"Non-sexual" massage.

[Herb_The_Perb]

In the various Vancouver papers' classifieds, in the midst of all the rub-n-tug advertising, there will occasionally be an ad that says "non-sexual". Allison Yeates is one recurring example of this.

I'm wondering what it really means -- is it code for no FS, or no FS and no BJ either, or does it really mean no erotic contact or display at all, with the lady being fully and conventionally clothed, and offering not even a HJ?

If the latter, why is it in with all the erotic massage ads? Why isn't there a separate section for non-erotic RMT licensed massage.

Also, in Canada, if a licensed massage therapist/practitioner works topless or nude, and/or gives a client an HJ, could that mess up her certification or her legal ability to practice? I know in the States it would/could.

 

[Oldfart]

In some cases, "non-sexual" seems to mean HJ only, no FS, while "strictly non-sexual" means no HJ at all. Unfortunately, there is no consistency.

 

[Syncmaster]

non-sexual massages

In the case of Allison Yeates, I actually had a session with her last year. After the 2004 Vancouver Sun Run I found myself with tremendous muscle pain etc and booked a seesion with her. It was a pure massage only, no HJ, fully clothed (her), deep-muscle rub. She used a lot of oil.

From a massage service perspective, her performance is in the top ranking (IMHO), I would view her in the same league as Chelsey. The only difference is that you have the option of additional service(s) with Chelsey.