Peter Jackson's Hi Def Hobbits?

Man Mountain

Too Old To Die Young
Oct 29, 2006
3,848
30
0
Vancouver
I haven't seen it yet but I know more than a few of you were excited about this. I found this review kind of interesting and am wondering what those who have seen it think about the comments here. Or just your general feelings about the film.

http://metronews.ca/voices/reel-guys/478148/peter-jacksons-high-def-hobbits/

December 13, 2012 Updated: December 13, 2012 | 9:45 pm

Peter Jackson’s high-def hobbits?
By Richard Crouse and Mark Breslin
Metro Canada

Synopsis

The prequel to the immensely popular Lord of the Rings films is a coming-of-age story for Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman), a stay-at-home hobbit from Bag End, in Hobbiton in the Shire. He’s content with his quiet life until Gandalf (Ian McKellen), a wizard, recruits him to help a group of 13 dwarves in their quest to reclaim their former home, the Lonely Mountain, and its treasure from the dragon Smaug.

Richard: 3/5
Ned: 3/5

Richard: Ned, as much as the story and performances, people will be talking about the presentation of the movie. Shot and projected at 48 frames a second — twice the industry standard — the picture is so vivid, so pristine, it doesn’t really look like a movie. Combine that with the 3D and it’s like watching mega high-definition. Every goblin wart and troll blemish is distinct enough to give dermatologists everywhere nightmares. What did you think of the mega-super-hi-definition look?

Ned: I have to say, the 48 frames per second was a problem for me. It often looked somewhere between a super-high definition 1980s BBC miniseries and a video game, and it just felt utterly un-cinematic. Saying that it doesn’t really look like a movie hits the nail on the head. Christopher Nolan has harped on in the past about film having a “warmth” that video can’t replicate, and I think I see what he means here. But the biggest crime, I think, is that the sweeping shots of the New Zealand landscape looked fake.

RC: Perhaps it’s like the difference between vinyl or CD. I prefer the warm sound of old-school vinyl to the hard digital preproduction of CD. The pops and skips are part of the experience, just as film blur and grain are a part of watching 35 mm projected on the big screen. Having said that, Gollum is awesome at 48 frames a second. The extended scene (for the record, most of the scenes in the film could be called extended), in which Bilbo and Gollum meet and trade riddles is one of the highlights of the film thanks to Serkis’ astounding motion capture performance.

NE: That scene is the true highlight of the film, and it coincidentally is where Martin Freeman, as the younger Bilbo, really shines as well. But even with this standout, Peter Jackson and company manage to spoil it (for me at least) by overdoing Gollum’s last line to beat the viewer over the head with another reminder that all this leads to the Lord of the Rings. It’s a bad habit running through the film that grows tedious. Elijah Wood’s cameo is particularly clumsy in this regard, with him basically describing what he’s going to do in his first scene in Fellowship of the Ring and then running off to do it.

RC: It may be clumsy, but I think fans of the series will revel at the chance of revisiting the characters!

NE: Well, they’ll have plenty of chances. If you like this one, the good news is it’s just the first of three movies.
 

Man Mountain

Too Old To Die Young
Oct 29, 2006
3,848
30
0
Vancouver
Is the IMAX version at Riverport at the 48 fps??
I'm not sure but I only see a reference to the "high frame rate" next to the UltraAVX showtimes on the web site.
 
Vancouver Escorts