The Porn Dude

Pot decrim bill dead!

rafterman

on hiatus
Nov 27, 2002
463
2
18
Blue sky country
Pot bill shelved until after next election
CTV.ca News Staff

The Liberal government's controversial bill to decriminalize marijuana will be shelved until after the next election, CTV News has learned.

The contentious cannabis bill has been sitting in legislative limbo for more than two years.

While the Conservatives oppose the proposed marijuana legislation, the NDP and Bloc Quebecois support decriminalization but they want major amendments, including an amnesty.

"It's been estimated about 600,000 Canadians have a criminal record as a result of personal possession," says NDP MP Libby Davies.

The government now concedes the bill will likely be put off until after the next federal election.

Prime Minister Paul Martin has pledged he will call the next election about a month after Justice John Gomery releases his final report on the sponsorship scandal, which is due to be submitted in mid-December. That would mean a mid-winter or early spring election.

"The problem is that it's an abbreviated parliamentary session. It's a minority government situation. Parliament is a master of its own procedure," Justice Minister Irwin Cotler says.

The bill would impose fines rather than criminal charges for simple possession and heavier penalties for grow-ops.

But some police officers want even tougher penalties and marijuana activists say the bill would only encourage the police to lay more charges for simple possession.

"This bill, I'm just as happy to see it die. It doesn't please anybody," says Mike Foster of the National Organization for Marijuana Reform.

Meanwhile, the U.S. is threatening major border delays if the marijuana bill ever passed.

"The United States is opposed to the decriminalization of marijuana," U.S. Ambassador David Wilkins has said.

Critics say this reason is significant enough to let the bill die.

"So it's not surprising at all that they are now trying to backpedal and get away from dealing with this issue because they are afraid of the reaction," Davies says.

With so much opposition to the bill, officials say the Liberals are content to leave marijuana reform on the backburner, which could mean it will be many more years before there is another attempt to decriminalize marijuana.

With a report from CTV's Robert Fife
Not a surprise but a disappointment :( !
 

shedevil

Banned
Jul 19, 2005
1,095
0
0
A SAVAGE LUST GARDEN
Well no one said that it was going to be easy...

rafterman said:
Not a surprise but a disappointment :( !
It's a disapointment, but it is an uphill kind of thing. 20 years ago, this would never have been discussed. Slow and steady. We will get there. It is still a free for all now. I find that I can walk down the street with a dubee and no one cares. I do not have a criminal record what-so-ever. I have never had problems with it I mean. It is disappointing, but it gives 'growers' extra time. It is also good that they postponed it because my dad says that a non-confidence vote and a new election would allow Bush to get a hold of our laws. Since 'farming' is in the familiy, this is good. I would not want this to be legalized because the 'illeagal business' is very profitable. Especially in Manitoba.

I can wait a few years, no biggie.

As for people who are in jail for marijuana convictions, and have records etc..
How would the government deal with this? I guess this is a big problem. They would have to oveturn so many convictions and adjust people's records. This would be rather difficult. I can see why they are procrastinating.
 

memyselfandI

Well-known member
May 19, 2004
707
546
93
shedevil said:
As for people who are in jail for marijuana convictions, and have records etc..
How would the government deal with this? I guess this is a big problem. They would have to oveturn so many convictions and adjust people's records. This would be rather difficult. I can see why they are procrastinating.
they would NOT have to I believe, though they might want to. Just as you can't retroactively prosecute someone for something that was NOT illegal even though later made illegal, the government is under no obligation to retroactively pardon people for activities that were illegal in the past (@time of conviction) but now legal.

At least...I think that is the case.
 

Juggy

New member
Feb 13, 2005
162
0
0
Good news. Now they can start writing the pot legalization bill. :)
 
Vancouver Escorts