Seoul got " BUSTED"
- Thread starter VERSUS
- Start date
oppai said:
Your right oppai,this whole thread sould be in the Lounge,I will get on it right away.
VERSUS,please place your non-review in the Correct Forum.Thank you.
How is that oppai? Anal enough?
How is that oppai? Anal enough?
Versus, it may be hard to tell if they are open by just driving by. Wasn't their big neon sign flashing saying "Open - now serving #1012" flashing in the window.
Re: Finally!
And for the others who frequently visit Seoul, does Pinky welcome bananas?
It seems to me that anyone caught in a MP "in the act with the girl - literally" would then be in a premises which would fall under "the legal definition of a "common bawdy house" ".Maury Beniowski said:
Presume you wouldn't be so cantankerous if your friend had been caught in Seoul instead of a licensed MP.Maury Beniowski said:
And for the others who frequently visit Seoul, does Pinky welcome bananas?
Re: Re: Finally!
LE usually goes in with three objectives:
1. City Bylaw Enforcement,
2. Immigration Violations and
3. Oustanding Warrants. (and maybe to check out the girls)
Any pooner could have fallen in lust, I mean love, with the attendant and decided he couldn't wait to get home. Taking your logic further, anybody's living room but your own could then be considered a bawdy house.
Trust me, I'm Mr. Lawyer...
Yes, but how do you prove it? And how much are you willing to spend to prosecute this? There's a cost vs. benefit factor that just wouldn't hold much water.Johnsam said:
LE usually goes in with three objectives:
1. City Bylaw Enforcement,
2. Immigration Violations and
3. Oustanding Warrants. (and maybe to check out the girls
)Any pooner could have fallen in lust, I mean love, with the attendant and decided he couldn't wait to get home. Taking your logic further, anybody's living room but your own could then be considered a bawdy house.
Trust me, I'm Mr. Lawyer...
Is that a yes but no?
Actually, any premise could be a bawdy house - it really depends what goes on in there. Lust/love, cost/benefit, yes/no .... doesn't change a thing.Maury Beniowski said:Yes?
Yes, but how do you prove it? And how much are you willing to spend to prosecute this? There's a cost vs. benefit factor that just wouldn't hold much water.
LE usually goes in with three objectives:
1. City Bylaw Enforcement,
2. Immigration Violations and
3. Oustanding Warrants. (and maybe to check out the girls
No?
Any pooner could have fallen in lust, I mean love, with the attendant and decided he couldn't wait to get home. Taking your logic further, anybody's living room but your own could then be considered a bawdy house.
Trust me, I'm Mr. Lawyer...
Re: Re: Finally!
As for your post above, I agree. However, my statement regarding cost vs. benefit is made from the Crown's p.o.v.
Bananas, yes; eggs, maybe!Johnsam said:
As for your post above, I agree. However, my statement regarding cost vs. benefit is made from the Crown's p.o.v.
B4 if they are open....they have the front door light turn on......so u can tell they are opendeke said:Versus, it may be hard to tell if they are open by just driving by. Wasn't their big neon sign flashing saying "Open - now serving #1012" flashing in the window.
THEY WERE BUSTED!
Seven Korean women ordered out of Canada
The Koreans were working in residential massage parlour
Nicholas Read, with a file from Doug Alexander
Vancouver Sun
August 10, 2004
CREDIT: Stuart Davis, Vancouver Sun
Jung Park, a Korean national, is brought to an immigration hearing in Vancouver. Seven Korean women were ordered to leave Canada as soon as possible and not to return for at least a year.
Seven Korean woman were ordered home Monday following a raid by Vancouver police of what immigration officers described in documents as a "residential massage parlour with heavy traffic."
The women were arrested Aug. 5 after members of the police vice unit and immigration officers went to a house in the 1400 block of West 53rd Avenue in Vancouver.
The women were subsequently taken to the immigration department's B.C. Holding Centre at Vancouver International Airport, where they were held until a series of immigration hearings Monday ordered their removal from Canada.
They were all released pending the posting of security bonds, and told to leave Canada as soon as possible and not return for at least one year.
The women are identified as Jung Park, Hwa Yong Choi, Yun Hya Kim, Gi Young Nam, Ji Hee Nam, Min Kyong Kim and Su Wong Cho.
Police refused to comment on the case, saying it was still under investigation, but documents obtained from Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIS) say the house in question had been identified by the vice unit as "a residential massage parlour with heavy traffic."
Among the crimes the vice unit investigates are those involving sexual exploitation, including prostitution and the running of bawdy houses.
According to a written statement by CIS agent Ward Hindson, when he and police went to the address last Thursday, "two Asian males and seven Asian females attempted to flee from the residence through the various exits. Six females climbed out of a basement window and attempted to hide in the bushes. One of the females . . . was discovered under a vehicle in the garage of the residence."
On Monday, the women, all in their early 20s and all Korean nationals, were led one by one in handcuffs to a series of hearings by the Immigration and Refugee Board to determine their future.
The women's lawyer, Robert Champoux, said none of the women contested the findings of immigration officers and agreed to leave the country on order by the board.
All the women were charged under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act with working without authorization in Canada. The women were said to have been employed at a "massage parlour" where they received $100 in cash for each 45-minute "full-body massage" given.
Two of the women were sisters and one of them was married with a young child in Korea.
The men arrested with them, identified in CIS documents only as "Mr. Chen and Mr. Ong," were both Canadian citizens.
The hearing was told that the women, some of whom were said to be university educated, arrived in Canada as sightseers, but saw an advertisement in a local Korean newspaper looking for women to perform massages at a private house. Canada does not require Korean visitors to carry visas, only return tickets.
Hindson's statement said Chen worked at the residence as a doorman, and that the residence had been open for business since March. Chen told Hindson that customers paid him $180 for each massage.
He said he did not know who hired the women.
The house in which the business was operated -- a well-kept, one-level rancher at 53rd and Granville that had two security cameras monitoring the main doors -- is owned by Frankie and Angela Man of Vancouver.
Seven Korean women ordered out of Canada
The Koreans were working in residential massage parlour
Nicholas Read, with a file from Doug Alexander
Vancouver Sun
August 10, 2004
CREDIT: Stuart Davis, Vancouver Sun
Jung Park, a Korean national, is brought to an immigration hearing in Vancouver. Seven Korean women were ordered to leave Canada as soon as possible and not to return for at least a year.
Seven Korean woman were ordered home Monday following a raid by Vancouver police of what immigration officers described in documents as a "residential massage parlour with heavy traffic."
The women were arrested Aug. 5 after members of the police vice unit and immigration officers went to a house in the 1400 block of West 53rd Avenue in Vancouver.
The women were subsequently taken to the immigration department's B.C. Holding Centre at Vancouver International Airport, where they were held until a series of immigration hearings Monday ordered their removal from Canada.
They were all released pending the posting of security bonds, and told to leave Canada as soon as possible and not return for at least one year.
The women are identified as Jung Park, Hwa Yong Choi, Yun Hya Kim, Gi Young Nam, Ji Hee Nam, Min Kyong Kim and Su Wong Cho.
Police refused to comment on the case, saying it was still under investigation, but documents obtained from Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIS) say the house in question had been identified by the vice unit as "a residential massage parlour with heavy traffic."
Among the crimes the vice unit investigates are those involving sexual exploitation, including prostitution and the running of bawdy houses.
According to a written statement by CIS agent Ward Hindson, when he and police went to the address last Thursday, "two Asian males and seven Asian females attempted to flee from the residence through the various exits. Six females climbed out of a basement window and attempted to hide in the bushes. One of the females . . . was discovered under a vehicle in the garage of the residence."
On Monday, the women, all in their early 20s and all Korean nationals, were led one by one in handcuffs to a series of hearings by the Immigration and Refugee Board to determine their future.
The women's lawyer, Robert Champoux, said none of the women contested the findings of immigration officers and agreed to leave the country on order by the board.
All the women were charged under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act with working without authorization in Canada. The women were said to have been employed at a "massage parlour" where they received $100 in cash for each 45-minute "full-body massage" given.
Two of the women were sisters and one of them was married with a young child in Korea.
The men arrested with them, identified in CIS documents only as "Mr. Chen and Mr. Ong," were both Canadian citizens.
The hearing was told that the women, some of whom were said to be university educated, arrived in Canada as sightseers, but saw an advertisement in a local Korean newspaper looking for women to perform massages at a private house. Canada does not require Korean visitors to carry visas, only return tickets.
Hindson's statement said Chen worked at the residence as a doorman, and that the residence had been open for business since March. Chen told Hindson that customers paid him $180 for each massage.
He said he did not know who hired the women.
The house in which the business was operated -- a well-kept, one-level rancher at 53rd and Granville that had two security cameras monitoring the main doors -- is owned by Frankie and Angela Man of Vancouver.
