embellishing, no kidding. https://twitter.com/rooshv/status/694769625129717760?lang=en He apologized and nobody listened. he's kind of crazy though, his videos are super cringy. I expect Anonymous to be a bit more thorough and am wondering if Anonymous actually doxxed him, or if it was someone who was anonymously doxxing him.
Rape legalization advocate planning Vancouver meet-up for followers
- Thread starter Real Sonny Burnett
- Start date
I think he promotes the whole drunken sex with no consent thing, I read some blog that was against him and it has everything listed but I didnt check or verify any of it...
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/
Here is some commentary regarding his "rape" controversy:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...adeh-admits-considered-rape-deleted-post.html
"A controversial 'pick-up artist' has allegedly admitted committing what 'could be considered rape' by having sex with two girls he had to pin down after they resisted penetration and repeatedly said 'no'.
Daryush Valizadeh, who calls himself Roosh V, allegedly said he had to 'use some muscle' to hold one of the girls down so she would 'stop moving' in a deleted blog post titled 'When No Means Yes'.
The founder of self-styled men's advocacy group Return of Kings, who has called for rape to be legalised on private property, said he would be 'in trouble' if a video emerged of either incident.
'I've had two experiences which, if you remove all context, could be considered rape,' he allegedly wrote in a blog post on RooshV.com on 18 June 2010.
'Two separate girls, completely naked, on their backs resisting penetration for the first time. They squirmed around and kept repeating 'no' even though were moaning, kissing, and squeezing.
'If there was an edited video shot of what happened those nights I'd be in trouble if either girl wanted to screw me.'
The 36-year-old American claimed that he slept with both 'girls' many times after the incidents."
So what's happened is that he described an encounter in which he's said that the women he was with were playing a hard to get role which would have been interpreted as rape under current laws, even though (as he's described) not only were they happy to engage at the time, but that they've seen him multiple times since.
I understand what he's getting at here. My ex-wife and I have done this many times too, but if there was a video and somebody wanted to screw me I would be up shit creek. But she clearly encouraged me to do this.
So this guy is advocating that current rape laws be changed because of this. I get it. I may not agree with it, but I get it.
Now we have everyone here ready to stick broom handles up his ass because of this view - and because he promotes a PU artist book?
I think that the most ironic part of all this is that we have a group of pooners and escorts that want to push his PU artist meetings underground and suppress freedom of expression, when our very group suffers from this kind of suppression from the puritanical majority ourselves.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...adeh-admits-considered-rape-deleted-post.html
"A controversial 'pick-up artist' has allegedly admitted committing what 'could be considered rape' by having sex with two girls he had to pin down after they resisted penetration and repeatedly said 'no'.
Daryush Valizadeh, who calls himself Roosh V, allegedly said he had to 'use some muscle' to hold one of the girls down so she would 'stop moving' in a deleted blog post titled 'When No Means Yes'.
The founder of self-styled men's advocacy group Return of Kings, who has called for rape to be legalised on private property, said he would be 'in trouble' if a video emerged of either incident.
'I've had two experiences which, if you remove all context, could be considered rape,' he allegedly wrote in a blog post on RooshV.com on 18 June 2010.
'Two separate girls, completely naked, on their backs resisting penetration for the first time. They squirmed around and kept repeating 'no' even though were moaning, kissing, and squeezing.
'If there was an edited video shot of what happened those nights I'd be in trouble if either girl wanted to screw me.'
The 36-year-old American claimed that he slept with both 'girls' many times after the incidents."
So what's happened is that he described an encounter in which he's said that the women he was with were playing a hard to get role which would have been interpreted as rape under current laws, even though (as he's described) not only were they happy to engage at the time, but that they've seen him multiple times since.
I understand what he's getting at here. My ex-wife and I have done this many times too, but if there was a video and somebody wanted to screw me I would be up shit creek. But she clearly encouraged me to do this.
So this guy is advocating that current rape laws be changed because of this. I get it. I may not agree with it, but I get it.
Now we have everyone here ready to stick broom handles up his ass because of this view - and because he promotes a PU artist book?
I think that the most ironic part of all this is that we have a group of pooners and escorts that want to push his PU artist meetings underground and suppress freedom of expression, when our very group suffers from this kind of suppression from the puritanical majority ourselves.
