Carman Fox

seems like some racism is ok

normisanas

Banned
Nov 23, 2009
603
1
0
Normisanas - I know you’re reading this, although this is a reply to Miss*Bijou, most of what I have to say also refers to your good self Sir.
hey look, I argue with you and grusse and anyone else on this topic because my intention is that when I think that someone comes across with an entire point of view that is very different from mine, then I submit what I think for the purpose of finding some truth that we can discover together. Now often that doesn't produce good results, but I think it's always worth a try. This time, however, no results were produced because I believe you took nothing I said seriously - and not because you are an arrogant person (I'm not speaking for grusse here, his challenges seem monumental), but because of the very thing I am speaking of that makes it very difficult to close the gap on this issue.

I was once a person who held very similar opinions to you so I have had the benefit of being on the other side of it. When younger, I grew up at a time and place in Canada when there was nobody of colour in my own town save 2 other people, and all my friends were white. I felt like a banana, that is, I was a white person inside but just "happened", as I thought, to be born of yellow skin. Now of course my dear childhood friends and their families accepted me, they did not see "colour". But as I grew older, sometime in my late teens, I saw "colour". I was forced to become aware of my own "colour", by virtue of the fact that I began to realize that there was something inherently different between myself and the white world around me. Fast forward to 2013, decades later: I see the exact same challenges I saw then - even as society here has changed with the influx of immigrants that has changed the composition of peoples in certain places, the attitudes of the white majority are still the same - they did not see colour, they were and still are not aware for the most part of the challenges and discrimination of growing up coloured in a white world means. And when I say "world", I of course don't mean the physical earth: I mean history, I mean power, I mean institutions, I mean way of life. I mean walking into a mall and seeing that all the mannequins are white. I mean Jesus is depicted as a white man when he should look more like Osama Bin Laden. I mean the cosmetic surgeons are giving Asian girls caucasian noses. I mean the Asian girls that are held up as the most beautiful are the ones that look most caucasian - and this from both Asians and Caucasians alike. I mean that the top 10% wealthiest and powerful individuals are white. I mean the presidents of hispanic countries are mostly white and until recently were always white. I mean if you picked up a Playboy you would have 90% white girls. And all this would not actually bother me because I grew up white - except for the fact that I know everything about being white, and have to demonstrate my whiteness at jobs, in social settings, in meeting new people, in conversing with business people, in just about every avenue of life except those strictly defined as "coloured", but white people don't have to demonstrate anything because it is on their standards, and should you as a coloured person fail to demonstrate white behaviour, you will likely be called out on it in one form or another.

Assuming you are not a disabled person, you probably wouldn't think twice about how you got to work on any given day. But if you were disabled, you'd think not just about how you got to work, but how you got up the stairs, how getting to work has been arranged, how you are perceived when you go into a meeting, what people might think of you if you had to manage clients, why you might be called to attend some socials and not others, etc. The disabled person lives in a world created in the image of the non-disabled person. He is faced every day with the discrimination and second guessing. In order for him to function, he must demonstrate as though he was a completely abled person, but the abled person never thought twice about his world. That's a very similar challenge.

While you may see many successful immigrants who have loads of money, I can tell you that IF they made their money in Canada or the United States, they probably worked much harder and with more obstacles to achieve the same level of success as a white person. My immigrant parents came to Canada with what they saved to get plane fare in the 70's, which took them 2 years of saving nothing but for to achieve. They had nothing else. Their success was built on sheer will power and 14 hour days 7 days a week in a grocery store, something the average white Canadian would never do. This is a pretty typical common story for Asian migrants, my parents were not exceptional. The result was owning a home and retiring without a mortgage, and going from poverty to middle class. The moral of the story: the immigrant (unless they started wealthy, and most are not) starts with less assets and less access to institutions and resources than their white counterpart. To achieve the same level of success, they have greater challenges they must face every day and less to do it with.

So to hear a person who belongs to the majority complain about how hard a life they've had it, is to me like listening to a spoiled child. Yes, life is hard and it sucks to be told you're worthless because of your skin colour, and just as bad if you are white as it is if you are black. That's a given. Then to hear those in the majority complain that the coloured person is taking away their opportunities as though it was stolen from them, that's called acting privileged because the playing field is not level, the playing field is and always has been slanted far in favour of those in the majority.

Now I have also had the benefit of visiting other parts of the world where white is not the majority. The situations are quite similar but not exact, but for purposes of this conversation and not to widen the discussion any further, I will say they are the same. A white person trying to live and work in say, China, would have similar challenges.
 

The Lizard King

New member
Jul 8, 2003
1,272
0
0
The minute someone or some site hints that "hate" is an emotion or opinion exclusive to white people or that racism and discrimination does not occur against white people, those individuals, websites, and publications lose any shred of credibility in my opinion. Didn't bother to read everything, and there's no denying what has historically happened or continues to happen to blacks and Hispanics etc but it's clear the agenda of some of this is to actually put the reader in the mindset that no matter what a white person says, they're either a blatant racist or one subconsciously. In other words, whites can say or do no right and exclusively hate every non-white.

The Unapologetic Mexican site alone is filled with HATE towards whites and you just need to read the entire "glosario" page linked to see that.
http://www.theunapologeticmexican.org/glosario.html

†The Post-Racial: A folksy spell, almost always invoked with good cheer. But don't be fooled! While The Post Racial is one of the softest of the Wite-Magik Attax, this assault is no less corrosive and detrimental to the cause and practice of honest dialogue—and thus eventual justice for all peoples—than more angsty and direct attax like The Oversensitive.

While the Scarem-Carom is bounced outward with an ominous tone, the Seeing Eye Frog with a bloated self-assuredness and the Existential Blackmail as a whine on the lips of a pup, The Post Racial is pronounced with a smile and the euphoric assertion that the speaker exists in a place where they are enlightened and thus admit existing social/racial iniquities (such as what % of CEOs are black, or how many people of color are in prison or arrested regularly, how many cops who fire their guns are white, vs what is the overwhelming percentage of the ethnicities of the people shot by those cops and so on ad infinitum) but that these realities no longer require action (and especially not more than a whiff of conversation) because, of course, Barack Obama!
 

Bartdude

New member
Jul 5, 2006
1,252
5
0
Calgary
Is that really intended as some kind of 'proof'? There are so many things wrong with that claim I don't even know where to begin.. The numbers of various racial backgrounds is absolutely irrelevant. I can name several countries where the white minority has all the power and the indigenous majority has none and suffers all the oppression, discrimination and racism. That's what we call colonialism.

Policies usually exist within countries. That's where they are created and that's where they are enforced. And it's clear that numbers are meaningless. So the only thing your link tells me is that there are more non Caucasians than Caucasians in the world. Whoopdeedoo. We're talking about power, money - both current and historical. Why don't you go look for wealth distribution and history of colonialism and tell me what you find.

Look for the genocide of indigenous populations in Mexico, the US and Canada by white European settlers. France's history in Algeria, Apartheid in South Africa - all were white minorities against black or brown majority. Africa has several examples. and there are tons of other examples (India!) and if you want one that is current - because most of them are thankfully part of history although their legacy isn't - just look at Palestinians' ongoing ethnic cleansing and colonization by white European Jewish settlers... all supported by other white European dominated countries such as the US, Canada, Australia and we'll, actual white European countries like England, France etc.

You guys are really going to have to work a little harder and come up with a lot more than what you have so far, which is basically nothing.

I think you’re projecting here. It sounds to me like it’s yourself you’re talking about. You’ve made it very clear you’ve already made up mind and don’t even care about what anyone else has to say and have no desire to even understand what others are talking about. You can’t even come up with a half decent relevant argument for god’s sake.. Yet you think you’re somehow in a position to insult other people and ridicule them for not understanding your claims? Newsflash: We understand them all right, people are simply trying to move the discussion beyond the level you apparently think as very intellectual. Please.

Facts and logic? From you? LOL Shit, what a joke. Get real. You’ve got a seriously overblown and exaggerated opinion of yourself. I suggest you re-think your performance on this thread because it’s definitely not deserving of the praise you think it is in the fantasy world you live in.

Alex posted a video and link to Tim Wise. I've posted several videos from him on a previous thread on racism. But just like in that thread, people can't be bothered to even watch it, let alone to address it. They and you prefer to just keep repeating the same things over again. That's not called facts. You seem to understand fact over opinion but you don't seem to be clear on what facts and opinions are because you appear to think what you're saying qualifies as fact and not as mere opinion. I would suggest doing a bit of research on that. Your arguments might be a little more convincing if you did.

You'd have to engage and actually respond to the responses you get though, so I understand how your current understanding might be preferred by you. It must be pleasant not to have to consider anyone's arguments and simply dismiss them without even needing to consider them. But guess what? While you obviously have many opinions about this topic, some people (like Tim Wise) actually have careers dedicated to the subject. I know you've decided you're a genius and expert on racism and all but you might want to listen to what people who don't just like to think of themselves as Knowledgeable experts, they actually are and that's how people also describe them and why what they say is credible and based on facts. Unless I missed it somehow, no one considers you an expert of great credibility. So while humility is quite obviously not something that comes naturally to you, I'd highly suggest you practice that too. I

Newsflash : it's intellectually dishonest and lazy. Get over yourself for just 5 minutes if you can manage and give your detractors the minimum of respect they deserve, stop being lazy and consider their arguments and offer thoughtful, relevant replies. If you're not willing to do even this, then you have no place posting and pretending to welcome discussion and really need to stfu and stop wasting everyone else's time, it's fucking rude.
 

grusse

Well-known member
Feb 18, 2010
3,768
2,011
113
Safe trip grusse!

;)
thanks Sarah

after work was completed, had 3 days with nature.....no laptop,phone,tv,radio,...nada.

nice to get away, did some hunting(with a camera, not a gun)

not trying to revive this thread, rather to put it to bed.

never thought my observation would generate 8 pages,over 100 replies,many very thoughtful

yes, there was the inevitable venom-spewing from predictable sources, but that is also good,as every thread
dexerves some comic relief.
I find her more amusing than annoying.
Actually, I feel sorry for her, can't be fun to carry around that much hate and insecurity.

So, thanks all for your feedback!
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,136
44
48
Montréal
OMFG Sarah!

How dare you post an image where one Colour is in the forefront and the others relegated to varying levels of the back-row-ness.
The utter contempt you must feel for all of the Colours that are not considered to be “Normal” as they are all positioned behind the one in front.

I simply can’t believe your level of callousness.
What happened to you?
How did society fail you so horribly?

And of course you realize that by setting the Colour (that I shall not name in public) on the front row (implying it’s the “Normal” Colour”) you’ve invited all of the other Colours to attack its “Colour Privilege” shown in its pride of placement.

Oh the Humanity!


Really?

wow. You have some issues, Buddy. LOL
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,136
44
48
Montréal
The minute someone or some site hints that "hate" is an emotion or opinion exclusive to white people or that racism and discrimination does not occur against white people, those individuals, websites, and publications lose any shred of credibility in my opinion. Didn't bother to read everything, and there's no denying what has historically happened or continues to happen to blacks and Hispanics etc but it's clear the agenda of some of this is to actually put the reader in the mindset that no matter what a white person says, they're either a blatant racist or one subconsciously. In other words, whites can say or do no right and exclusively hate every non-white.

The Unapologetic Mexican site alone is filled with HATE towards whites and you just need to read the entire "glosario" page linked to see that.
http://www.theunapologeticmexican.org/glosario.html

Where did I say discrimination can't happen to white people?

I said white people do not experience racism. They can experience prejudice or discrimination. Because, as I said, these 3 words are related although not interchangeable. Feel free to actually read why I posted in (I believe) my first reply where I included the definitions of all 3. I also included an explanation of why white people do not experience racism but it's very possible for them/us to experience prejudice in my reply to Cami's example.

Sheesh. How many times can I repeat it before you guys bother reading it.


Aside from that, 'The Unapologetic Mexican' is bi-racial...white being the other one. I'm sure you're right though, he must be biased against and feel hate for whites. Hm. (And it also only represents one out of several sources.)





not trying to revive this thread, rather to put it to bed.

lol
Yah because of course we all know the way to put a thread to bed is to post on it 5 days after everyone else stopped :thumb:
 

grusse

Well-known member
Feb 18, 2010
3,768
2,011
113
read my thread again, miss bj, slowly.

I was away 5-6 days,no internet access.

I would remind you that you posted twice after I said I wanted to put this to rest, so it is you who seem intent on reviving this thread.

I'd suggest that is a case of the pot calling the kettle black but you would no doubt attack that as a racial slur and assail the thread
with multiple cut&paste articles nobody cares about.

thx again for the humour, you never disappoint.
 

grusse

Well-known member
Feb 18, 2010
3,768
2,011
113
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/van/ths/4078654620.html

Summer is waiting for you to come.
l am pretty and hot and sweet. l will give you a special tonight....
call me 778-8588562(out and in)
pls no black calls (emphasis mine)
now you've done it,mik...take cover....incoming.

there are flamers who will not agree with "don't shoot the messenger."

on a more serious note...I'd've thought an ad with that wording wouldn't be allowed?
 

normisanas

Banned
Nov 23, 2009
603
1
0
now you've done it,mik...take cover....incoming.

there are flamers who will not agree with "don't shoot the messenger."

on a more serious note...I'd've thought an ad with that wording wouldn't be allowed?
she meant "blocked" calls, sheesh.
 

bcneil

I am from BC
Aug 24, 2007
2,095
0
36
yes, that does make more sense.

still, doesn't someone edit the ads?
Are you kidding? Most SP ads look like they were contracted out to oldmaxx
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts