Newish review format

[Massagegirl]

Due to the discrepancy in reviews concerning different peoples tastes I advocate this format. It details skin, hair etc etc so people can make their own judgements on beauty. I received a review on the seattle board by Sir William who used this format, (where he got it from I don't know), and I thought it was great....

NAME:
INCALL/OUTCALL:
AGENCY OR INDY:
ACCURATE PICTURE:
AGE:
PERSONALITY:
RACE:
BODY TYPE:
WEIGHT:
HEIGHT:
BUST:
WAIST:
HIPS:
HAIR:
SKIN:
EYES:
FEET:
TRIMMING:
TATTOOS:
SCARS:
PIERCINGS:
MOLES/BIRTHMARKS:
CLOTHES:
GLASSES:
MOANER OR A SCREAMER:
ENERGY LEVEL DURING THE SESSION:
MULTI SHOTS DURING THE HOUR:
ACCEPTS FRENCH:
SMOKES:
DRINKS:
KISSES:
GREEK:
RUSSIAN:
WEB-SITE:
EMAIL:
SCREENING PROCESS:
PHONE:
LOCATION:
RATES:
RECOMMEND:
COMMENTS:


So lets give it a try shall we? And by we, I mean you lot...

 

[LonelyGhost]

why is any of that info important? hopefully she had feet and at least one eye to work with ... yeesh ...

did she give you less time than a Canadian Judge? had worse service than air canada? fewer menu options than a Lada?

that's what matters ...

 

[Maury Beniowski]

You missed out the obvious one; does she fuck?

I can just see our illustrious posters coming in with a pre-printed stat pad, requesting all the minute surly details...

Shit, all those details take the fun out of it...

 

[Massagegirl]

8 min doesn't sound that bad actually, I thought a good review took an half hour, at least.

Plus the whole point of a different format is so the info everyone wants is included, looks are determned by the questions and not just a meaningless number based on tastes and preferences, plus it cuts back on the sarcastic remarks and shill spotting which is the #1 deterent.

But hey, Seattles not here, to each their own. I am personally waiting for more votes to decide a consensus.

 

[hitrack]

An itemized review like that would only be cool if it was turned into being a search function.

A well written review will include most of that in a story form which I would rather read.

 

[DaBoneman]

I like it Massagegirl. That is the standard template that is used on the TRB in Seattle.

 

[timec]

A well written review will include most of that in a story form which I would rather read.

but wouldn't it have to be a short story to hold your MTV generation attention span (uhhh, you are the guy who keeps harping on that MTV thing, right?)

 

[hitrack]

MTV was soooooooo 80's man!!!! Get with the times bro. It's all about SMS. All reviews should be written here from now on.


here

 

[LonelyGhost]

bittorrent review:


"I came, I paid, I left."

 

[steverino]

Shouldn't that be:

I paid
I came
I left

 

[O-Shoes]

www.theeroticreview.com does this now and is probally the best for getting the point across: it would be good if this site did this as well.. This site is more about chatting and review. The Erotic Review is just that, it only reviews...

 

[dirk_dog]

It wouldnt be a bad idea of such a template existed that a user could click on when starting a review. This would keep it more organized and easy to read.

The problem is that a lot of those points are subjective or open to interpretation. Even stuff like height and weight can be way way off. Other points can change from day to day... like clothes style, makeup, and even personality. And then the bottom half of the list consists of a lot of YMMV areas.

I still like the "story" format for a review. It gives me a better impression of what went on in a session. The list provides info that is too generic. Its an ok starting point but 2 girls could have very similar profiles but very different experiences. This would come out in a story review and not in a list.

 

[Sir William]

Due to the discrepancy in reviews concerning different peoples tastes I advocate this format. It details skin, hair etc etc so people can make their own judgements on beauty. I received a review on the seattle board by Sir William who used this format,

Um, what?
I have never seen you, and I have never used this format

As we have never met, I'm certainly not trying to be rude. I'm glad that you advocate this format, but perhaps I'm confused - isn't this board for and by the clients, rather than the providers?

 

[jim]

I think it's a good summary of the information a lot of guys would like to have. Perhaps not in that laundry list fashion ( I don't mind it) but if the majority of these points are covered in a review I think you will have a complete review.

 

[CJ Tylers]

Hmmm... the bust sizes... when written in story form (it usually isn'y explicitly stated), most people glaze over it. When written like that, it appears as fact and you can't really glaze over it.

Now, I dare you to find a guy (who doesn't work in the tailoring industry) who can actually guess a womans measurements correctly

There aren't many of em... and I'm not one of em Perhaps a better description set would be:

Boobs: Big, nice & firm!
Tummy: Appealing
Waist: Not too small, just enough baby fat to get a good grip
Legs: yummy!
Tushie: Nice & firm!

 

[Very Veronica]

dirty laundry

I like the freestyle format of perb reviews however i'd vote for a client review section.

 

[Massagegirl]

Re: Re: Newish review format

Um, what?
I have never seen you, and I have never used this format

As we have never met, I'm certainly not trying to be rude. I'm glad that you advocate this format, but perhaps I'm confused - isn't this board for and by the clients, rather than the providers?

Are you the same Sir William from the Seattle review board? Cuz that is the guy who did a review on me and emailed me it's location. Unfortunately, it's down while they relocate servers but it's temporarily at www.thereviewboard.net.

As far as this board being for and by the clients, I'm not sure I agree with you on that. I think it is a sybiotic relationship between all parties, and one couldn't exist without the other. But I am ambiguous in that I could care less how people write their reviews, it makes no nevermind to me, I just thought it was neat and complete. Ha, that rhymes!

I was only suggesting this new format because I was sick of people criticizing/questioning newbies or others who post reviews that are incomplete because they have no template to go on. I find this method more factual and CJTylers has the gist of it...it's about your opinion still but for example skin would be clear or blemished, boobs would be small and firm, or pretty nice or large and full, or saggy with stretch marks etc. If you didn't notice, type "I didn't notice" or n/a next to it or omit the option entirely.

The facts would be there, and that IS what y'all want isn't it? Also that board just seems more mature, uh oh, I'm in trouble now...quick, must save...but you guys have more personality and maybe it is the storytelling that makes it a more interesting read. They don't seem to have shill-spotters or flame wars there, thats all.

 

[Raging_Geek]

Love the detailed data base!

I think it is a great idea!!

Prehaps formatted so that viewers can quickly view the important stuff and nitty gritty details are layed out in other sections.

Some people don't care about all that info, but some do - esp. if you have been dissappointed and wasted your hard earned money.

This is the kind of direction we are going in at bc-girls by providing a search engine with 63 similar attributes and an online review system - I think were gonna add more to our review system and search engine from your suggestions.

I really like the authentic photo for reviews.

And I really like the greek and russian for a search engine
(i.e. show me all girls who provide greek services)

 

[Hedonist7]

I have just been to the S. G Gibson link to the Edmonton Template for reviews and it is the funniest thing I have ever read...

Check it out: https://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&postid=225079#post225079

 

[yogi]

Massagegirl:
I don't think it would cut down on shills.
I've seen sites that use this format & they are full of fake reviews.
http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/search.html
for example, is probably 75% fake reviews.