Sexless marriages

Bartdude

New member
Jul 5, 2006
1,251
5
0
Calgary
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090226.wlsexless26/BNStory/lifeFamily/home

Let's talk about my sexless marriage
Unfulfilled spouses are going on the Web to vent about low libidos, rejection and going years without so much as a kiss
ZOSIA BIELSKI
February 26, 2009 at 8:51 AM EST

Four years into Diane's marriage, her husband became "bothered" by the prospect of sleeping with her and moved into a room vacated by her grown daughter.

Fourteen years later, the Pennsylvania artist has still not had sex with her "emotionally closed off" husband, who has taken to masturbating to pornography in a separate building on their property.

"I can't remember the last time I got a hug. It's probably been a couple of years since I've even gotten any kind of a kiss," says Diane, who did not want her full name used.

She says initially children, and then money, have bound her to the marriage.

Frustrated, she joined the Experience Project last March. The website lets members post stories and comment on each other's tales in specialized forums, and the "I live in a sexless marriage" discussion board quickly became one of its most active.

Many members feel helpless and frantic, writing of marriages marred by little or no communication and habits that have solidified through circumstance and familiarity.

"A lot of times, you're just venting. ... The great majority of people [on the site] are very non-judgmental," Diane says.

It is just one of several websites where desperate partners commiserate and share self-help resources. About 20 million couples in the United States are in sexless marriages, according to recent reports - meaning they are sexually intimate 10 or fewer times in a year.

On other forums such as sexlessmarriage.yuku.com and loveshack.org, spouses left in the cold share fantasies, thoughts of affairs and even prayers. On the sites, they can finally discuss a reality that, offline, remains undisclosed.

"My wife and I have sex so little, maybe twice a year, that each time is kind of like my own little one-night stand," writes Troy at sexlessmarriage.yuku.com. To which Privateer1812 responds sternly: "Don't be drawn into the dysfunction of a sexless marriage. ... I'm in my 8th year of a sexless marriage and if I wasn't 61, I'd be outta here, believe me. The years go by quickly and despite promises, nothing usually changes."

Irked spouses post tales of low libidos, "mean wives" and rejection.

"I can't even shave my own legs without getting pissed. I know I'm wasting my time," nonamenosex writes.

Some members turn to religion for comfort: "Trying" from Texas has started a prayer chain, writing: "I cry out to be touched and loved."

For many on Experience Project, the forum serves as a "replacement for therapy," says Armen Berjikly, the site's San Francisco-based founder.

"This is one of those things that you suffer in silence about and you have no idea that there are so many people in that same scenario. ... It's peer-to-peer support that's incredibly customized."

He adds: "It is a support group and we have found that members may get the push that they need one way or the other" to stick it out or separate.

And although the conversations are highly intimate, to his knowledge, "none of the users have hooked up while in the group," Mr. Berjikly said. Indeed, when members solicit advice on whether they should cheat, the resounding answer appears to be no. And while the yuku.com forum features a section called "Spice" filled with explicit fantasies, a message on the site stresses: "This is not a dating service."

Although the obvious question is why not divorce, the issues that recur throughout the sites reveal the solution is often not so simple. Some couples no longer have sex because one partner is chronically ill. Others are locked in financially, or raising young children together. Many are so terrified of change or being alone that they willingly forgo affection for decades.

Marion Goertz, a registered sex therapist in Toronto, says that although 30 per cent of her female patients complain about low sexual desire and many of her male patients suffer from erectile dysfunction, "couples avoid being sexually intimate for reasons beyond the physical. ...

"If a couple isn't connecting well on many levels, sex becomes the scapegoat," Ms. Goertz said.

"[Sex] is a highly exclusive way of sharing who you are at your most vulnerable and playful with someone you love. If fear, anger and distrust are getting in the way ... the ultimate connectivity of the couple will decline over time."

At York University in Toronto, psychotherapist Catalina Woldarsky Meneses counsels couples who have experienced serious betrayals that have killed the "safety or connection," and the intimacy.

"When things don't get resolved fully, they start to fester. People might get along fine day to day, but when it comes to fully connecting sexually, that's where it plays out," says Ms. Woldarsky Meneses, project co-ordinator for the Emotional Injury Project, which is run through the university's department of psychology.

Site user Diane is hoping she'll be propelled into filing for divorce later this year, when she expects to receive compensation for an injury she suffered in 2007. As for contacts made on the Experience Project site, Diane has befriended a British man whose wife rejects him regularly, and has counselled younger wives experiencing the agony she has been grappling with for more than a decade.

"I am over the anger," she says. "I'm just resigned to the fact that this is the way it is. [My husband]'s who he is. He's not going to change" or discuss it.

"When I look back," she adds, "I can't imagine it's been that many years that I've been like this."
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
So why did they decide to spend the rest of there lives together if it included no sex? Or even a hug... Smart people!?
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,131
44
48
Montréal
Many are so terrified of change or being alone that they willingly forgo affection for decades.

A lot of what is written in the article is sad, but this quote is especially sad IMHO. It (being terrified of change) explains why people remain unhappy with their spouse, or why they put up with their needs not being met (not even close), but it also explains a whole lot of other things people put up with that make them unhappy, or never risk doing what they feel would make them happy and end up full of regrets.

That is so sad. Letting your fear of change rule your life is the death of your soul.
 

Lady Companion

Playful, Classy, Sweet & Sassy!
Supporting Member
Sep 21, 2004
3,528
319
83
41
Vancouver or FMTY
www.ClassyAngel.com
While I agree that a sexless mariage can be sad - I don't think it has to be. A relationship is about a lot of things - and sex is a very small (yet usually integral piece of the pie).

If everything else in the marriage is working - you are best friends, have simliar values, trust one another, have fun together etc....that, in my opinion, is more valuable than just having an active sex life.

In an ideal world, all of that would be available in a realtionship. In reality, most of it usually isn't.

If sex is the only thing missing, and you still have affection, trust, conversation, experiences, values etc. I definatley think it is something many people can overlook. After all, most of us are capable of achieving orgasm on our own - and if not, or if the actual sex is what we crave, that fulfilled via companions or other modalities.


_____________

ClassyAngel - Your fun loving surrey escort and sensual international courtesan. Now available for duos with exclusive Vancouver escorts and sensual and erotic international escorts for the ultimate pampering experience!

604 583 4998
Fun, and amazing memories guaranteed!
http://www.ClassyAngel.com
 

wet_suit_one

Rule by Fear!
May 19, 2004
244
2
0
VERY well said Lady Companion.

I've been married ten years now and while not completely sexless we probably only have sex maybe 4 times a year. We are both in our fifties and although we love each other and there is a lot of compassion-hugging, kissing, etc we just don't feel the compulsion to have sex very often.

It was good when we first met (we were together 3 years before marrying) and for the first few years of marraige but for me after you've had sex with the same person for a number of years it is really hard to keep it exciting.

She is my best friend and I'm more comfortable and at ease with her than anyone else in the world but sex is just SO low on our list of priorities.

Which I guess is why I poon once a month! Keeps me sane.

By the way Lady Companion, great website. Might just have to visit YOU one day!

giddyup
And yet, somehow, you're the one in the wrong because you're cheating on your marriage whereas the fact is that sex with your wife is just not that important to you (if I heard you right). Why can't such an arrangement simply be an acceptable compromise rather than the most vile of betrayals? Why must you not have any more sexual enjoyment just because it kinda got boring with the wife?

I've yet to really understand why this must be so?

Anyways...
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,131
44
48
Montréal
While I agree that a sexless mariage can be sad - I don't think it has to be. A relationship is about a lot of things - and sex is a very small (yet usually integral piece of the pie).

If everything else in the marriage is working - you are best friends, have simliar values, trust one another, have fun together etc....that, in my opinion, is more valuable than just having an active sex life.

In an ideal world, all of that would be available in a realtionship. In reality, most of it usually isn't.

If sex is the only thing missing, and you still have affection, trust, conversation, experiences, values etc. I definatley think it is something many people can overlook. After all, most of us are capable of achieving orgasm on our own - and if not, or if the actual sex is what we crave, that fulfilled via companions or other modalities.

I fully agree however I did not get the impression that the people in the article felt like other aspects of their relationships were strong and could make up for the lack of sex (I mean, having received no affection in years? :eek: )..

But all in all, I would assumed it's fairly unrealistic to expect sex 3x per day after x years together, kids, etc... But if it's so common, why the hell are people not more honest about it? And I often wonder... If one person in a couple no longer wants to have sex, how fair is it to expect from the other, that he/she simply give it up altogether as well. Is seems selfish, unfair and pretty foolish. Do most people just go with a 'don't ask, don't tell' kind of attitude. I don't know, I'm so frustrated with how retarded our society behaves/thinks in regards to sex, it's crazy.



I would like for someone to explain why we continue to have the same attitudes towards sex when there is nothing to justify it: most people aren't religious at all, so why is everyone still buying that sex is bad, that nudity is bad, that genitals are dirty and shameful? Why? Why are we so stupid, huh?

...ok... I won't get too carried away, ignore me. LOL But I have to tell you all, I don't buy it, so I have already decided not to go by all that non sense we just accept... but then I have to deal with all those judgmental people who think they know what's right (them) and who's wrong and dirty (me :D ) but they've actually never come to that conclusion after giving it some thought, they've just been told. And that's good enough for them. And then I have to put up with being looked down on, judged and stigmatized based on their beliefs... the beliefs of mindless sheep.


ok.. I'm starting to sound a little too much like Silky now, aren't I? lol Sorry, I have nowhere else to voice this frustration, besides with all of you, my fellow perverts, dirty minded, naked sex enthusiasts. :p :D


But seriously though (I did have a point :p )... what gets to me, is the complete avoidance and dishonesty about the whole thing. It's so stupid, no?! Anyway, I don't buy into it, no thanks..



oh dear...*sigh* ok.. i'm done now. :eek: :eek:
 

[Server Error]

Clients Abort
Nov 18, 2003
285
1
18
But all in all, I would assumed it's fairly unrealistic to expect sex 3x per day after x years together, kids, etc... But if it's so common, why the hell are people not more honest about it? And I often wonder... If one person in a couple no longer wants to have sex, how fair is it to expect from the other, that he/she simply give it up altogether as well. Is seems selfish, unfair and pretty foolish. Do most people just go with a 'don't ask, don't tell' kind of attitude. I don't know, I'm so frustrated with how retarded our society behaves/thinks in regards to sex, it's crazy.
This is the opposite of keeping a sex slave--keeping a sexual prison. Both arrangements is enemy to freedom. Basically, the societal mores imply that if you are married and your spouse decides to stop having sex with you, you are pretty much SOL with no other sexual outlets if you want to be a 'good standing' member of the society and don't want to risk the consequence of a divorce. But the participants should have known this is a real possibility before exchanging vows. If they (which is definitely not in the minority) hadn't known and decided to do something, they must bear the full financial/emotional impact to end the cycle. This is price for the lesson they needed to learn. No one else could help them if they are afraid to change or face the issues; if they don't gain the necessary experience, they will just repeat the same thing all over again.

I would like for someone to explain why we continue to have the same attitudes towards sex when there is nothing to justify it: most people aren't religious at all, so why is everyone still buying that sex is bad, that nudity is bad, that genitals are dirty and shameful? Why? Why are we so stupid, huh?
This is a complex question. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I think the dominant religion in Canada is still Christianity. The country is still pretty much run on its principles. Now, look at U.S. and pretty much anywhere in the world, I will say religions do have their strong hold on the majority of the world's population and countries (and their politics, economy, education, ... everything). And doesn't Vatican have the world's largest gold vault?

Let's say I awed the ancient folks by appearing to be omnipotent, and forced them to create a religion to worship me--you'd better give your power to me because I am awsome. I considered the populace to be my property. All of their ova and sperms shall be strictly used to create workers; none shall be wasted. Oh, I shall also brainwash them into believing that sex is bad so that it is done only for procreation because sexual energy is potent and actually assists spiritual growth. True spirituality breaks the chains of religions and society. This is bad news because I (and my appointed lackeys) can no longer control them to maintain the status quo. What a dilemma--I need workers who must have sex, which could potentially liberate them, to reproduce. So what to do? Easy! Just mix something into heterosexuality that has the added benefit of stunting spirituality to some degree. Also, before my workers figure out that like attracts like and homosexuality promotes even greater spiritual growth and freedom (but it doesn't create my workers!), I totally forbid it and make it punishable by death!

This is the public story I will give. If you really feel a need to and want to know why and are not afraid of the answers, PM me.

...ok... I won't get too carried away, ignore me. LOL But I have to tell you all, I don't buy it, so I have already decided not to go by all that non sense we just accept... but then I have to deal with all those judgmental people who think they know what's right (them) and who's wrong and dirty (me :D ) but they've actually never come to that conclusion after giving it some thought, they've just been told. And that's good enough for them. And then I have to put up with being looked down on, judged and stigmatized based on their beliefs... the beliefs of mindless sheep.
Mindlessness is an apt description. 'People' say, 'they' say, 'everyone' says, 'the government' says, 'god' tells me... I'll just do whatever others tell me because then I don't have to think and I will conform to the society's idea of a model citizen who is to work hard and maintain the status quo. I'll give my power away to whomever is willing to take it as long as I have food, water, shelter, and, wow, am grateful for a few weeks of vacation per year when I am not making riches richer. I am so busy the rest of the year 'contributing to the society' that I don't have time to care about or too tired to notice what is really happening arsound me. Many issues in the society are non-issues (all the debates are red herring and create distraction), and many solvable problems aren't solved (that would break the statu quo). But then again, I can't notice it or do anything about it because I am always exhausted--from the work I do to feed me, the nearly nutrition-less food I eat, the contaminated water and air I drink and breathe, the drugs that weaken the body, and the EM radiation that's all over the place.

ok.. I'm starting to sound a little too much like Silky now, aren't I? lol Sorry, I have nowhere else to voice this frustration, besides with all of you, my fellow perverts, dirty minded, naked sex enthusiasts. :p :D But seriously though (I did have a point :p )... what gets to me, is the complete avoidance and dishonesty about the whole thing. It's so stupid, no?! Anyway, I don't buy into it, no thanks..

oh dear...*sigh* ok.. i'm done now. :eek: :eek:
Good for ya. I wish there were more people like you who is able to think for themselves and makes their own decision. But everyone views and evaluates the world differently, so what may be apparent to one will be difficult to get through another. It's frustrating because some of them, thinking they are right, can't stop bothering me, but that's way it is. (When I think I am right, I offer my view but I don't force it onto anyone. What works for me may not be for you)

If you can find others with a similar outlook to share experiences with, consider yourself extremely fortunate.
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,131
44
48
Montréal
If you can find others with a similar outlook to share experiences with, consider yourself extremely fortunate.


Well after a reply like this one [Server Error], I am counting my lucky stars. That gave me a warm fuzzy feeling. lol :)


Can I make a list (more like a chapter maybe?) of other issues about the world that torment me, for you to address at your own leisure? :D


And........ Is it very wrong that I'm slightly turned on by your post? Nevermind, forget I said anything.... :p lol
 

FunSugarDaddy

New member
Aug 15, 2008
1,110
5
0
While I agree that a sexless mariage can be sad - I don't think it has to be. A relationship is about a lot of things - and sex is a very small (yet usually integral piece of the pie).

If everything else in the marriage is working - you are best friends, have simliar values, trust one another, have fun together etc....that, in my opinion, is more valuable than just having an active sex life.

In an ideal world, all of that would be available in a realtionship. In reality, most of it usually isn't.

If sex is the only thing missing, and you still have affection, trust, conversation, experiences, values etc. I definatley think it is something many people can overlook. After all, most of us are capable of achieving orgasm on our own - and if not, or if the actual sex is what we crave, that fulfilled via companions or other modalities.


_____________

ClassyAngel - Your fun loving surrey escort and sensual international courtesan. Now available for duos with exclusive Vancouver escorts and sensual and erotic international escorts for the ultimate pampering experience!

604 583 4998
Fun, and amazing memories guaranteed!
http://www.ClassyAngel.com
Yet another well thought out insightful post.
 

wess

New member
Jan 5, 2009
613
2
0
This is the opposite of keeping a sex slave--keeping a sexual prison. Both arrangements is enemy to freedom. Basically, the societal mores imply that if you are married and your spouse decides to stop having sex with you, you are pretty much SOL with no other sexual outlets if you want to be a 'good standing' member of the society and don't want to risk the consequence of a divorce. But the participants should have known this is a real possibility before exchanging vows. If they (which is definitely not in the minority) hadn't known and decided to do something, they must bear the full financial/emotional impact to end the cycle. This is price for the lesson they needed to learn. No one else could help them if they are afraid to change or face the issues; if they don't gain the necessary experience, they will just repeat the same thing all over again.

This is a complex question. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I think the dominant religion in Canada is still Christianity. The country is still pretty much run on its principles. Now, look at U.S. and pretty much anywhere in the world, I will say religions do have their strong hold on the majority of the world's population and countries (and their politics, economy, education, ... everything). And doesn't Vatican have the world's largest gold vault?

Let's say I awed the ancient folks by appearing to be omnipotent, and forced them to create a religion to worship me--you'd better give your power to me because I am awsome. I considered the populace to be my property. All of their ova and sperms shall be strictly used to create workers; none shall be wasted. Oh, I shall also brainwash them into believing that sex is bad so that it is done only for procreation because sexual energy is potent and actually assists spiritual growth. True spirituality breaks the chains of religions and society. This is bad news because I (and my appointed lackeys) can no longer control them to maintain the status quo. What a dilemma--I need workers who must have sex, which could potentially liberate them, to reproduce. So what to do? Easy! Just mix something into heterosexuality that has the added benefit of stunting spirituality to some degree. Also, before my workers figure out that like attracts like and homosexuality promotes even greater spiritual growth and freedom (but it doesn't create my workers!), I totally forbid it and make it punishable by death!

This is the public story I will give. If you really feel a need to and want to know why and are not afraid of the answers, PM me.

Mindlessness is an apt description. 'People' say, 'they' say, 'everyone' says, 'the government' says, 'god' tells me... I'll just do whatever others tell me because then I don't have to think and I will conform to the society's idea of a model citizen who is to work hard and maintain the status quo. I'll give my power away to whomever is willing to take it as long as I have food, water, shelter, and, wow, am grateful for a few weeks of vacation per year when I am not making riches richer. I am so busy the rest of the year 'contributing to the society' that I don't have time to care about or too tired to notice what is really happening arsound me. Many issues in the society are non-issues (all the debates are red herring and create distraction), and many solvable problems aren't solved (that would break the statu quo). But then again, I can't notice it or do anything about it because I am always exhausted--from the work I do to feed me, the nearly nutrition-less food I eat, the contaminated water and air I drink and breathe, the drugs that weaken the body, and the EM radiation that's all over the place.

Good for ya. I wish there were more people like you who is able to think for themselves and makes their own decision. But everyone views and evaluates the world differently, so what may be apparent to one will be difficult to get through another. It's frustrating because some of them, thinking they are right, can't stop bothering me, but that's way it is. (When I think I am right, I offer my view but I don't force it onto anyone. What works for me may not be for you)

If you can find others with a similar outlook to share experiences with, consider yourself extremely fortunate.
With religion and society, everyone is the same when nobody is looking.

Priests dont look at porn ? yeah right.

Mennonites dont drink ? haha
 

[Server Error]

Clients Abort
Nov 18, 2003
285
1
18
Well after a reply like this one [Server Error], I am counting my lucky stars. That gave me a warm fuzzy feeling. lol :)

Can I make a list (more like a chapter maybe?) of other issues about the world that torment me, for you to address at your own leisure? :D

And........ Is it very wrong that I'm slightly turned on by your post? Nevermind, forget I said anything.... :p lol
Few people get turned on by it, so that makes you weir... special like me :D Remember, there is really no right or wrong; it's all in our perspective. And send your Qs over. I can't promise anything, but I'll give you special perb advertiser discount! hehe.

With religion and society, everyone is the same when nobody is looking.

Priests dont look at porn ? yeah right.
Mennonites dont drink ? haha
Really? Aren't I supposed to believe them when they say they are doing god's work? Or is it because they are (self-)appointed by their god, they think they can do pretty much anything unbridled?
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts