I made a boo boo... it was the SP that received the rides and merchandise... so what exactly did the client receive for the review? I guess just being in her holier than thou presence while giving her free rides and merchandisemaverick73 said:
review or shill?
- Thread starter Very Veronica
- Start date
OK, enough is enough...50 Mile Radius said:
50, here is the rule of thumb:
"I" before "E", except after "C"...
So it's believe, not beleive...
Sheesh!
Hijack Mode: Activate...
"there's a silent C..."
or...
"hey I'm just a hick from the Interior..."
or
"whatever, the Oil are still the best team in the league"
Hijack Mode: De-activate...
SWG
watch... he'll come back with some nonsense likeMaury Beniowski said:
"there's a silent C..."
or...
"hey I'm just a hick from the Interior..."
or
"whatever, the Oil are still the best team in the league"
Hijack Mode: De-activate...
SWG
Last edited:
Damn Maury, Sorry.....Maury Beniowski said:
I've always had trouble with that one....
Beleive me, I'll do better next time
OMFG Thats way too funny! Just so happens you owe me a new laptop as you made me spit my coffee all over it!gravitas said:
Scotty
YMMV and beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
One person's perfect SP is not necessarily everyone's idea of perfection.
If the description is too good to be true then it probably is.
Perfect 10's across the board is very hard to get in my books.
One person's perfect SP is not necessarily everyone's idea of perfection.
If the description is too good to be true then it probably is.
Perfect 10's across the board is very hard to get in my books.
To Veronica. re: reviews.
Most time I think reviews are pretty much truthful.
Yes, some may also be shills. If the Sp asks you to do it, it will be good for her. Why IF she asked you to post a review would you give her a bad one.
I find when I write them I don't really like adding the detials of what the two of us did in regards to postions and chatted about. That I find boring.
I try and make them a bit entertianing, and informative.
Each guy has to make up his mind. He knows the kind of lady he likes.
The Sp's are really tied to thier reputation and any posts on Perb.
Web sites and pics are ways to sell themselves. Just like any business.
I do like to try and contact the girl before hand and maybe chat a bit before I see her. That is not always possible.
Anyway!!! Veronica, I knew from reading your posts and your pics that we would hit it off right away and we did.
It is just a matter of gathering info, word of mouth and how much you want or can afford.
Most time I think reviews are pretty much truthful.
Yes, some may also be shills. If the Sp asks you to do it, it will be good for her. Why IF she asked you to post a review would you give her a bad one.
I find when I write them I don't really like adding the detials of what the two of us did in regards to postions and chatted about. That I find boring.
I try and make them a bit entertianing, and informative.
Each guy has to make up his mind. He knows the kind of lady he likes.
The Sp's are really tied to thier reputation and any posts on Perb.
Web sites and pics are ways to sell themselves. Just like any business.
I do like to try and contact the girl before hand and maybe chat a bit before I see her. That is not always possible.
Anyway!!! Veronica, I knew from reading your posts and your pics that we would hit it off right away and we did.
It is just a matter of gathering info, word of mouth and how much you want or can afford.
Paranoia
To say that all reviews are shilling is fairly paranoid. Like everyone on this board is trying to fool you into having sex with a 20 year old hard body. It's a conspiracy!
To say that all reviews are shilling is fairly paranoid. Like everyone on this board is trying to fool you into having sex with a 20 year old hard body. It's a conspiracy!
I haven't done a review in a while but early in my posting career (first 100 posts) I wrote several reviews and was very truthful. A review/session is very YMMV of course but I think most here can spot a duck. The proof is there if anyone is ambitious enough to do the digging. For example, how many poor reviews are there of Lisa G, Avarice, VV, Julia, A. Fame, Ingrid, etc? I don't think I've seen any. The ones to be suspicious about are the girls that pop up briefly, have one awesome (but usually poorly written) review with several others that contradict it followed by a "shill hunt". These reviews are also usually written by someone with minimum posts who just recently became a member and who, as stated above, writes poorly.
That said, I would put a lot of stock in any review written about any of the well established ladies here and would also lend a lot of weight to a review of a lesser known lady if the review was written by a respected member . Long story short, I have a lot of faith in the board here and its members.
That said, I would put a lot of stock in any review written about any of the well established ladies here and would also lend a lot of weight to a review of a lesser known lady if the review was written by a respected member . Long story short, I have a lot of faith in the board here and its members.
what I' m saying is that most reviews are truthful and the reason that there are so many good reviews of ladies like yourself is that you (and the others I listed) are awesome sp's. I would be suspicious if there was a poor review of yourself, VV, LisaG, etc...sort of a reverse shill. The cream usually rises to the top...the trick is knowing when a good review is fake and as I said earlier it can be recognized many times by looking at the reviewers' history and the way the review is written. If you see a review written by someone with 3 posts who goes on and on about a lady who maybe has had spotty reviews in the past or one we've never heard of before, then caution must be taken.Avarice said:
How's that?
BTW, what was the Wild Onion fiasco?
You did'nt include a button in between Subjective & shilly poop!
I would have picked that one.
My opinion is that the integrity of the review depends on the reviewer/client & whether or not the SP is on the "DNR List".
Question for you;
Do you wish there was a client review list?
Dat is me wit me hunten rifel
Always YMMV
I've learned that. Not having a great deal of self-esteem, I don't expect great service, but I try to give it. I know that sounds backwards, but I've said before that a woman who enjoys the session is as much of a turn-on as her getting me off time and time again. That said, not everyone responds to each other in such a responsive manner. I always consider the reviews as an A1 experience, else why else write about it, and anticipate that I'll have whatever experience transpires.
Hope for the best, expect the worst is too strong a term for it; that involves pessimism that has no place in the contact between two people. But hope for the best, and have no expectations, for me, usually results in a very happy result for both parties.
Thankfully, sp's are highly sexual, otherwise they wouldn't be doing what they do (the classy ones). I think they ought to be rewarded for that.
Two cents, cheers, and have fun!
Ghostwheel
I've learned that. Not having a great deal of self-esteem, I don't expect great service, but I try to give it. I know that sounds backwards, but I've said before that a woman who enjoys the session is as much of a turn-on as her getting me off time and time again. That said, not everyone responds to each other in such a responsive manner. I always consider the reviews as an A1 experience, else why else write about it, and anticipate that I'll have whatever experience transpires.
Hope for the best, expect the worst is too strong a term for it; that involves pessimism that has no place in the contact between two people. But hope for the best, and have no expectations, for me, usually results in a very happy result for both parties.
Thankfully, sp's are highly sexual, otherwise they wouldn't be doing what they do (the classy ones). I think they ought to be rewarded for that.
Two cents, cheers, and have fun!
Ghostwheel
Ymmv
There are many reviewers that I trust – guys that have lots of posts that read truthfully. Nookie Monster and Smother are good examples (there are many others). Minor bothersome bits like Nookie always writing in the third person aside. I appreciate it when the poster delivers the message succinctly and without gratuitous acronyms. haven't been here long, but the few woman I have seen were accurately described by these gentlemen pooners. Nevertheless, YMMV, as I still believe there is a some sort of connection you either make or do not make with the woman, or I am able to fall in love for an hour or two, or damn, they are great actresses.
There are many reviewers that I trust – guys that have lots of posts that read truthfully. Nookie Monster and Smother are good examples (there are many others). Minor bothersome bits like Nookie always writing in the third person aside. I appreciate it when the poster delivers the message succinctly and without gratuitous acronyms. haven't been here long, but the few woman I have seen were accurately described by these gentlemen pooners. Nevertheless, YMMV, as I still believe there is a some sort of connection you either make or do not make with the woman, or I am able to fall in love for an hour or two, or damn, they are great actresses.
For me, I know that a series of good reviews about a lady means that she is a professional but for each individual, it's almost certainly a YMMV thing. That's when I right a review, I try to give the feel or vibe of the session as opposed to the details as everything is subjective. I've seen some lovely ladies who were consomite professionals but very little chemistry while others it was bubbling out of the test tube.
S on that note let me throw a question over to you VV. When reading a review of yourself, or even others for that matter, do you like the penthouse forum style or a review that leaves something to the imagination?
