Sisters!!!!!
- Thread starter bonger
- Start date
- Status
Well if your asking me....
I'd say I wouldn't do it....but I wouldn't pimp anyone.
I'd also say due to family roles its inappropriate....but that's just me, just a sujective call on the matter.
As far as two sisters, or twins....for me that title is just that. A title. If I never knew they were sisters would it be wrong? If they didn't even know that they were sisters would it be wrong? Less wrong IMO than if they were unrelated but raised as family. But in that scenario all I am thinking about is being with two beautiful girls....at that point the testosterone shuts off the chemical in my brain that may make me want to reconsider.
I'd say I wouldn't do it....but I wouldn't pimp anyone.
I'd also say due to family roles its inappropriate....but that's just me, just a sujective call on the matter.
As far as two sisters, or twins....for me that title is just that. A title. If I never knew they were sisters would it be wrong? If they didn't even know that they were sisters would it be wrong? Less wrong IMO than if they were unrelated but raised as family. But in that scenario all I am thinking about is being with two beautiful girls....at that point the testosterone shuts off the chemical in my brain that may make me want to reconsider.
I'd be awfully tempted by these sisters.
Now I'm not going to debate right or wrong, I'm just saying that if any of these twins ever propositioned me, I'd have a hard time turning them down.
Now I'm not going to debate right or wrong, I'm just saying that if any of these twins ever propositioned me, I'd have a hard time turning them down.
Now for a serious answer: what is your problem? First bonger tells us about a wild time he has with sisters, then you let him know how wrong he was for doing it. But do you think he forced them into it? Did you stop to think that what the girls did might just be a very convincing show? You realize that they are sp's and make their living's from entertaining clients? Now, I'm trying not to be rude but before you jump on someone for their experiences, you should think things through. Maybe give him a high five or something.Avery said:
Way to go, They are adults, and if they chose to do business this way, so be it. Who are we to judge when we spend our lives in secret and avoid being found out at all costs? We are certainly brave on here, but honestly, We should be just as ashamed of ourselves for perpetuating it.That's why this site is addicting, and people come to it by the thousands.We are all equally sick or we wouldn't be here. The annonimity is what will keeps us coming back. IMHO, I think it is wrong, but what do I know? I know I wouldn't, and that's good enough for me. I love my sisters don't get me wrong, but I would never get them to fuck someone else in front of me. What would I do, give them pointers? I don't think so....
Sisters
I'm sitting here reading all of these opinions....and that's what they are "opinions"..... regarding this topic.......and....
And all I can do is relate back to some old adages from my parents and from time gone by that bring some context to the whole topic for me anyway:
1) "People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones"
Unless your free of any "wrong" in your past or present...who are we to "condemn" somone for theirs. Are we allowed our opinions.... sure..... but not to the point of "implied condemnation"
2) "You need to hear both sides of the story"
If you don't know both sides of the story how can you comment on someone's intentions or state of mind.
3) "Run your own life....... you'll live longer"
I can't even keep my life on the striaght and narrow never mind being resident expert on someone else's.
Now please don't take any of this the wrong way....this is just my "opinion"
I'm sitting here reading all of these opinions....and that's what they are "opinions"..... regarding this topic.......and....
And all I can do is relate back to some old adages from my parents and from time gone by that bring some context to the whole topic for me anyway:
1) "People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones"
Unless your free of any "wrong" in your past or present...who are we to "condemn" somone for theirs. Are we allowed our opinions.... sure..... but not to the point of "implied condemnation"
2) "You need to hear both sides of the story"
If you don't know both sides of the story how can you comment on someone's intentions or state of mind.
3) "Run your own life....... you'll live longer"
I can't even keep my life on the striaght and narrow never mind being resident expert on someone else's.
Now please don't take any of this the wrong way....this is just my "opinion"
I agree. This board isn't the place where people should be proclaiming their morality. I'm glad that people here have a sense of morality, but once "Pandora's Box" is opened it opens the board to a whole new dimension of flaming and personally I'm not interested in going that route.
Again, I'm certainly not dissing anyone's opinion on this thread... I just think there's a time and place for it and it's not here.
Once again, only an opinion among many, none better or worse than any others mentioned.
Again, I'm certainly not dissing anyone's opinion on this thread... I just think there's a time and place for it and it's not here.
Once again, only an opinion among many, none better or worse than any others mentioned.
Horse1957 said:
Last edited:
Imho
Bonger boinked these sisters at the same time, sweet hotties, who are as normal as other sp's and most women. (I am sure they never put on as wild a show as some of our perbites witnessed with their favorites Kerry and Mandy and I think Bonger was more into having the 2 girls working him over instead of just being a voyeur. For that he could just rent a video!!!!
The ladies at Broadway's are nice and don't warrant some of the criticism given on here. The place should be remodelled, but that should not be a reflection on the ladies. Most of them do try to be friendly and provide good service. If they don't then there won't be many repeats. My opinion.
My opinion, for what it's worth - at least 2 cents!!bonger said:
Bonger boinked these sisters at the same time, sweet hotties, who are as normal as other sp's and most women. (I am sure they never put on as wild a show as some of our perbites witnessed with their favorites Kerry and Mandy and I think Bonger was more into having the 2 girls working him over instead of just being a voyeur. For that he could just rent a video!!!!
The ladies at Broadway's are nice and don't warrant some of the criticism given on here. The place should be remodelled, but that should not be a reflection on the ladies. Most of them do try to be friendly and provide good service. If they don't then there won't be many repeats. My opinion.
All of a sudden people in this game have caught a dose of morality.
Get this - WERE ALL PAYING FOR SEX and THE WOMEN ARE SELLING THEMSELVES TO US ... get a grip ... yeah, I want a guy to lick my balls - grab a brain, like I said that.
People twist everything around on here to critize posters.
There are some days I HATE THIS BOARD ... heaven forbid someone has an opinion.
Get this - WERE ALL PAYING FOR SEX and THE WOMEN ARE SELLING THEMSELVES TO US ... get a grip ... yeah, I want a guy to lick my balls - grab a brain, like I said that.
People twist everything around on here to critize posters.
There are some days I HATE THIS BOARD ... heaven forbid someone has an opinion.
For the record, I haven't felt like I've been "flamed" by anyone on this board.
I've nevered had a duo with Kerry and Mandy before but I'm sure what I experienced with Cleo and Ricki isn't as wild as that would be, but I prefer younger girls (I'm pretty young myself) and when I can afford to indulge, I think I'll have another duo with the sisters.
I've nevered had a duo with Kerry and Mandy before but I'm sure what I experienced with Cleo and Ricki isn't as wild as that would be, but I prefer younger girls (I'm pretty young myself) and when I can afford to indulge, I think I'll have another duo with the sisters.
Like Bonger, I see no flaming whatsoever in this thread. A lot of people expressed their opinions. Sure, there were differences, but no one attacked anyone else.
We all draw a moral line somewhere. Some said it wasn't OK for sisters to do duos at all; others said it was OK as long as they weren't interactive. No one said it was OK for sisters to do an interactive duo. So, in a sense, everyone drew a line in one of two places. Besides, the two sisters in this thread didn't do each other anyway, according to Bonger.
Sorry for repeating myself, but, Marshall, as far as "catching a dose of morality" is concerned, are you saying that, for example, if someone made a post looking for an underaged SP, we should remain silent? All of us here are libertarians to varying degrees, but I'm pretty sure no one here thinks that would be all right. That's a moral judgement (and a legal one too, for that matter).
We all draw a moral line somewhere. Some said it wasn't OK for sisters to do duos at all; others said it was OK as long as they weren't interactive. No one said it was OK for sisters to do an interactive duo. So, in a sense, everyone drew a line in one of two places. Besides, the two sisters in this thread didn't do each other anyway, according to Bonger.
Sorry for repeating myself, but, Marshall, as far as "catching a dose of morality" is concerned, are you saying that, for example, if someone made a post looking for an underaged SP, we should remain silent? All of us here are libertarians to varying degrees, but I'm pretty sure no one here thinks that would be all right. That's a moral judgement (and a legal one too, for that matter).
Given that morality is an individual issue and given that everyone here has moral grounds to differing degrees.... the point is that if we start engaging in "moral" debates (even though posters may have a valid points and many may agree with the poster on moral grounds), that hypothetically opens the doors to anyone posting a "moral" response to ANY post in ANY given thread about ANY subject. To then deny a poster the right to respond to any post on any moral ground would be to enforce one set of moral beliefs over anothers. Again, please, not trying to start an argument with anyone, simply engaging in a (quite good) intellectual discussion.
At best, any moral debates should be started in the general discussion area, not in the review section. Not the place for it.
At best, any moral debates should be started in the general discussion area, not in the review section. Not the place for it.
Last edited:
The basic reason incest is bad is that it promotes inbreeding, which is evolutionarily hazardous. The other main negative is abuse of power/authority relationships.
Neither is an issue here. They can't knock each other up and make mongoloid babies, neither is a child, and they are peers not adult/dependent.
There's no overriding rational basis for an absolute moral ban, only the minor discomfort of the unusualness of sisters fucking. This kind of thing is merely wierd, abnormal, and unhealthy, rather than malignant like other forms of incest.
Neither is an issue here. They can't knock each other up and make mongoloid babies, neither is a child, and they are peers not adult/dependent.
There's no overriding rational basis for an absolute moral ban, only the minor discomfort of the unusualness of sisters fucking. This kind of thing is merely wierd, abnormal, and unhealthy, rather than malignant like other forms of incest.
- Status
