The Porn Dude

Mia Mae, Katya Rose

dickencyder

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2005
543
370
63
Has anyone seem them recently ie last 6 months? I noticed that their numbers are different from when they initially went indy(0193 vs 7437). Also there was a negative post about Katya ghosting that seemed to have been deleted. Mia has started posting regularly again but also late night. wants $100 e-transfer. also photos have not been updated for quite some time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark312789

rockinbods35

Active member
Aug 12, 2007
591
146
43
Has anyone seem them recently ie last 6 months? I noticed that their numbers are different from when they initially went indy(0193 vs 7437). Also there was a negative post about Katya ghosting that seemed to have been deleted. Mia has started posting regularly again but also late night. wants $100 e-transfer. also photos have not been updated for quite some time.
I would be leery of sending a 100 e-transfer to any girl that is not extensively positively reviewed. This is probably why I see so few girls these days. Too many scammers and rip off artists operating in the escorting space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark312789

dickencyder

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2005
543
370
63
Katya orig 7324 now 0607 posted ~12am 3yr old plus pics

any new reports?

full disclaimer maybe 2+ months ago there was a Perb review about her where she took the deposit and ghosted. That review got taken down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark312789
Jul 31, 2018
33
10
8
Katya orig 7324 now 0607 posted ~12am 3yr old plus pics

any new reports?

full disclaimer maybe 2+ months ago there was a Perb review about her where she took the deposit and ghosted. That review got taken down.

hmm also wondering about this! thinking of seeing this girl
 

dickencyder

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2005
543
370
63
the way I see it neither of their former agencies vouched for them and none of their clients said anything. There still exists the mystery deleted post and Mods haven't commented. history shows their rate is 400 cbj and 200+ for extras. funny thing is now both of them post all day and err'day. GL to the TOFTT bro
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark312789

Thebean

Member
Dec 6, 2017
52
77
18
Can confirm that Mia Mae is not the original naya kai. Booked the other day and the provider I saw while gorgeous and young was definitely not naya kai that I saw a few years ago.
 

Monnoexcel

New member
Aug 11, 2019
11
19
3
Can confirm that Mia Mae is not the original naya kai. Booked the other day and the provider I saw while gorgeous and young was definitely not naya kai that I saw a few years ago.
Wow that’s interesting - wonder if it’s a different girl stealing their pics ? How was the session ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark312789

Thebean

Member
Dec 6, 2017
52
77
18
Wow that’s interesting - wonder if it’s a different girl stealing their pics ? How was the session ?
cant Confirm but it felt to me like someone posted those for her and she just takes clients.

session was good she’s young (20) with a smoking hot body and a great ass. But at her price range I was expecting naya kai and that’s not what I got so hard to be satisfied.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark312789

pizzaboy

Well-known member
Sep 21, 2014
313
481
63
Can confirm that Mia Mae is not the original naya kai. Booked the other day and the provider I saw while gorgeous and young was definitely not naya kai that I saw a few years ago.
Thats just super strange to me that someone would take the time to use someone else's identity and not build up their own brand if they provide good service.
Can anyone else confirm?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AverageJo

Magic69

Active member
Jul 23, 2020
72
133
33
Can confirm that Mia Mae is not the original naya kai. Booked the other day and the provider I saw while gorgeous and young was definitely not naya kai that I saw a few years ago.
It says in her ad that her reviews are under “Naya Kai” can anyone else confirm if it is or not I can’t imagine someone would try and take another providers name and pass it off as themselves
 

Biggalactis

Active member
Jan 8, 2017
278
168
43
Both girls are legit but would only recommend Katya Rose. Much better service & attitude.

Maybe we didn't click but Mia was more restrictive and seemed disinterested + low effort?

Katya was as advertised, provided GFE and overall good session.

Saw them 1-2 years ago so not sure if things have changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark312789

dickencyder

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2005
543
370
63
But is this current Katya the same as the one you saw before? The question is that Mia is NOT the original. Jury still out if Katya is the original one or an imposter. But there was a ghosted scam report about Katya that was removed about a month ago
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark312789

stamina

Active member
Apr 2, 2010
731
116
43
Reading about girls posing as known providers reminds me of the Lucy Lake imposter(s).

If anybody remembers, were the Lucy Lake imposter(s) actively pretending to be her? Or were they outright scam artists?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Biggalactis
Vancouver Escorts