Gotta say that I am not a big fan of guaranteed contracts butNot a fan of 12 year contracts, it's a joke. You have no control over a player plus in 5 yrs. he will be 35. It's the fans who always get screwed in these deals. Tell me one long term deal that has ever worked out for a team and not just the player? Time to get away from guaranteed contracts and no trade clauses in all sports all together.
Brodeur is at $5.2 million until 2012 and he will be 40 by then.I cant believe they would spend that much on a guy who has won?????????????
Brodeur at half the price and has proven himself, if they dont win a cup in the next 2 - 3 years then the whole deal will flop and they will have to rebuild
Roberto Luongo has signed to a 12 year contract.
Details are sparse right now but assuming that he
has got a no-trade with this deal, this would effectively
ensure that he will be a Canuck for life (barring a request
for trade). Thoughts?
You have to consider the economics of the time the contract was signed. The other factor is age/ earning potential.I cant believe they would spend that much on a guy who has won?????????????
Brodeur at half the price and has proven himself, if they dont win a cup in the next 2 - 3 years then the whole deal will flop and they will have to rebuild
Someone stated in an earlier thread that if the player signs a contract before the age of 35 and then retires with years still left on the contract, the cap hit no longer applies. So this is how the teams get around the cap to pay the players more.I also think the problem with the long term contracts, if the player stops playing (and I am sure there are some conditions) the salary still counts in the cap.... I remember hearing something with a team this year..
BINGO. Snow signed him to a $4.5 million average WITHOUT FRONT LOADING THE CONTRACT! That's $4.5 million cap hit per year until 2021-2022. Good luck thinking that DP won't linger around to collect that $4.5 in that final year...People have compared it to the DiPietro deal with the Islanders, but they aren't even close. DiPietro is signed for a looong time, at big $ for the whole term... essentially neutering the Islanders Franchise. Luongo's deal has an exit strategy built in to it.
Given that info, it's basically an 8 year deal, which is more than I would prefer, but the relief during the final 3 years is substantial, making it almost certain he will retire after year 8 or 9. It also gives him some trade value during the middle years of the deal, even if his level of play declines somewhat, because a team acquiring him will know it's not a long term commitment or a big cap hit.And here is Lui's contract (the $6.75 cap hit is for the current contract expiring after next season)...
http://www.nhlnumbers.com/overview.php?team=VAN&season=0910&expand=y
Seems like a good deal to me...plus...who needs someone like Auld coming to the team??, not me! No thanks...Although we did not get to the Stanley Cup I believe Luongo has proven himself despite the flop at the last game. Give the guy a chance, and my goodness, you men are never happy when it comes to sport's trades, paychecks or coaches...Brodeur is at $5.2 million until 2012 and he will be 40 by then.
Lui will be $8+ million range during the same period and be what
most people would regard as the prime of his career at age 33.
Yup, especially coming from Gillis, who had never been a fan of long-term contracts, as a GM...just a typical, hypocritical Canucklehead...sure, at the end of the day, the 12 yrs ain't going to affect my life or the Perbs or the Nuckleheads in this city personally, unless one has any moronic interest to watch overpaid athletes---playing ice hockey!!!!I still think these 12 year deals are absolutely retarded >.>
Agreed, but then again, franchise goalies don't grow on trees. So I have no problem making an exception in this case.I still think these 12 year deals are absolutely retarded >.>






