Yes. And next time I want your advice, I'll be sure to name the thread "Question for Hoops".
Question On Homosexuality
- Thread starter twelvetwentytwoam
- Start date
You'd be contributing far more to this board by writing a review then by starting threads like this.
I think the direction this thread has taken reflects my original disdain for your post.
It really had nowhere to go but down and it has done just that.
But you see, your wording is vague: "prototypes created and first used by the americans" could also mean that the prototype was created and the prototype was used, not the prototype was created and a production copy was used. I understood it to be the former, and I think it is the most direct meaning. Historically, many prototypes were in fact used by the Americans in many tests. Subsequent prototypes were also acquired and detonated by other countries (or ethnic groups, or whatever grouping you choose). I think your wording could have been a bit more precise in order to get your meaning. There are courses in writing you could take to sharpen that up, as it is a common Perb affliction to believe others can read your mind.
perhaps you are right, after all, you missed what i was getting at
what i meant was, the two devices dropped on japan were, compared to what the nations of the world later developed, mere prototypes of nuclear bombs
i was purposely being vague in my overall post - sort of looking at the problems from 50,000 miles out so to speak, to put them in what i consider to be their proper perspective
ah... well in that case, I have nothing intelligent to say because if that is your meaning, it's a bit deep for me.
Again, I really don't care what you think. It's called The Lounge for a reason. Open for general discussion. You want to read reviews then stop reading threads in here and go to a review section.
Homo sexuality.
Truthfully,
I think pretty much any one good be a homosexual
I think were just born with sexual desire, preferrably we do it with the opposite sex, but in the end we will do it or can do it with anyone or anything.
I should say if the sexual desire is there.
I watched a documentary on Robinson Crusoe he did it with goats on the island.
When I started this hobby, there were so many sexual things I would never do,
you know the lady i see has told me stories over the years about pretty much normal guys getting involved in this, and they end up dong weirder and weirder sexual things, eventually homosexual things.
and they come to her crying, disgusted.
you know i can see it,
I don't think homo sexuality is a big deal, at the end of the day, i kind of think we all could be homosexuals given the right set of circumstances, and that is all it is, how horny you are and the right sex of cirucmstances.
just my opinion, not a big deal
But the opposite is true as well homosexuals could become straight during the right set of cirucumstances. I think its a learned behaviour,
Population control
war takes care of that doesn't it,
Disease, denser and denser populations, and the ease with which we travel, one day there will be a flu pandemic or something.
Cancer, we are slowly killing the enviornment.
One day we will just go nuts and start killing each other, witness the boston bombing, etc
people just go crazy and get a gun and start shooting or build a bomb, but in on bus whatever.
In fact in parts of the world such things are allready common place.
It really is stupid, but it is a very cruel world out there.
Truthfully,
I think pretty much any one good be a homosexual
I think were just born with sexual desire, preferrably we do it with the opposite sex, but in the end we will do it or can do it with anyone or anything.
I should say if the sexual desire is there.
I watched a documentary on Robinson Crusoe he did it with goats on the island.
When I started this hobby, there were so many sexual things I would never do,
you know the lady i see has told me stories over the years about pretty much normal guys getting involved in this, and they end up dong weirder and weirder sexual things, eventually homosexual things.
and they come to her crying, disgusted.
you know i can see it,
I don't think homo sexuality is a big deal, at the end of the day, i kind of think we all could be homosexuals given the right set of circumstances, and that is all it is, how horny you are and the right sex of cirucmstances.
just my opinion, not a big deal
But the opposite is true as well homosexuals could become straight during the right set of cirucumstances. I think its a learned behaviour,
Population control
war takes care of that doesn't it,
Disease, denser and denser populations, and the ease with which we travel, one day there will be a flu pandemic or something.
Cancer, we are slowly killing the enviornment.
One day we will just go nuts and start killing each other, witness the boston bombing, etc
people just go crazy and get a gun and start shooting or build a bomb, but in on bus whatever.
In fact in parts of the world such things are allready common place.
It really is stupid, but it is a very cruel world out there.
Yep. I remember being one of those " I hate fags" guys but I chalked it up to youthful stupidity. I don't care who loves who or who's fucking who as long as it's of mutual consent and not harming anybody but it's kind of funny hearing people professing to be open-minded and in support of the issue when you know they're technically detached from it. I've said it here before, there's a very large percentage of the liberally minded, especially the male side, of the population that may say they're cool with homosexuality but if it was actually THEIR little Johnny sucking little Billy's dick or taking it up the chute they'd fucking freak. No doubt about it.
On the marriage side, I'm all for opening it right up. I've never been married, it's a good concept but in a heterosexual relationship if it doesn't work, regardless of the circumstances, it's severely punitive for the male. Man cheats on woman and they have kids, he gets caught and they split, he pays big time. Woman cheats on man and they have kids, she gets caught and they split, he pays big time. So in opening marriage up, two guys or two women should feel free to get hitched but if I fall for three women and they all agree they want to marry me knowing the others are also my wives, we should collectively be free to pursue that by law. If you change the rules for one situation, it's discriminatory not to change it for the other.
By the way, reading some the posts in this thread is unreal. I don't know if it's a reflection on age, maturity, ignorance, brainwashing by religion or so-called tradition, or people are just fucking around as I do at times but it's sure entertaining.
Just to clear up an historical inaccuracy, VanCity: Ghengis Khan and his sons did not wipe out populations unless these groups (cities) offered resistance. Like the Romans which preceded him, he simply required tribute and allowed the conquered cities to continue on in their respective lifestyles with their respective cultures intact. If they challenged him, however, he deliberately destroyed his opponents, mercilessly, and this afforded him a reputation for other cities which subsequently feared challenging him (the Mongols). After he died, the Mongolian Empire was divided amongst his sons and they eventually quarreled with one another.
As to the atom bomb, had the USA not bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war in Japan would have continued on another two years with the loss of one million allied lives and, of course, the concomitant loss to Japan. The Japanese were exceedingly tough opponents who simply wouldn't admit to loss nor give in.
As to the atom bomb, had the USA not bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war in Japan would have continued on another two years with the loss of one million allied lives and, of course, the concomitant loss to Japan. The Japanese were exceedingly tough opponents who simply wouldn't admit to loss nor give in.
Last edited:
That's one way to look at it. Another way is, historical recollection of WWII typically starts with the Germans yet it could be said a more accurate representation would be, it started taking shape in 1931. http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007306
The U.S. didn't actually enter the war until Japan bombed Pearl Harbour in December of 1941, still long after Nazi Germany commenced with their aggression. During the time the U.S. chose not to participate, millions of people, especially Jews (I'm not one BTW) were slaughtered while the Americans stood idly by, selling weaponry to all sides. Capitalism at it's worst or best, depending how you look at it. American revisionist history would have you believe Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary and the world should be eternally grateful to the U.S. for their heroic endeavour yet without much consideration for how their prior inactivity clearly resulted in millions of unnecessary deaths. If they had been involved earlier, the bombings were likely entirely preventable thus sparing even more lives. Lots of blood money made though and a foretelling of what we were in for with Corporate America and out of control capitalism.
But, hey, what the fuck does this have to do with two dudes or gals right to love each other, suck each others dicks, or rug munch?
Had I said the "likes of you", then it would have been the entire race. But then again, subtlety was never his strong suit.
I like how he calls it his theory. I wonder if he knows what a theory actually is?
You advocated for killing most of the Asian population to relieve the world of it's overpopulation problem but I am the racist prick. I think you need a dictionary and a few more brain cells...
Keep back tracking, you almost sound half-human now...
May I suggest a few introductory ESL classes or perhaps an "English for Dummies" book for you?
If you didn't care what I think then you wouldn't respond.
I'm all for general discussion, but this thread is a bad idea and it's only going to get worse thanks to you.
This actually made me laugh out loud at work!
pssst: the barrel points away from the face.
