PERB In Need of Banner

New Zealand: Hand over phone password at border or face $3,200 fine

Dec 18, 2016
770
32
18
Oak Bay, Victoria
By James Griffiths, CNN
Updated 1:18 AM ET, Wed October 3, 2018


Rights groups have denounced a new law in New Zealand under which travelers can be fined thousands of dollars if they refuse to allow border officials access to their phone.

Under the Customs and Excise Act 2018, which came into force this week, officials will be able to demand travelers unlock any electronic device so it can be searched. Anyone who refuses can face prosecution and a fine of up to $3,200 (5,000 NZD).
Officials can also retain devices and potentially confiscate them from travelers who refuse to allow a search at the border.
The New Zealand Council for Civil Liberties (CCL) described the new law as a "grave invasion of personal privacy of both the person who owns the device and the people they have communicated with."
"Modern smartphones contain a large amount of highly sensitive private information including emails, letters, medical records, personal photos, and very personal photos," the group's chairman Thomas Beagle said in a statement.
"The reality of this law is that it gives Customs the power to take and force the unlock of peoples smartphones without justification or appeal -- and this is exactly what Customs has always wanted."
Privacy Foundation New Zealand said members had expressed concern to the government during the consultation process about the retention of passwords by border officials and the safeguards on searches of devices.
A spokeswoman for New Zealand Customs said the change to the law was necessary as "the shift from paper-based systems to electronic systems has meant that the majority of prohibited material and documents are now stored electronically."

Invasion of privacy

While customs officials in multiple countries are permitted by law to search travelers devices, New Zealand is the first country to introduce a fine for those who refuse to hand over passwords or pin numbers to enable this.
Foreign nationals traveling to the US who refuse to do so can be denied entry if deemed to be "non cooperative" with border officials, and US citizens can be detained and their devices confiscated if they refuse to hand over passwords (though as the case of the San Bernardino shooter's phone showed, it can be very difficult and expensive to break into a device without them).
Both the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have sued the US government to try and force officials to get a warrant based on probable cause before conducting searches of electronic devices at the border.
The New Zealand Customs spokeswoman said the number of electronic devices examined is "very low." She added that of the 14 million travelers risk assessed and processed in 2017, "only 537 devices were examined."
According to CCL, New Zealand Customs had originally demanded they be able to perform device searches without restrictions, but lawmakers required that they have "reasonable cause." However, the group added the restrictions fell short of those placed on the police and intelligence services, and did not require reasonable cause.
Moreover, the civil liberties organization said the law could easily be avoided by those with something to hide and would primarily effect innocent travelers.
"Any professional criminal could easily store their data on the internet, travel with a wiped phone, and restore it once they enter the country," the CCL statement said. "Any criminal who fails to do this would surely pay (a $3,200) fine rather than reveal evidence relating to crimes that might involve jail time."
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,268
14
38
Vancouver
For a couple years now I just switch phones before travelling, and don't set up my email, etc. until I'm through customs. I don't have anything illegal in my normal phone, but it's the principle of the thing.
 

ddcanz

curmudgeon
Feb 27, 2012
2,684
20
38
right here and now
My wife and I travel to the US at least monthly on average. For years and years. We both carry phones, laptops, pads etc.
Never EVER have we been asked to produce any device for inspection.
 

badbadboy

Well-known member
Nov 2, 2006
9,536
302
83
In Lust Mostly
Random secondary inspections are happening more frequently these days. I'm traveling with a wiped phone and not taking any chances.

You have the right to say No at our border but it only raises suspicions and they dig much deeper.
 

niceon77

Member
Feb 10, 2005
174
18
18
All Around BC
Same here, an unlocked phone from Costco or staples is all I'll take with me these days. Not that I have anything to hide, but I just don't like them snooping.
 

johnsmit

Active member
May 4, 2013
1,296
16
38
Everyone has done thing to hide.
The fact that you are posting on a escort review board and have seen escort can needed as evidence against you inns criminal charge. Or even restrict your access to crossing the board. Is something to consider.
 

jamasianman

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2015
1,476
332
83
I recently saw a video of how you can hide. It was by two reprters. They said turn off siri because its voice activated and all that. Also back up your phone and return it to factoey settings. Delete any posts from social media that could be inflammatory. They said that its not a bad thing to let them search, but if you want your privacy you have to be careful.
 

treveller

Member
Sep 22, 2008
631
11
18
My wife and I travel to the US at least monthly on average. For years and years. We both carry phones, laptops, pads etc.
Never EVER have we been asked to produce any device for inspection.
So it's not a problem because it hasn't happened to you yet???
 

ddcanz

curmudgeon
Feb 27, 2012
2,684
20
38
right here and now
So it's not a problem because it hasn't happened to you yet???
Getting murdered is a problem and that hasn't happened to me 'yet' either.
I'm speaking of likelihoods here- not certainties.
And IME it's extremely unlikely to have your data searched at the Border unless you open the door somehow with inane commentary or some other reason that's puts you on their radar for them to suspect you or interfere with you.
Short, honest responses to their questions without indiscriminate engagement works every time.
I sometimes wonder about the occupants of vehicles ahead of me that are seemingly "grilled" for ages. What sort of inane responses are these people giving the Agents to warrant such attention? It's probably something as simple as not being able to answer a destination or duration query.
Just be prepared for FFS.
Call me naïve, but I'm pretty sure I'm not the threat they are looking for.
 
Vancouver Escorts