Who'd you want on your team?
It's a tough one, like another Gretzky vs Lemieux.
Brodeur, physically-wise, is better bang for your buck, still playing, and less volatile. But I feel he's had the benefit of playing for a defence-first fanatical system, as opposed to Montreal's conservativism in Roy's days.
Doesn't hurt when you've got Stevens, Niedermayer, Rafalski, Daneyko, White...Roy had Robinson near the end of his career...there's Chelios, but not for long, Ludwig, Desjardins, Schneider...hmmm, still think the Devils had the superior better D.
So I'll pick Roy, he literally won more games on his own, remember those Boston series, against LA '93, Rangers 86, & Colorado's first Cup...more passionate, more competitive, & challenged his players.
Just don't invite him to your house unless you've got an extra door ready to be installed
It's a tough one, like another Gretzky vs Lemieux.
Brodeur, physically-wise, is better bang for your buck, still playing, and less volatile. But I feel he's had the benefit of playing for a defence-first fanatical system, as opposed to Montreal's conservativism in Roy's days.
Doesn't hurt when you've got Stevens, Niedermayer, Rafalski, Daneyko, White...Roy had Robinson near the end of his career...there's Chelios, but not for long, Ludwig, Desjardins, Schneider...hmmm, still think the Devils had the superior better D.
So I'll pick Roy, he literally won more games on his own, remember those Boston series, against LA '93, Rangers 86, & Colorado's first Cup...more passionate, more competitive, & challenged his players.
Just don't invite him to your house unless you've got an extra door ready to be installed