Our SP's Look Rating System
- Thread starter Verb
- Start date
who? where? whaaa?
but who's this SP? Can you pass on the web address?
thx westwoody
Not that I would know who Brittany Andrews iswestwoody said:
but who's this SP? Can you pass on the web address?
thx westwoody
BlondeGoddess: I don't really have a problem with a girl's looks, to me her personality is far more important! I can think of a couple of knockout babes that were just horrible to be with, good from afar but but far from good. I do have a problem with girls who claim to be 5'9" and 130 pounds but when you meet them they are 5'5" with high heels and 130 pounds not including the 20 pound caboose. Just being honest and likable is far more appealing than posting some bogus picture in bad faith.
It must be nice to be able to thumb your nose at the people paying your bills, not many of us can get away with that. But who needs humility when you're a goddess?LOL!
Oldie But Goodie, the address is www.giababe.com/hostess.htm
The girl in the black outfit is Brittany Andrews, you can see the rest of the set on her website. I doubt Ms. Andrews would be too impressed with someone stealing her images.
We had a problem in Wpg with an agency posting pictures of their girls that turned out to be pictures of an escort from the USA.
It must be nice to be able to thumb your nose at the people paying your bills, not many of us can get away with that. But who needs humility when you're a goddess?LOL!
Oldie But Goodie, the address is www.giababe.com/hostess.htm
The girl in the black outfit is Brittany Andrews, you can see the rest of the set on her website. I doubt Ms. Andrews would be too impressed with someone stealing her images.
We had a problem in Wpg with an agency posting pictures of their girls that turned out to be pictures of an escort from the USA.
First of all i dont know how you say BG has a bad attitude. All she did was state what is very much true. SP's are not any different than any other women other than the fact they provide "service" to us men/sometimes women. They shoudln't be rated on some different high model scale as she said. I agree wholeheartedly with BG in the ratings and in fact do so. Baseline 5 average and up and down from there. Why have a rating system where pple put 10 at something that will never ever come across them and say they wont use it cuz it will never happen? wtf is the point of having a 10 then?hifisex said:
not trying to attack you here bud just pointing out that she didn't have any attitude IMO.
"Here's the difference BG...they guys who see you (and your crappy.....) are paying you.....when YOU pick your partners you can be as choosy as you want to be"
I'd just like to say that works exactly the opposite way around too just without the pay.
This thread boggles my mind.
I don’t even know where to start.
I don’t go to a strip club to see a bunch of average looking woman in plain clothes and hair stripping and showing their average bodies.
I want young hot woman with hard bodies and beautiful faces, firm tits and flat stomachs, and nice ass and legs.
I want the same things from escorts. I want to have sex with hot beautiful women. I don’t want to pay for time with escorts who I wouldn’t be with if it was free. After looks… attitude not personality is important for me. I don’t want to discuss culture, politics, or business. I want a girl that’s ready to go.
In my opinion, theres a lot of average and below average SPs out there regardless if youre using an SP or civilian scale (if you think theres a difference).
Clients should have to sugar coat things when they write reviews and discuss the looks.
Theres a difference between saying “she was a pig” and being polite and saying she was “very average and about a 5”.
REMEMBER, WE are paying YOU for a service.
The “Rock and Chad Kreuger” comment is a joke and in a way proves my point. You don’t want to have sex with average guys with fat guts, double chins and receding hair. If you were to pay for sex you would go for a “hot guy” not an average schmo.
I don’t even know where to start.
I don’t go to a strip club to see a bunch of average looking woman in plain clothes and hair stripping and showing their average bodies.
I want young hot woman with hard bodies and beautiful faces, firm tits and flat stomachs, and nice ass and legs.
I want the same things from escorts. I want to have sex with hot beautiful women. I don’t want to pay for time with escorts who I wouldn’t be with if it was free. After looks… attitude not personality is important for me. I don’t want to discuss culture, politics, or business. I want a girl that’s ready to go.
In my opinion, theres a lot of average and below average SPs out there regardless if youre using an SP or civilian scale (if you think theres a difference).
Clients should have to sugar coat things when they write reviews and discuss the looks.
Theres a difference between saying “she was a pig” and being polite and saying she was “very average and about a 5”.
REMEMBER, WE are paying YOU for a service.
The “Rock and Chad Kreuger” comment is a joke and in a way proves my point. You don’t want to have sex with average guys with fat guts, double chins and receding hair. If you were to pay for sex you would go for a “hot guy” not an average schmo.
At least five SP's that I have dealt with have been 10's, a couple of them also had such great personalities that they could have been a 5 and I would still see them.Two in Calgary, one in Wpg and two in Van, no need to go to USA or Europe.
thats because every guy can pick up different rated girls and that would throw off our rating systemBlondeGoddess said:
Waiflover, where's your head? Comparing rating cars to women. 1000 cars, of the same make and model, are made. The one you test drive and rate, all the others are going to be consistent.
SPs are not consistent. Grab 100 blondes with the exact porn star dimensions and bone one of them, I bet you that sessions with the others won't be the same.
SPs are not consistent. Grab 100 blondes with the exact porn star dimensions and bone one of them, I bet you that sessions with the others won't be the same.
Hey,I like this thread,lots of entertainment,,,personally,I think a 10 is unattainable,beauty is in the eye of the beholder,and like each individual,each one will have a different perspective of what they see as a 10,,,,,,,,,yada yada yada yada
k folks,it a brand new day and I'm sure everyone has taken their prescribed medication,some one take a stab at the thread
Well wackyboy, nobody would be a 10, the women I considered 10's were beyond reproach, so they were also unsurpassable!
And for those who are whining about girls being rated, this is the new global economy and everyone is in competition with everyone else...you might get lousy food at home but if you pay $200 for a meal at a restaurant you have a right to expect good cooking and good presentation. Would you go eat at a greasy spoon that served crap just so you didn't hurt the proprietor's feelings? And the greasy spoon also wants to charge $200 because they are nice people and very sensitive...they don't like it when someone says other places have better food than them...
And for those who are whining about girls being rated, this is the new global economy and everyone is in competition with everyone else...you might get lousy food at home but if you pay $200 for a meal at a restaurant you have a right to expect good cooking and good presentation. Would you go eat at a greasy spoon that served crap just so you didn't hurt the proprietor's feelings? And the greasy spoon also wants to charge $200 because they are nice people and very sensitive...they don't like it when someone says other places have better food than them...
i'm annoyed....but i do agree that this thread should NOT disappear. it's interesting to read and try to understand the lack of or evidence of wisdom in the opinions expressed. i think it was stryker's post, what is a 10 to one person could be a 5 to another. something along those lines...his post was real.
may i point out...that these 10's, aren't machines or computers that are programmed to maintain a consistent result. these 5's could be 10's and the 10's could be 5's, because, NEWSFLASH, they are people who have a life outside of the hour or so you request from them. believe it or not...you don't just punch in a few numbers in a phone and abracadabra...your perfect fantasy appears from a file cabinet. we CAN AND DO try...but sometimes it isn't always possible. life...OR here's an idea...our unions aren't always successful bc YOU CANNOT CLICK W/EVERYONE regardless of what the occupation is!!!! IE: we all need a doctor...whens the last time you tried to make one feel inadequate bc you weren't satisf w/them. it's just as private and intimate a relationship. you looked for another doc. it's unreasonable and unrealistic to think that bc of activities of this field that it makes sp's magical beings perfect 100% of the time. this is unrealistic, and i ask if you are a 100% proven perfect person...prove me wrong!! it might be you and unrealistic expectations as well!!! i think that sometimes no matter how hard we try...some of y'all are just NOT able to be satisfied no matter who you see. this is not our issue or burden to bear. this is why i disagree with degrading ratings. both ways. we could do the same...either way it would not be an accurate or fair to anyone. people tend to see a rating scale and take it as a concrete and absolute of who the rated is. visual!! they could be missing out on the best thing ever or experience the worst thing ever due to their dependance on you sr's "educated and experienced" cough.. holier than thou "ONE judge" opinions. again i state...it goes BOTH ways!!
luv ya...azen
may i point out...that these 10's, aren't machines or computers that are programmed to maintain a consistent result. these 5's could be 10's and the 10's could be 5's, because, NEWSFLASH, they are people who have a life outside of the hour or so you request from them. believe it or not...you don't just punch in a few numbers in a phone and abracadabra...your perfect fantasy appears from a file cabinet. we CAN AND DO try...but sometimes it isn't always possible. life...OR here's an idea...our unions aren't always successful bc YOU CANNOT CLICK W/EVERYONE regardless of what the occupation is!!!! IE: we all need a doctor...whens the last time you tried to make one feel inadequate bc you weren't satisf w/them. it's just as private and intimate a relationship. you looked for another doc. it's unreasonable and unrealistic to think that bc of activities of this field that it makes sp's magical beings perfect 100% of the time. this is unrealistic, and i ask if you are a 100% proven perfect person...prove me wrong!! it might be you and unrealistic expectations as well!!! i think that sometimes no matter how hard we try...some of y'all are just NOT able to be satisfied no matter who you see. this is not our issue or burden to bear. this is why i disagree with degrading ratings. both ways. we could do the same...either way it would not be an accurate or fair to anyone. people tend to see a rating scale and take it as a concrete and absolute of who the rated is. visual!! they could be missing out on the best thing ever or experience the worst thing ever due to their dependance on you sr's "educated and experienced" cough.. holier than thou "ONE judge" opinions. again i state...it goes BOTH ways!!
luv ya...azen
