed because you were expecting something totally different. On the flip side, you feel like you won a small lottery when the girl is even better in real life.

As a cheat sheet for a newbie, hopefully this helps a little and then others can provide their experiences as well:

KoreanVIP69 - Real photos
Icon604 - Mostly real photos (touched up/filtered)
Foxy604 - All photos are fake, but generally try to give you an idea of the body type
Korean604 - All photos are fake, but generally try to give you an idea of the body type
Xiao Dim Sum - All photos are fake, but generally try to give you an idea of the body type
DayNight - All photos are fake, but generally try to give you an idea of the body type
Private Paradise - All photos are fake, but generally try to give you an idea of the body type
Yumikolove - Photos vary, but are tagged as 'similar' or '100% real'
AsianFever - Real photos (touched up)

Not to state the obvious, but of course the faces shown in the photos can never be used as a reliable comparison. Real photos will generally have the face cropped out, or blurred out. Fake photos will show the face, but don't expect that in person.

@crazzyyphotonzz @Bluesmile86 @GATSBY @southcentralperb @Melonbread , we can continue the conversation here and let the other chat stay focused on Sydney

 

[randomguy2817]

while I do like kvip69, nowadays the new comers to the shop pictures are all fake.

 

[pervypervison]

while I do like kvip69, nowadays the new comers to the shop pictures are all fake.

I was wondering about that. I'm waiting for @Bobert1969 to verify how closely Spring matches her photos. To be honest, none of the real photos of Celine, Chloe, or Icy really did it for me when i first visited their site. I couldn't understand the higher rates they were charging. But after reading so many positive reviews, i decided to try them all (almost)....and each were better than i expected.

definitely no perfect way to approach this.....unless all the girls have professional shots done. I like the fact that AF has that consistency with all their photos. But if a provider is only planning to be in town for a few weeks, i can see why neither them or the agency could be bothered to get better photos online for their profile.

 

[randomguy2817]

I was wondering about that. I'm waiting for @Bobert1969 to verify how closely Spring matches her photos. To be honest, none of the real photos of Celine, Chloe, or Icy really did it for me when i first visited their site. I couldn't understand the higher rates they were charging. But after reading so many positive reviews, i decided to try them all (almost)....and each were better than i expected.

definitely no perfect way to approach this.....unless all the girls have professional shots done. I like the fact that AF has that consistency with all their photos. But if a provider is only planning to be in town for a few weeks, i can why neither them or the agency could be bothered to get better photos online for their profile.

understandable, it is difficult like you said because if they're in town for a couple weeks, no point of professional shots like AF. Rather I like Icy/Giselle @ YL approach of just using her selfies, thats if they're comfortable with showing their face.

I'm the opposite from you with Icy, Chloe and Celine, all their real photos drew me in compared to the others. And like you, they were better than expected when seeing them in person.

 

[Bluesmile86]

it's the above attitude of the 2 gentlemen above me that is killing us here in Vancouver. we need to stop being ok with completely fake pics. a bit of photoshop is one thing, the fake pics are so fucking played out

Different strokes for different folks...no one is forcing anyone to go to these shops or spending $ with them...BUT:

• How likely will these shops start using real photos anytime soon = 99% NOT
• How likely will pooners continue to visit these shops despite fake pics = 99% YES

That's what PERB is for, sharing intel, as we can't change the way businesses are run....if you don't like what they offer, then go somewhere else.

 

[lookinfersum]

All of YL's photos are not fake - they do predominantly use fake pics - but they also label real pics with the "100% real" and a "Leolist-date" . I tend to find that these pics, which are usually taken in the in-call room are real - definitely shopped, but at least they give an idea of what to expect. Pics that don't have the "100% real" tag are fakies.
eg - YL "Neve" - the body shots are real but the 2 face pics included are not...
"Lumina" - also had real pics attached to her add....other pics where the setting has a palm tree in the background or a nice pool deck - consider them lifted from some other site

Lots of girls dont want real pics of them online associated with this business - for obvious reasons. If they still drum up business, then why would then be inclined to change? Way too late to get Providers to change their habbits -. Kudos to AF for not following that trend.

 

[SolidSnake]

Daynight: Kitty (formerly at Yumiko), Jenny (aka Sugar at Yumiko), Ayumi have real pics. Look up my reviews. Ain't worth repeat (Kitty, Ayumi) or even a try (Jenny.)

 

[grusse]

Daynight: Kitty (formerly at Yumiko), Jenny (aka Sugar at Yumiko), Ayumi have real pics. Look up my reviews. Ain't worth repeat (Kitty, Ayumi) or even a try (Jenny.)

I searched 10 pages but couldn't find your review of Kitty?
Would it have been deleted?
real pics but crap service it seems?damn, photos are a temptation,lol.

 

[crazzyyphotonzz]

This thread has some great information.
Thanks all

 

[SolidSnake]

I searched 10 pages but couldn't find your review of Kitty?
Would it have been deleted?
real pics but crap service it seems?damn, photos are a temptation,lol.

Had to use Advanced Search to dig it up.
https://perb.cc/xenforo/threads/kitty-yumikolove.273890/post-2016084

 

[crazzyyphotonzz]

So, in all - Kvip69, icon604 and AF mostly have real pictures.
Rest all are fake but give a general idea about the body type.

 

[crazzyyphotonzz]

Another quick question I had -
For the session, do multiple girls have the same places or each girl has their own?

Is it something that each agency has a few buildings across town and the girls each have a room in it? Or agencies just put the clients in touch with the girls.

 

[pervypervison]

All of YL's photos are not fake - they do predominantly use fake pics - but they also label real pics with the "100% real" and a "Leolist-date" . I tend to find that these pics, which are usually taken in the in-call room are real - definitely shopped, but at least they give an idea of what to expect. Pics that don't have the "100% real" tag are fakies.
eg - YL "Neve" - the body shots are real but the 2 face pics included are not...
"Lumina" - also had real pics attached to her add....other pics where the setting has a palm tree in the background or a nice pool deck - consider them lifted from some other site

Lots of girls dont want real pics of them online associated with this business - for obvious reasons. If they still drum up business, then why would then be inclined to change? Way too late to get Providers to change their habbits -. Kudos to AF for not following that trend.

thanks for the insight. i've made the correction.

 

[southcentralperb]

ok so icon and kvip69 have real-ish pics. those would be the only websites/ads i would look at on a regular basis then, because i have no use for looking at new postings with completely fake pics that haven't been backed up by an accurate and detailed review. like i said in the other thread, i normally go to AMP's so i can see the lineup. i don't like surprises. on the rare occasion that i do use some of these agencies, i have 1 of 3 reactions:
1) wow that was a fucking disappointment. i'm walking. i hope i don't get blacklisted now
2) eh, she's not what i expected, but she's alright, so i guess i'll stay
3) wow she's gorgeous, i can't believe she isn't using real pics, she would get so much more business if she did

#1 is a huge time waster and blue baller. #2 is probably the most common and i'm kind of over it. i'm trying to limit my spending and spend my time and $$$ more wisely on quality girls. the girls in this category usually aren't worth it for me. #3 is great but just not worth the risk and time investment imo. i would rather just know up front. even a review only gets you so far as people have vastly different tastes, and also supply varying amounts of detail. AMG is one of the most accurate and descriptive reviewers when it comes to looks imo. most people don't supply enough information or the right information for me, unfortunately. so, to the AMP's i go

 

[blakealridge]

All my pics are fake

 

[jgg]

All the pictures in the ads are real. The people in the ads are real. They just dont coinside.

 

[Oldfart]

All the pictures in the ads are real. The people in the ads are real. They just dont coinside.

I assume that when our friend pervypervison says a photo is "fake" he means it was stolen from another source, rather than created by Artificial Intelligence.

 

[Asian Fever]

KoreanVIP69 - Real photos

Dunno, just checked a couple photos... Snow's pics are stolen. I could check the rest but made the point already.

https://twitter.com/lauraspang7?lang=en

Icon604 - Mostly real photos (touched up/filtered)

http://blog.livedoor.jp/koreanbeautykomaoyo-69/archives/36539631.html

yoo-ri's pics come from a Japanese website. her or not you be the judge. I didn't check more.


You guys should get versed on google reverse image search (you can add a chrome extension) and tineye. Super useful.

 

[crazzyyphotonzz]

Dunno, just checked a couple photos... Snow's pics are stolen. I could check the rest but made the point already. https://twitter.com/lauraspang7?lang=en http://blog.livedoor.jp/koreanbeautykomaoyo-69/archives/36539631.html yoo-ri's pics come from a Japanese website. her or not you be the judge. I didn't check more. You guys should get versed on google reverse image search (you can add a chrome extension) and tineye. Super useful. Asian Fever, what is your opinion about icon604? How are the pictures there? Apart from yoo-ri

 

[Asian Fever]

Asian Fever, what is your opinion about icon604? How are the pictures there? Apart from yoo-ri

Yuna as another example. You guys can easily do these searches yourself.


Here is a link to the ChromeLens browser extension. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chromelens/

Right-click an image, then choose search for an image on google... by default it will show you like where to buy her outfit, but click "find image source" and presto. Remember that people may do things like add watermarks, distort the image, or flip it, to try and stop you from finding the source. If a shop uses fake photos at all, then you cant trust any of them as its already been shown not the be trustworthy... not saying the girl is bad or whatever, the topic here is photos.