An open Reply
Since I've read all the posts, even though most of you would say just let it go, I feel compelled to respond with the true story. Samantha is talking about me, but she isn't really telling the straight goods. Now I don't want this to be a "he said, she said" type of thing but there are things that need to be said.
First of all, we all have fantasies, some darker than others, whether it be, violence/rape, incest, school girl, whatever. The main thing here is that they are FANTASIES. Fantasies can be very complicated things and often aren't fully explained, let alone understood. I had started talking to Samantha on MSN about roleplaying and acting out fantasies. The fantasies that I have involve young girls...and I'm probably not alone in that fantasy judging on the school girl pics etc. I did make it clear that this was fantasy no matter what direction the conversation took. I never asked Samantha if she had a daughter etc., as there was no need. She told me that one of the reasons she was comfortable with the roleplaying was that she had a son and NOT a daughter. She also went to great lengths to describe to me on msn her other "age-dates" as she called them. One client she explained would have her call him Daddy and pretend she was his daughter. Again, obviously, someone with a dark fantasy who believes in theraupetic role playing rather than acting out an illegal and reprehensible act....much like myself. Now, I would never usually break a confidence and repeat what an SP or anyone else told me, but under the circumstances, and since Samantha doesn't seem to have the same restriction, I must at least defend some of the allegations she has made.
The real reason, has nothing to do with Samantha's appearance of outrage. It has to do with the fact that she stood me up on more than one occasion and I told her to stop wasting my fucking time. Apparently, she doesn't like to be sworn at. It was right after this last exchange on MSN that she posted her "question" of all the ladies. I won't even go into how supportive she was of my roleplay request, and how much she told me she enjoyed doing those sessions, but this was on msn and whether or not she had any intention of following through or not, she should have just been upfront and told me it wasn't for her rather than leading me on.
As to my fantasies, and again, I'm sure some of you have some that you wouldn't want reported, it is complicated as it is really not the young girl that I fantasize about, it is an adult woman, who pretends that she is a young girl to excite me and cater to my wishes. No one is hurt, no one is harmed, and I get to live out a roleplay fantasy in what (at least I thought) was a safe outlet. Am I a sick fuck?. Possibly, but at least, I act out in roleplay rather than actually go out looking for someone.
I have seen more than one provider who has no problem in the roleplaying. They do provide a valuable service to all of us and I thank them for that. Some, and thankfully, very few, like Samantha seemed compelled to take personal issues into a full blown attack with half truths. I'm sure she will have her own reply to all of this...the facts are as I said them. If they weren't...why would I even take the time to reply. I am not a pedophile....I have sex with adult women while fantasizing about young girls. I used to think that this forum was a terrific way to exchange information about the providers and also a great source of entertainment. Too bad, some people use it to make personal attacks because they feel they have been slighted.
My last word to Samantha...just be upfront and say you aren't interested rather than lead someone on, and use what they tell you against them later.
