Massage Adagio

Nucks

Ame123

Well-known member
Nov 13, 2020
400
301
63
It Petey had been 100%, Save-On might have had to pay out the million.
Didn’t he get two goals and you need 5 for the million bucks not very close would be nice to see but the young fellow that owns save on foods is a little smarter than the rest of us
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvsdaty

ModSquad

Moderator
Jan 19, 2020
541
2,427
93
Forget about a Bo extension,throw the bank at Petey.
I think Bo’s contribution this year has been amazing. Especially going to the net and mixing it up. Too bad not many Canucks play like Bo.

Boeser on the other hand 5 goals in 24 games is not playing like a 7M player. Not just Boeser there are lots of soft players on the roster.
 

Oldfart

Long Standing Member
Mar 31, 2003
4,627
2,827
113
Still lost in the '60s
Immediately makes me think of Jim Robson calling the game in the playoffs.

ADAMS, ADAMS, Greg Adams.

Can’t remember the playoff game but it was in the Pat Quinn era.
As a pensioner, I miss Jim Robson's special hello to those of us who don't get out to hockey games but enjoy the broadcasts.
 

Corym

Active member
Jul 9, 2015
259
139
43
back to back come from being down wins now for them now, wish them all the best in 2023.
 

sexpanther69

Well-known member
Dec 26, 2013
620
609
93
This team cant so anything right..... Cant even tank right.... Generational talent being compared to McDavid From BC and management wants to make playoffs jsut to get our ass handed to 1st rd......

Getting harder and harder (not the good way) to cheer on this team

Aqualoonie needs to sell the team and gtfo out here... Whole team shud be expendable except Petey and Quinn
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
4,945
852
113
Upstairs
Geez,are we actually above. 500 now
Only in the NHL " everybody gets a point" system. If they truly valued the fans (ha), fairness and rewarding teams that try to build winners, the scoring would be 3 for an outright win. 2 for an OT win. 1 for a shootout win. Losers get zip. Then watch the standings stretch out where the good teams show why they're good.

The current system is designed to make it look like all the teams seem close to each other. Everyone gets a participation trophy.
 

rlock

Well-known member
May 20, 2015
2,287
1,370
113
Only in the NHL " everybody gets a point" system. If they truly valued the fans (ha), fairness and rewarding teams that try to build winners, the scoring would be 3 for an outright win. 2 for an OT win. 1 for a shootout win. Losers get zip. Then watch the standings stretch out where the good teams show why they're good.

The current system is designed to make it look like all the teams seem close to each other. Everyone gets a participation trophy.

Basically, the NHL decided to eliminate tied games as a concept. A 10 minute sudden death OT is not even enough to eliminate them all, so the NHL adds a stupid shootout too.

But instead of revamping the points system to a bigger gradient or just giving both teams 1 point and ending with a tie, they invented the "loser point", because deep down they know the shootout is a bullshit way to decide a game.

The NHL management (especially Bettman) are gimmick-loving clowns.
 
Last edited:
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts