The Porn Dude

Roberto a Canuck for Life

belmontkingsize

Active member
Aug 9, 2009
289
91
28
40
...the more this Luongo contract feeds off the blindness hysteria by the bandwagon fans in this city, why even bother paying a goalie that kind of $$$?

What Stanley Cup champion in recent memory where a goalie was the difference?

So the bandwagons say it's only $5.33 mil cap hit...well, if the Nucks quit friggin' overpaying stay-at-home Dmen like Mitchell $3.5mil/yr, you've got plenty of room to add TWO Top 6 forwards in this pathetic offense of ours...at least one sane fan out there who called in today reminded of some bad signings

Canuckleheads, need I remind you that we were ranked 25th in power play ranking, whatever it was, we're in the bottom third.

Let's scrap those Stanley Cup parades, shall we? ;)
I totally agree with you. As it is right now we're overpaying and signing ridiculously long contracts with our goalie and d.men while not focusing on what the team really needs. And even for those Luongo fans out there, come on think about it, 12 years? Its just too excessive.
 

JustJess

New member
Jan 9, 2009
62
1
0
Vancouver
i believe you proved my point

Just a quick question??

Bandwagons in this town?? Please explain...
 

belmontkingsize

Active member
Aug 9, 2009
289
91
28
40
I actually agree with you on this 100% and I also don't understand them giving Steve Bernier 2 Million. That boggles my mind.
What boggles my mind more is what they pay some MLB players. Never really understood whats so fun about baseball, guess its just not my thing XD
 

ZeroX

New member
Feb 19, 2007
185
0
0
Vancouver
I totally agree with you. As it is right now we're overpaying and signing ridiculously long contracts with our goalie and d.men while not focusing on what the team really needs. And even for those Luongo fans out there, come on think about it, 12 years? Its just too excessive.
What some people in this thread don't understand is that Luongo most likely won't play until he is 43. If Luongo decides to retire when he's 40 after the 18/19 season with 3 years left in his contract, the remaining $16 million of his cap hit disappears. That is because if you sign a contract before you're 35, the cap hit for that contract goes away when you retire. In the unlikely event he chooses not to retire when he's 40 and wants to play out his entire contract, the Canucks have a few options to deal with the remaining $16 million cap hit.


-They can buy out his last three years for $3.16 million ([1.6+1+1]*2/3) and his cap hit would be $400,000 for the next 6 years.

-They can send him to the minors, pay him his full 3.6 mil but take none of the cap hit.

-They can trade him or waive him.

-They can let him play if he's still worth the hit.

-If he chooses to retire when he's 39 after the 17/18 season with $7 million remaining over 4 years, then the Canucks are freed of $21.3 million of cap hit.
 

aznboi9

Don't mind me...
May 3, 2005
1,380
3
38
Here Be Monsters
What some people in this thread don't understand ...
There are some things that some people will just never understand.
 

owz

Supreme Poon Master
Feb 25, 2007
303
2
0
So the bandwagons say it's only $5.33 mil cap hit...well, if the Nucks quit friggin' overpaying stay-at-home Dmen like Mitchell $3.5mil/yr, you've got plenty of room to add TWO Top 6 forwards in this pathetic offense of ours...at least one sane fan out there who called in today reminded of some bad signings
First of all, Mitchell was a Nonis signing.
My 2nd point is, which 2 FREE AGENT top 6 forwards can you
sign for $8.83 million? :cool:

What some people in this thread don't understand is that Luongo most likely won't play until he is 43. If Luongo decides to retire when he's 40 after the 18/19 season with 3 years left in his contract, the remaining $16 million of his cap hit disappears. That is because if you sign a contract before you're 35, the cap hit for that contract goes away when you retire. In the unlikely event he chooses not to retire when he's 40 and wants to play out his entire contract, the Canucks have a few options to deal with the remaining $16 million cap hit.


-They can buy out his last three years for $3.16 million ([1.6+1+1]*2/3) and his cap hit would be $400,000 for the next 6 years.

-They can send him to the minors, pay him his full 3.6 mil but take none of the cap hit.

-They can trade him or waive him.

-They can let him play if he's still worth the hit.

-If he chooses to retire when he's 39 after the 17/18 season with $7 million remaining over 4 years, then the Canucks are freed of $21.3 million of cap hit.
Agree with most everything you'd said, except for the fact that he has a no-trade clause
with this contract (doesn't mean that he can't be traded, but means that he can decide where).
 

BJhunter

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2006
3,536
31
48
There are some things that some people will just never understand.
To understand or not to understand, that's the question ;) Whatever the saying is...haha

So in his first year, he's pulling in $10 mill, and after that $6.7 for a few more years--whoa, that's a lot of cap room to eat for a team like the Nucks who are NO CLOSER to winning the whole she-bang than a few years ago.

Lou will NEVER be a Roy or Hasek who can win Cups all on his own. If u remember the 90s, these goalies only need their teams to score 2 goals to win on most nights!!:eek:

I"m not being negative, that's the truth. He would've done it by now, even on those Panther teams. No doubt, Lou is still in Top 3 in this league, but I take the other 3 (Brodeur) ANY day (of course, they've all won Cups).:p
 

cantthinkofname

New member
May 30, 2008
35
0
0
To understand or not to understand, that's the question ;) Whatever the saying is...haha

So in his first year, he's pulling in $10 mill, and after that $6.7 for a few more years--whoa, that's a lot of cap room to eat for a team like the Nucks who are NO CLOSER to winning the whole she-bang than a few years ago.

Lou will NEVER be a Roy or Hasek who can win Cups all on his own. If u remember the 90s, these goalies only need their teams to score 2 goals to win on most nights!!:eek:

I"m not being negative, that's the truth. He would've done it by now, even on those Panther teams. No doubt, Lou is still in Top 3 in this league, but I take the other 3 (Brodeur) ANY day (of course, they've all won Cups).:p
what Cup did Hasek win all on his own, "expert"? The one with Lidstrom, Yzerman, Shanny, Fedorov, Larionov, Hull...................... or the one where he backed up Chris Osgood? I'm eager for you to enlighten me and tell me which mysterious third Cup he won that I for some reason don't know about
 

BJhunter

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2006
3,536
31
48
what Cup did Hasek win all on his own, "expert"? The one with Lidstrom, Yzerman, Shanny, Fedorov, Larionov, Hull...................... or the one where he backed up Chris Osgood? I'm eager for you to enlighten me and tell me which mysterious third Cup he won that I for some reason don't know about
It's pretty simple, really. All u have to do is open yr eyes and see the pressure saves Hasek made when he won the Cup.

Don't recall Luo making those clutch saves against Anaheim or Chicago :p:p:p

All sarcasm & joking aside, let's take a deep breath and relax, and think about Lou's playoffs. Doesn't hv much to even compare him to the Roys, Brodeurs, that'll be insulting them.

What u have to ask yrself, Cantthinkofme, is why the fanatical defence of Lou when he hasn't done much in terms of playoffs. Sure, he's a great regular season goalie.
 

aznboi9

Don't mind me...
May 3, 2005
1,380
3
38
Here Be Monsters
To understand or not to understand, that's the question ;) Whatever the saying is...haha
Yes, what is there to understand except that his cap hit is 5.33 mill, not 10 or 6.7 or whatever else you think it to be.
 

BJhunter

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2006
3,536
31
48
I actually agree with you on this 100% and I also don't understand them giving Steve Bernier 2 Million. That boggles my mind.
You bet I'm going to mark this down, Hubba & BJH thinking along the same lines, kinda like Stevens and Niedermeyer? Me being Scottie, if u mind? ;)

Bernier's a joke. Him, along with Pyatt, gotta be the biggest pylons since Jim the House Sandlak...lol
 

timmay

New member
Feb 9, 2009
4
0
1
This is a great deal for the canucks, as long as Luongo can play to the same caliber he is playing currently for the next 6 or 7 years...after that he probably ends up retiring anyways

I do agree the NHL needs to close this loophole as it takes away from the whole free agency excitment and the whole point of even having a salary cap.
 

ZeroX

New member
Feb 19, 2007
185
0
0
Vancouver
Yes, what is there to understand except that his cap hit is 5.33 mill, not 10 or 6.7 or whatever else you think it to be.
THIS

BJhunter needs to learn how the new CBA works.

The cap hit for the ENTIRE term of the contract will be 5.33 million per season. So even though Luongo will make $10 million two seasons from now his cap hit for that season will still be 5.33 mil.
 

bcneil

I am from BC
Aug 24, 2007
2,095
0
36
THIS

BJhunter needs to learn how the new CBA works.

The cap hit for the ENTIRE term of the contract will be 5.33 million per season. So even though Luongo will make $10 million two seasons from now his cap hit for that season will still be 5.33 mil.
He knows how it works, he just sees what he wants to see in this contract.

It boils down to an 8yr contract with a 5.33mil hit each year.
Luongo will actually make more, but it doesn't affect anything, except his and the owners pocketbooks. The 5.33 mil ranks him 9th among goalies.

There was talk for days prior that it would be 4-6yr at 7.5-8.0mil. I am glad we did not get this.

I also think there is more to this contract that we know yet. Gillis mentioned how both sides have out clauses well before the 12 years. I would love to know more about that.

Its kinda funny, I was listening to a sports radio show from Detroit of all places.
Callers were calling in. Mad as hornets cause Lou's contract isn't fair, and the Canucks are using loopholes to get him way cheaper than he's worth. How the NHL should investigate and cancel the contract, and fine the Canucks, and even take away our draft picks next year for doing this. It was really funny.
 
Last edited:

Obelisk

Banned
Aug 27, 2009
3
1
0
This just means it will be another 12 years without a stanley cup. I thought the point was to IMPROVE the team not make it worse. Seriously the guy is a sieve. He plays fine during the reg season but you dont get a cup for that. He licks balls during playoffs and he gets rewarded with $64million. If your gonna blow all that cash, just flush it down the toilet, dont give it to that fucking tosser.
 

owz

Supreme Poon Master
Feb 25, 2007
303
2
0
This just means it will be another 12 years without a stanley cup. I thought the point was to IMPROVE the team not make it worse. Seriously the guy is a sieve. He plays fine during the reg season but you dont get a cup for that. He licks balls during playoffs and he gets rewarded with $64million. If your gonna blow all that cash, just flush it down the toilet, dont give it to that fucking tosser.
I smell TROLL.... :D
 
Dec 2, 2002
3,411
5
0
Poon City
lol amusing comment


This just means it will be another 12 years without a stanley cup. I thought the point was to IMPROVE the team not make it worse. Seriously the guy is a sieve. He plays fine during the reg season but you dont get a cup for that. He licks balls during playoffs and he gets rewarded with $64million. If your gonna blow all that cash, just flush it down the toilet, dont give it to that fucking tosser.
 

BJhunter

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2006
3,536
31
48
I smell TROLL.... :D
dude, why? i've been preaching that all year, Lou's not a playoff performer, yet...but i'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, he'll eventually will get better and improve, and why wouldn't he? he's talented...but unlike 'Roy et al, he'll take longer to start winning series by himself...
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts