I have used the board often for info and felt it was time to give a review again . Based on pics and description liked the look of nikita and booked with her a couple nights ago. Have seen a couple older reviews and found they were pretty accurate. This girl likes her job and from start to finish was very enthusiastic. The only bad being one restriction that was listed as available in her purity score. Know some guys like a lot more graphic details and info but I kind of like to keep it simpler. I had a great time with her and am glad I saw her but based on restrictions dont think I would repeat. Also though not that significant in my case I am also thinking spend 130 for half an hour at cc or 130 for 45 mins with the likes of Seven,Autumn,Brooklyn,Violet or Roxie at SU.
Nikita-CC
- Thread starter hazbeen
- Start date
Comments
Big sonny you are a big reason that I seldom if ever post anymore. I have found the board useful for info and try to contribute . I made a comment about the session I had with her. I did email CC with a question on services and did not get a reply back. I read her "purity" card and indications were she was open to said service. My only problem being if said item is mentioned as available I kind of expect it as part of the session. I was not dissing nikita as I said I had a great time with her but I was expecting a little more.Any one wanting further info may pm me. If you dont like my comments dont read them.
Big sonny you are a big reason that I seldom if ever post anymore. I have found the board useful for info and try to contribute . I made a comment about the session I had with her. I did email CC with a question on services and did not get a reply back. I read her "purity" card and indications were she was open to said service. My only problem being if said item is mentioned as available I kind of expect it as part of the session. I was not dissing nikita as I said I had a great time with her but I was expecting a little more.Any one wanting further info may pm me. If you dont like my comments dont read them.
i had no problems with his review, it was honest and i respect that. in my opinion when some does a review and you disagree with them, post a response that says why sp X is good, instead of attacking the poster. nothing gets accomplished when you start a war of words except for we all lose valuable info from people who don't want to post
Sonny, you flatter yourself with your own self importance. His post was legitimate. He went to see an SP who advertised a particular service but she told him she did not provide that service. If she provides the service to some clients and not to others then her "Purity Score" should indicate such. It's as simple as that. It's called "misleading advertising."bigsonny said:LMAO!
I am a reason you don't Post anymore....?
You jumped on him like you were her pimp. He was simply expresing his disappointment with an advertised special that wasn't there.
I gotta agree with bigsonny...if you're going to talk about restrictions that were not indicated on her purity score, you gotta come clean. This is a review board, after all, and it's for helping others make decisions about what SP's they might like to see.
So, what was it that she wouldn't do?
So, what was it that she wouldn't do?
Ok I'll be more clear, this sounds like a shill to me. Attacking a reputably good escort at one agency then listing some that he'd repeat with at su. If thats even what he's saying, its not quite clear what his point was but to slam Nikita, this has happened before.
ok i still don't understand. he went to see another sp at a different agency so he could shill for SU.thepro said:
besides he gave a mostly positive review except for for the restriction comment. the review was solid and there as been a lot worse said about sp's then he would probably not repeat.Those are some very nice pictures. Does anyone know who the brunette is in Mystery 2?E.Humperdink said:
