I just had a doubles session with Cleo (one of my favs) and her younger sister Ricki at Broadways. Talk about a dream come true. Like almost every man, my fantasy was to be with two beautiful women at once, but for them to be sisters!!!! WOW! Both are young hotties. Ricki, about 18 or 19 years old, is very new (been working part-time for the last month) but her big sister Cleo, about 22 or 23 years old, sure knows how to get her going!!! Rates are $300 for 1/2 and $400 for one hour, plus room fee. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
Sisters!!!!!
- Thread starter bonger
- Start date
- Status
If they really are sisters, that's pretty kinky! But, so are mother-daughter duos.
There was a mother-daughter duo in Winnipeg in the late eighties/early nineties in another MP/incall. I saw them both separately a couple of times, never together. In fact, I didn't know they were mother and daughter until well after the mother left the business, and the daughter told me. She said they didn't do much to each other, just play with each other's titties, but even that's really kinky, IMO.
There was a very famous mother/daughter duo in Montreal about five years ago. Jasmine is the mother - she's now about 52 and still in the business as Lili Love. She looks at least ten years younger than her true age, and has a well-deserved worldwide reputation for her blowjobs. The daughter (Sasha) is about 33 and is no longer in the business. The owner of the agency at the time (Alexandra) tried to get a buddy of mine to see them as a duo, and she coined a new word. She said they worked together, but they didn't "lesbianate". LOL! She said that would be really kinky!
There was a mother-daughter duo in Winnipeg in the late eighties/early nineties in another MP/incall. I saw them both separately a couple of times, never together. In fact, I didn't know they were mother and daughter until well after the mother left the business, and the daughter told me. She said they didn't do much to each other, just play with each other's titties, but even that's really kinky, IMO.
There was a very famous mother/daughter duo in Montreal about five years ago. Jasmine is the mother - she's now about 52 and still in the business as Lili Love. She looks at least ten years younger than her true age, and has a well-deserved worldwide reputation for her blowjobs. The daughter (Sasha) is about 33 and is no longer in the business. The owner of the agency at the time (Alexandra) tried to get a buddy of mine to see them as a duo, and she coined a new word. She said they worked together, but they didn't "lesbianate". LOL! She said that would be really kinky!
You've obviously never seen a porno. It's girl on girl, so what if they're sisters - I'm sure it's every man's fantasy - much like the mother/daughter thing Avery mentions.lickalot said:
If you think it's sick, you don't belong around this game. All it is - it's a little taboo.
Keep up the great work girls!
It may be some men's fantasy, but it's not mine.Marshall said:
Some things are more taboo than others, and for good reason. Just because it doesn't involve a father or brother penetrating a female family member doesn't make sister-sister or mother-daughter duos any less incestuous.
Have to agree with the majority. Incest is incest. Cousins are one thing but sisters and brothers and mothers and fathers...................pullllease!
I couldn't stand to see my brothers naked and never ever wanted to see my sisters or parents in their underwear never mind in the buff. How can a woman use a child sexually to give her pleasure with the same orifice that she brought that child into the world???
M
I couldn't stand to see my brothers naked and never ever wanted to see my sisters or parents in their underwear never mind in the buff. How can a woman use a child sexually to give her pleasure with the same orifice that she brought that child into the world???
M
You probably don't want to start a shit fest here about this do you? I just made a comment on the subject not an opinion. Besides, how can anyone argue morality on a board of this nature. Let it go. Let it go.Avery said:
I agree there are many men that would love to have a threesome with two sisters (a little bewildering for me ) to each is own.I personally agree with the majority(incest is incest) like the "Barbie Twins".It's not my mug of beer(cup of tea) a humble opinion.
) to each is own.I personally agree with the majority(incest is incest) like the "Barbie Twins".It's not my mug of beer(cup of tea) a humble opinion.
A fully "interactive" duo with sisters in my opinion is inappropriate even in this biz. It is incest, by definition, never mind majority rules.
If the client is getting action from the sisters and they are not "doing" eachother (keeping a "no sexual touching eachother" policy), but rather just watching eachother and doubling up on his massage or hj and then 'taking turns', it's not such an uncomfortable thought. (Still not 100% within my comfort zone, but who asked me anyway? I don't even have a sister (thank god!).)
(If I did, I'd probably fuck her for money, hmmm I'm KIDDING, relax.)
It is very erotic seeing two woman together, no doubt about that (COUNT ME IN!) but from the same family, ya gotta tame it down a bit, and not have the women actually be sexually interactive.
Maybe they could kiss eachother on the top of the head once they are done and covered in client jizz?
Or a high five... ("Good job, Sis!" "Yes it is!")
Sydney xo
If the client is getting action from the sisters and they are not "doing" eachother (keeping a "no sexual touching eachother" policy), but rather just watching eachother and doubling up on his massage or hj and then 'taking turns', it's not such an uncomfortable thought. (Still not 100% within my comfort zone, but who asked me anyway? I don't even have a sister (thank god!).)
(If I did, I'd probably fuck her for money, hmmm I'm KIDDING, relax.)
It is very erotic seeing two woman together, no doubt about that (COUNT ME IN!) but from the same family, ya gotta tame it down a bit, and not have the women actually be sexually interactive.
Maybe they could kiss eachother on the top of the head once they are done and covered in client jizz?
Or a high five... ("Good job, Sis!" "Yes it is!"
)Sydney xo
I expect sisters would be uncomfortable with eachother, and if they're not, they should be.
If they're twins however, it is desirable from an asthetic point of view, but it's still wrong. A good solution would be to have two completely different girls with the same hair style ...
Anyway, speaking of scandalous immorality that reminds me, Sydney, how was that big orgy a few weeks ago in Vancouver?
If they're twins however, it is desirable from an asthetic point of view, but it's still wrong. A good solution would be to have two completely different girls with the same hair style ...
Anyway, speaking of scandalous immorality that reminds me, Sydney, how was that big orgy a few weeks ago in Vancouver?
It was to be next weekend in Vancouver.gotsome2004 said:
But alas, ALBERTA was ALL OVER IT!
I expect it to be fabulous.
All involved (7 couples confirmed so far, 2 from Saskatoon, 2 from Calgary, 3 from Edmonton) are waiting for September 10th.
We are meeting in Edmonton. Very excited.
Thanks for asking.
Sydney xo
This fool!lickalot said:You've got to be kidding me!! So I guess you and your Bro in a threesome with some chick.... while he licks the bottom of your balls...is ok?
Maybe things are different in Brandon....I still think the tranny thing is more acceptable.
What is it with the freaks in Brandon anyway,something in the water?
This whole topic is actually quite amuzing from
my perspective. Maybe being a major in History and in Religious studies I see it in some different lights.
If you look at it being a bible-based morality issue then you also have to be real about the story of creation. If indeed Adam and Eve were the first two humans, had Cane, Abel, and Seth, and possibly some female siblings...then incest had to occur somewhere.
If you look at it being a non bible-based general morality issue, then you also need to be able to understand that even though you personally may not see this issue as being based in your religious beliefs it still very much is. Even our non secular beliefs in western society (in regards to morality and values) are still strongly shaped by our judeo-christian heritage. It saturates culture as a whole in ways we never think of at first glance. First in Europe, then when our ancestors came to Canada, the US, and even Mexico and Central America with the Christian influence coming in from the Spanish. So its not something that can just be seperated from our belief system and world view.
Also part of the reason incest is deemed taboo is socialogical. This coming in the way of familial roles. If you take on the role of brother, or the role of mother, or father, its deemed wrong to partake in sexual relations with another member of family based on that role. So in that sense you tell me what is worse....
Having sex with someone who was raised as your sister from childhood but is not blood relation?
Or
Having sex with someone who is genetically your sister whom you had never been raised with and is a new aquaintance?
So it would seem that the issue is more complex that a simple right or wrong, or being... or not being grossed out by the idea.
Of course from a genetic standpoint the high rates of retardation and birth defects would at least suggest that having sexual relations where copulation is the result is indeed against nature. So does that make sister on sister not wrong then due to no reproduction?
Who knows. For some its gross and that is fine...for others the taboo of it is a sexual turn on. And for others nailing two hot chicks at the same time is paramount even if they are sisters....that's beside the point for them. For me....I will say this...if I had the chance to be in a three way with Jenny McCarthy and her hot ass sister I wouldn't give it a second thought before doing it. But hey...that's me.
my perspective. Maybe being a major in History and in Religious studies I see it in some different lights.
If you look at it being a bible-based morality issue then you also have to be real about the story of creation. If indeed Adam and Eve were the first two humans, had Cane, Abel, and Seth, and possibly some female siblings...then incest had to occur somewhere.
If you look at it being a non bible-based general morality issue, then you also need to be able to understand that even though you personally may not see this issue as being based in your religious beliefs it still very much is. Even our non secular beliefs in western society (in regards to morality and values) are still strongly shaped by our judeo-christian heritage. It saturates culture as a whole in ways we never think of at first glance. First in Europe, then when our ancestors came to Canada, the US, and even Mexico and Central America with the Christian influence coming in from the Spanish. So its not something that can just be seperated from our belief system and world view.
Also part of the reason incest is deemed taboo is socialogical. This coming in the way of familial roles. If you take on the role of brother, or the role of mother, or father, its deemed wrong to partake in sexual relations with another member of family based on that role. So in that sense you tell me what is worse....
Having sex with someone who was raised as your sister from childhood but is not blood relation?
Or
Having sex with someone who is genetically your sister whom you had never been raised with and is a new aquaintance?
So it would seem that the issue is more complex that a simple right or wrong, or being... or not being grossed out by the idea.
Of course from a genetic standpoint the high rates of retardation and birth defects would at least suggest that having sexual relations where copulation is the result is indeed against nature. So does that make sister on sister not wrong then due to no reproduction?
Who knows. For some its gross and that is fine...for others the taboo of it is a sexual turn on. And for others nailing two hot chicks at the same time is paramount even if they are sisters....that's beside the point for them. For me....I will say this...if I had the chance to be in a three way with Jenny McCarthy and her hot ass sister I wouldn't give it a second thought before doing it. But hey...that's me.
Last edited:
- Status
