I never missed that point. Look at my past posts:You missed something important in my quote. I'll underline it for you. I think, no I know, I understand what's going on.
Some people think Julia Roberts is just gorgeous while others believes she looks like a troll. You get my point?
"We would never all agree on who is hot or who is not but I think we can for the most part agree that there are a few ladies out there who possess looks that are almost considered universally 'hot' - i.e. by 95% of normal, heterosexual, warm blooded men."
and in my last post:
"It is absolutely understandable that we won't agree on who is the most beautiful of them all (i.e. Lowermainlander does not agree with me on Ingrid/Tianna) but we do agree on what criteria we are measuring and that we are on the same page."
So what is your point? Because we can never all agree 100% on who is hot, we shouldn't give Good Guy any suggestions? Read the guys post: he wants a model type of girl and he's probably going to make a short list based on our suggestions - why do you have to get so technical about that?
The guy is merely soliciting suggestions for a hot babe maybe not technically the hottest SP as agreed by 100% of this board but at least a shortlist of reasonable candidates.
Based on your reasoning, you shouldn't ask for the best of anything that can be held to subjectivity (i.e. who is the best hairstylist, where is the best place to ski, where is the best place to live, who is the best actor, etc...)...
Believe me, I ain't trying to be a jerk but you are just overcomplicating something that is pretty basic to understand.