sandra fluke

[myselftheother]

I can't imagine even one instance of where a union would be better. Whenever you can't terminate or discipline poor performers it will hurt the organization. Promoting someone based on their start date rather than their ability and initiative breeds poor performance.

Nothing is worse however when you combine the inherent incompetency of a government agency with a union.

You guys are getting waaay off topic. What the fuck has unions and bad employees have to do with the topic of this thread? Nothing. This has to do with breaking the cycle of generational poverty by making available contraception to disadvantaged females, so instead of getting knocked up by some loser in the neighborhood because they couldn't afford precautions, or weren't educated enough in pregnancy prevention, so they can continue to go to school, find work, and break the cycle. Also, giving out free condoms as well would lower the rate of STI's.

What do unions and bad employees have to do with that?

 

[Devo]

You guys are getting waaay off topic. What the fuck has unions and bad employees have to do with the topic of this thread? Nothing. This has to do with breaking the cycle of generational poverty by making available contraception to disadvantaged females, so instead of getting knocked up by some loser in the neighborhood because they couldn't afford precautions, or weren't educated enough in pregnancy prevention, so they can continue to go to school, find work, and break the cycle. Also, giving out free condoms as well would lower the rate of STI's.

What do unions and bad employees have to do with that?

Notice how he singles out me the Conservative for getting off topic. Go back and read this thread. It wasn't me who started talking about Indians and Unions.

 

[Horse99]

Is this the correct math in question? $3000 over two years? or $4.11 a day? Just as it's easy enough to think that's such a minor amount for the government to pay, she could just as easily cut back one latte a day at Starbux, and pay for it herself. Oh wait, there's an idea, I think the government should start paying for my coffees in the morning.....I am entitled, and I am a better person for it, because it will help some poor farmer in Colombia.

 

[bcneil]

Is this the correct math in question? $3000 over two years? or $4.11 a day? Just as it's easy enough to think that's such a minor amount for the government to pay, she could just as easily cut back one latte a day at Starbux, and pay for it herself. Oh wait, there's an idea, I think the government should start paying for my coffees in the morning.....I am entitled, and I am a better person for it, because it will help some poor farmer in Colombia.

How does paying for your coffee save money? Providing for birth control means they dont have to pay hundreds of thousands to deliver and then raise the baby of a poor mother. You seriously don't understand the concept....really?

I have also noticed many of you have a complete disconnect from reality. Not even considering all the money saved by not having to support a child through the system. But just the cost alone of giving any woman who can't afford the pill free of charge.......amounts to what?
How much do you think it would cost you personally in taxes?? Of course in reality it would save us all money. Any actuary can tell you this :clap2:

Its like the religious guy arguing against abortion, but decides to take the "Not with my taxes" argument instead of his religious one.
Yet out of his $10000 a year income taxes, 30 cents went to fund abortion.

 

[Devo]

Is a person a Conservative if they have never worked as a Campaign Manager for a Conservative candidate? When you succeed in becoming government, you have to worry about Indians and Unions. That's part of being government.

Can you send me your secret decoder ring to go with the above post because I have absolutely no clue what your point is.