Not the answer she was hoping to hear

SFMIKE

New member
Jul 3, 2004
2,915
7
0
63
San Francisco Bay Area
She is young, and pretty, and in spite of this, she has been unable to find the man of her dreams: Relatively stable guy, with a "very" comfortable income.

The answer she did not want to hear breaks it all down into economic terms. Probably, IMHO, the best term he uses is "exponential depreciation" in referring to her looks, while his income is an "appreciation asset".

Bottom line for her is that guys in this category will date her, but not marry her. Fact of life.

Here is the text of what he wrote: (I doubt that this is written by the CEO of J.P Morgan, but the point is very valid).



"CEO of J.P Morgan's Fantastic reply to a Pretty Girl"

A young and pretty lady posted this on a popular forum:
Title: What should I do to marry a rich guy?
I'm going to be honest of what I'm going to say here:
I'm 25 this year.
I'm very pretty, have style and good taste.
I wish to marry a guy with $500k annual salary or above.
You might say that I'm greedy, but an annual salary of $1M is considered only as middle class in New York.
My requirement is not high:
Is there anyone in this forum who has an income of $500k annual salary?
Are you all married?
I wanted to ask: what should I do to marry rich persons like you?
Among those I've dated, the richest is $250k annual income, and it seems that this is my upper limit. If someone is going to move into high cost residential area on the west of New York City Garden(?), $250k annual income is not enough.
I'm here humbly to ask a few questions:

1) Where do most rich bachelors hang out?
(Please list down the names and addresses of bars, restaurant, gym)
2) Which age group should I target?
3) Why most wives of the riches is only average-looking?
I've met a few girls who doesn't have looks and are not interesting, but they are able to marry rich guys.
4) How do you decide who can be your wife, and who can only be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married)

Ms. Pretty

Awesome reply:

Dear Ms. Pretty,

I have read your post with great interest.
Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours.

Please allow me to analyse your situation as a professional investor.

My annual income is more than $500k, which meets your requirement, so I hope everyone believes that I'm not wasting time here.
From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you.

The answer is very simple, so let me explain.

Put the details aside, what you're trying to do is an exchange of "beauty" and "money": Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square.

However, there's a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason.

The fact is, my income might increase from year to year, but you can't be prettier year after year. Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, and you are a depreciation asset.

It's not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation.
If that is your only asset, your value will be much worried 10 years later.

By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a "trading position".

If the trade value dropped we will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it for long term - same goes with the marriage that you wanted.

It might be cruel to say this, but in order to make a wiser decision any assets with great depreciation value will be sold or "leased".

Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you.
I would advice that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy.

And by the way, you could make yourself to become a rich person with $500k annual income. This has better chance than finding a rich fool.

Hope this reply helps. If you are interested in "leasing" services, do contact me...

J.P. Morgan CEO
 

MissingOne

Don't just do something, sit there.
Jan 2, 2006
2,230
441
83
The "Awesome Reply" would have been more impressive if the writer had had a decent grasp of English grammar and syntax. Put-downs work best if they're well-expressed.
 

Big Dog Striker

New member
Nov 17, 2007
1,537
1
0
I also doubt that the CEO of JP Morgan would have the time of day to think of this. Basically, at first glance this is about the economics of beauty. No one can really stop the time clock of beauty but it can be nip tuck delayed. The girl you're dating right now might look like Baby Spice but decades after she suddenly becomes Old Spice.

These so-called bankers might have been fast in computing a person's depreciating looks but they failed to quantify INNER BEAUTY which is priceless and eternal.

The problem with these bankers and financial wizards is they always fail to look through the numbers and the bottomline figure. It's about pleasing the shareholders as in the case of the recent demise of Ebay in Burnaby and the cancellation of Singapore Airlines' YVR route. Both companies were making money but it wasn't enough. If people didn't take a chance then there wouldn't be a company named Google. Or reality television if Survivor creator Mark Burnett believed in everyone one in Hollywood who thought he was nuts.

A good example is this movie script entitled Three Thousand in the 80's which no one wanted. It was about the story of a businessman and an SP. A producer believed and took a chance on it and bought the options for $ 2,500. Succesfully pitched it to a wholesome studio named Disney. The original cast was Sean Connery and Michelle Pfeiffer but Connery thought he was too old for the role so it was then offered to Al Pacino who turned it down because he felt he wasn't corporate enough. Michelle Pfeiffer also decided to move on after the actors dropped out. The film which costs $ 17 Million to make ended up with Julia Roberts and Richard Gere. Then the Mayor of Jerusalem during that time Ehud Olmert, who also became Prime Minister, ended up recommending the title " Pretty Woman " after listening to Roy Orbison while viewing the film with the producers and the head of Disney. It became Disney's all time top grosser. In today's market, it would be worth about $ 2 Billion.

Sometimes you're character is gonna be tested and it takes a lot of balls to make decisions that are not popular. Remember, you only go around this world once, so believe in yourself and don't say YES for convenience sake. :)
 

Avery

Gentleman Horndog
Jul 7, 2003
4,782
19
38
Winnipeg
The "Awesome Reply" would have been more impressive if the writer had had a decent grasp of English grammar and syntax. Put-downs work best if they're well-expressed.
The original reply was much better written than the bastardized version posted by SFMIKE. This item has been circulating on the internet for two years, and has been altered countless times.

http://www.snopes.com/love/dating/golddigger.asp
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,132
44
48
Montréal
These so-called bankers might have been fast in computing a person's depreciating looks but they failed to quantify INNER BEAUTY which is priceless and eternal.

I think that was his whole point, she didn`t exactly seem like such an interesting or like-able person, and flat out offered looks as her (only) selling point. Not to mention the questions about rich men`s average-looking wives...? :rolleyes: That girl had no concept of what inner beauty even means, or that there is such a thing to begin with anyways.

I doubt she`d score very high in inner beauty or personality categories. lol
What a loser ! (not you, her ;):))
 

anonanon

Vancouver Blond Expert
Aug 29, 2006
1,228
4
0
Downtown Vancouver
Meh, everyone knows you just show up to a bar and whip out a huge wad and the golddiggers come around soon enough...:D

Or then again that could just be my dashing good looks? :)
 
Vancouver Escorts