Miley 2389

[bradman]

Has anyone seen Miley 2389? Her body looks great and the pics seem legit, although they're not verified so you never know. I texted with her and she offered all the services I like, but her responses were also a bit robotic and the way she communicated in general was a bit strange, so I'm not sure about her just yet.

https://www.leolist.cc/personals/fe..._mixed_fit_curvy_body_ready_to_please-6186764

 

[bradman]

Bump. Anyone?

 

[JimDandy]

Bump. Anyone?

2389 , 5236 , 4993 , 3714 are I believe all the same group. Formerly 5060 and other numbers as well. In all cases the handler does the texting so that explains why the responses are robotic. What grosses me out more is when they reply with terms like "Sweetie" when you know it is likely coming from a guy. Gross, right?

The pics from this group are normally reliable though look for my very recent response to a 411 for Leah where I describe an example where the photos were fake. I think they used the pics of a former girl in the case of Leah. The Leah I saw had a destinctive look, especially her tats, and likely did not want any real pics posted for fear of being identified.

JD

 

[bradman]

2389 , 5236 , 4993 , 3714 are I believe all the same group. Formerly 5060 and other numbers as well. In all cases the handler does the texting so that explains why the responses are robotic. What grosses me out more is when they reply with terms like "Sweetie" when you know it is likely coming from a guy. Gross, right?

The pics from this group are normally reliable though look for my very recent response to a 411 for Leah where I describe an example where the photos were fake. I think they used the pics of a former girl in the case of Leah. The Leah I saw had a destinctive look, especially her tats, and likely did not want any real pics posted for fear of being identified.

JD

Thanks JD. Interesting theory. I'm aware that 5236 and 3714 are the same group, but I had never heard of this 4993 number and I'm not sure if 2389 is associated with them as well. That would definitely explain the strange text communication, although there could be many explanations for that (poor English from the girl, lazy texting, auto replies set up, giving the shortest answers possible and not reading questions properly because she's overwhelmed with too many texts, etc.).

Is there anything in particular that leads you to believe that this ad is part of that group?

P.S. - Yes, it's disgusting when you know some pimp is calling you hun, babe, sweetie, etc.

 

[JimDandy]

Thanks JD. Interesting theory. I'm aware that 5236 and 3714 are the same group, but I had never heard of this 4993 number and I'm not sure if 2389 is associated with them as well. That would definitely explain the strange text communication, although there could be many explanations for that (poor English from the girl, lazy texting, auto replies set up, giving the shortest answers possible and not reading questions properly because she's overwhelmed with too many texts, etc.).

Is there anything in particular that leads you to believe that this ad is part of that group?

P.S. - Yes, it's disgusting when you know some pimp is calling you hun, babe, sweetie, etc.

I will tell you what I know for sure is 100% true:

1) That the person who is texting is not the girl actually working. I cannot go into details as to how I know this for privacy reasons.
2) That they work out of the same building on Beach Ave.

I will admit that I do not know for sure that it is not 2 separate groups. But if it is, the above 2 statements are definitely true for both groups.

JD