D downunder Member Aug 22, 2010 52 14 8 Feb 5, 2020 #1 anyone got into on this one stated age 43 , located in coquitlam area
S sunnydayz Active member May 17, 2014 212 235 43 Feb 5, 2020 #2 Believe this is the same Samantha that has been reviewed under 5798. kinky but average looks and let's just say her previous claim of being tight was not accurate at all.
Believe this is the same Samantha that has been reviewed under 5798. kinky but average looks and let's just say her previous claim of being tight was not accurate at all.
D downunder Member Aug 22, 2010 52 14 8 Feb 5, 2020 #3 Thanks , had a feeling it might be that gal at 5798 but wasnt sure . Was she in her 40s
