Asian Fever

Melissa Farley and the US Government Want You to Stop Buying Sex

susi

Sassy Strumpette
Supporting Member
Jun 27, 2008
1,501
436
83
57
@the Meat Market!!!lol
http://magazine.goodvibes.com/?p=19180&preview=true
Melissa Farley and the US Government Want You to Stop Buying Sex
By Laura Agustin • Jul 19th, 2011 • Category: Blog, In the News, Sex and Culture

Yesterday, Newsweek released a report on Melissa Farley’s nasty new study on men who buy sex of all kinds, which was funded by the Hunt Alternatives Fund as part of their 10-year plan to End Demand for buying sex. Now the latest Trafficking in Persons Report reveals that End Demand is also part of US government policy, which means that some of the big spending - $109 million last year – on anti-trafficking programmes is going to anti-client projects. US Trafficking magnate Luis CdeBaca attended the Hunt planning meetings, so this development is hardly a big surprise. I recently wrote about a World Gender War in the form of campaigns against male sexuality: desire, penetration and the penis itself, an international trend, but money from a rich philanthropist certainly puts the US in charge.

The theory that if men stopped buying sex no one would offer it anymore is a breath-taking over-simplification of the many different services and desires involving money and sex and the multitude of social and cultural conditions involved. How people now selling sex as a livelihood would earn their living if clients disappear is never mentioned – which is disturbing. I appreciate that campaigners are talking long-term and utopically, but to never address economic and employment issues seriously? I hope they do not feel that preventing women from selling sex means saving them from a fate worse than death.

This notion of demand fails to square with some well-known client types, such as the one Thomas Rowlandson portrayed here around 1800, described by the Wellcome Library as A prostitute leading an old man into the bedroom and taking money from him; implying that her services will act like a tonic and preserve his state of health. I guess Farley didn’t manage to find any men like this to talk to.

Here is the End Demand statement from this year’s TIP, ridiculously called a Fact Sheet, when it is only a moral aside revealing the government’s wish that culture would change. Yes, they wrote the phrase new innovations.

Prevention : Fighting Sex Trafficking by Curbing Demand for Prostitution

A growing understanding of the nature of trafficking in persons has led to new innovations in addressing demand. Corporate standards for monitoring supply chains and government policies for eliminating trafficking from procurement practices are making new inroads in the fight against modern slavery. But the fact remains: if there were no demand for commercial sex, trafficking in persons for commercial sexual exploitation would not exist in the form it does today. This reality underscores the need for continued strong efforts to reduce demand for sex trafficking by enacting policies and promoting cultural attitudes that reject the idea of paying for sex.

Policies to Address Demand for Commercial Sex

Governments can lead both in practice and by example by implementing zero-tolerance policies for employees, uniformed servicemembers, and contractors paying for sex. If paying for sex is prohibited for those who work for, or do business with, a government, the ripple effects could be farreaching. Through their massive procurement, governments have an impact on a wide range of private-sector actors, and policies banning the purchase of sex could in turn reach a significant part of the private sector as well. At the same time, governments have the capacity to raise awareness of the subtle and brutal nature of this crime by requiring training of employees, contractors, and subcontractors about how individuals subjected to sex trafficking are victimized through coercion. Too often, trafficking victims are wrongly discounted as “consenting” adults. The use of violence to enslave trafficking victims is pervasive, but there are other more subtle forms of fraud and coercion that also prevent a person from escaping compelled servitude. A prostituted person may have initially consented, may believe that she or he is in love with her or his trafficker, may not self-identify as a victim, may not be operating in the vicinity of the pimp, or may have been away from the pimp’s physical control with what seemed to be ample opportunity to ask for help or flee. None of these factors, taken alone or in sum, means that she or he is not a victim of a severe form of trafficking. Ensuring that these facts are part of the required training for every government employee and everyone who does business with or on behalf of a government is an important step in shifting attitudes about commercial sex.

Moral Leadership in the Future of this Struggle

Strong policies are critical for ridding countries of all forms of modern slavery, but ultimately for encouraging a broader cultural shift in order to make meaningful progress in reducing demand for sex trafficking. This can only be achieved by rejecting long-held notions that regard commercial sex as a “boys will be boys” phenomenon, and instead sending the clear message that buying sex is wrong. Lawmakers have the power to craft effective antitrafficking legislation, but they also have a responsibility to represent values that do not tolerate abuses of commercial sex. Business leaders need to cultivate a corporate culture that leaves behind outdated thinking that turns a blind eye to the sex trade, including the adoption of codes of conduct that prohibit purchasing sex. And leaders in civil society – from teachers to parents to ministers – must foster the belief that it is everyone’s responsibility to reduce the demand for sex trafficking. It is especially important to reach young men with a strong message of demand reduction to help them understand the exploitation involved with commercial sex and combat the glamorization of pimp culture. It is every person’s individual responsibility to think about their contributions to trafficking. Laws and policies, partnerships and activism will continue to be critical to the struggle against modern slavery, but it will also be the day-to-day decisions of individual men and women that will bring an end to sex trafficking and carry forth a message of freedom for all.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Washington DC June 2011

–Laura Agustín, the Naked Anthropologist

Source: magazine.goodvibes.com (http://s.tt/12TfS
 

Umbras

Member
Jul 17, 2011
208
0
16
Vancouver
They just need to give it up, there is no way "prostitution" will ever stop, there is reason it has the oldest profession in the world moniker. Not to mention the majority of politicians prostitute themsleves to big buisness every day.
 

shockley

Banned
Jun 25, 2011
98
0
0
Haven't we beat this to death already? Why on earth would we expect to see a balanced and comprehensive argument regarding this matter on an escort review board.
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
This is typical of some peoples approaches to consumption issues that they see as "problems".

So, for drugs you have the "just say no" campaign and so on. Then they go hard on the producers as the "war on drugs". Likewise, they go crazy on sentencing with insane mandatory minimums.

I think that if sex becomes the pop cause we can expect to something similar happening in the US. Canada tends to be more rational and liberal when it comes to things like that, while Europe is relaxed and tolerant. The real problem is the US and their fundamentalist puritanical approach to social issues, in a lot of ways they are not dissimilar to the Taliban in their approach. Something I find ironic.

Most Americans are a lot more tolerant than the society they live in, but because the fundamentalist message is so strong there, the majority dare not find voice or they would be publicly vilified, so they keep quite. America is not a good country to live in as an individual.

As far as Canada is concerned it is hard to say how things will go. Obviously we get some spillover from the US because we are so close to them physically but usually we are somewhere inbetween them and Europe. With Harperites in control now though, I fear we will have policies a lot like those in the US, which will erode our civil liberty. Not in a legal sense, but in a moral sense. The pressure will be on to not voice our opinion, it is how the US system works.
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,132
44
48
Montréal
Haven't we beat this to death already? Why on earth would we expect to see a balanced and comprehensive argument regarding this matter on an escort review board.
Where and who could or should we turn to for a "balanced and comprehensive argument" then? Newsweek, maybe? I don't see how people personally involved, people whose experiences and motivations are being misrepresented could be seen as too biased and ignorant to have anything relevant or valuable to add to the discussion. What we really need is more people and experts speaking for us, right? Of course we all know outsiders are completely unbiased, so they're the ones we should listen to because, unlike people like us, they have no agenda. Hm yah. Sure.

But maybe I'm wrong, in which case you must know where and who we can find such a "balanced and comprehensive argument" so compelling and unbiased that individuals with real life experience are simply irrelevant when decision about them are made. I'm curious who this voice of reason and infinite wisdom about me might be. Sounds impressive if what they have to say trumps any direct personal experience.
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,132
44
48
Montréal
They just need to give it up, there is no way "prostitution" will ever stop, there is reason it has the oldest profession in the world moniker. Not to mention the majority of politicians prostitute themsleves to big buisness every day.
:nod:


The countries with the most poverty, the greatest corruption and the greatest restrictions on personal behavior are the places where trafficking runs rampant, because the law is enforced with not just a double standard, but a predictably privilege-based standard. It’s based on the social position of the client and the amount of money that changes hands…not from john to sex worker, but from john to authorities, from pimp to authorities, from sex worker to authorities. The idea that in poor and corrupt countries such a situation will be solved if we “abolish” prostitution by putting the names of johns in the paper (as Farley claims) is utterly laughable. Corrupt nations mostly have strong anti-prostitution laws. It’s poverty and corruption that need to be “abolished.”

..

The exceptions are, as I alluded to above, poor women and rich men. Rich men enlisting the services of poor women usually gets a blind eye, no matter what country and what aeon they’re in. That equation is sacrosanct and will remain so until we eliminate economics entirely. That’s why any enforcement activity against sex work always disproportionately impacts poor sex workers, and any enforcement activity against clients always disproportionately affects those who frequent poorer sex workers…especially, but not exclusively, lower-middle-class, working class and poor men who can’t afford to pay $200 or $300 for sex.

Rich men are never going to lose their options for hiring sex workers. In the Victorian era, just like in Saudi Arabia, just like in Washington, D.C. all you have to do is this: Be male, have plenty of money and exercise a culturally “appropriate” amount of discretion, and you can always find a woman who’ll fuck you. That is not going to change, no matter what country you’re in, what era you’re in or what law enforcement actions are taken. But what can change is how many poor sex workers face arrest, rape and prison time because of hysterical prohibitionist panic based on bad science.

..


http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/07/men-who-buy-sex-crimes-newsweek-trafficking.html







Wait, you can BUY sex? Why have I been renting it all this time?


“Buying sex” means, in Farley’s parlance, to frequent prostitutes; the use of the term “buy” is insulting. It’s a transparent attempt by Farley to conflate human trafficking with prostitution, and she’s been doing it her whole career.

But that equation is garbage; it’s meant to differentiate between non-sex services and sex…as a way of taking the agency out of women’s hands and placing it squarely in the hands of…who? Farley? No, damn it — men. Not to get too ’70s about it…but wasn’t that why I became a sensitive new age guy to begin with? So the women I knew could stop having their power taken away?

For what I hope will be the last time…but I know will not…get it straight: If you can “buy” sex from a sex worker, then you can “buy” therapy from a clinical psychologist or “buy” accounting from an accountant.

Sex is not a “thing,” it is a behavior — or, rather, a series of behaviors, with endless gray area as to where one behavior ends and the other begins.

If you can agree with me on only one thing in this post, I hope it’s that sex is not a “thing.”

Women are not “notches” that we guys put in our bedposts (or on the dashboards of our Chevelles). One does not “acquire” sex from a woman, and the very idea that one can is equivalent to the idea that a woman’s “virtue” is a finite quantity that can be taken away.

Farley knows this, but she also knows that you get better soundbites by claiming, explicitly, that slavery and prostitution are not just related, but are literally the same thing.

..

I beg of you, as a person of conscience, to forever reject Farley’s bankrupt and transparently sexist claim that sex is a thing that women own that men take away, either by purchasing it or by stealing it or by pressuring them into giving it up or by marrying them.

Sex is not a thing.

It’s not women’s job to “keep” it so that people like Melissa Farley will approve of them.

http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/07/men-who-buy-sex-crimes-newsweek-trafficking.html
:)
 

TooLegit

New member
Apr 28, 2011
47
0
0
The world is well on it's way to a moderate viewpoint. The only reason we are seeing this crap pop up so often now is because the extremists on either side are desperate clinging to their radical viewpoints.
 

Miss*Bijou

Sexy Troublemaker
Nov 9, 2006
3,132
44
48
Montréal
<p><a href="http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/12320488/thank-you-melissa-farley" target="_new" style="font-size: 14px;font-weight:bold;">Thank You Melissa Farley</a><br /> by: <a href="http://www.xtranormal.com/profile/6746437" style="" target="_new">Norma Jean_Almodovar</a></p><iframe id="xtranormal_Thank You Melissa Farley" name="xtranormal_Thank You Melissa Farley" style="width:480px;height:299px;" src="http://www.xtranormal.com/xtraplayr/12320488/thank-you-melissa-farley" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" border="0" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto"></iframe>


Lol
 

treveller

Member
Sep 22, 2008
633
10
18
Does the police board accept video delegations? It's onlty fair they know what we think of them.
 

the old maxx50

New member
Dec 22, 2010
779
0
0
I wonder what there point of view is on free sex .. All the people that go to bars , night clubs , parties .. looking for one night stands ... So it seems to be ok for the girls to get used an abused , cast aside for the next hot chick .. and they are ok with the guys attitude , they just want to go out and get laid .. If the girl get pregnant . not there problem it is the states ...

Escorting and other forms of the sex trade are not going a way.. we are not all believers in their moralistic attitude or simplistic thinking . I wonder how much funding they plan to give to LE to run sting operations, and prosecute the offenders.. I don't see it coming from government .. So this is just a bunch of mouth peaces trying to scare people to do as they want ..

I still wonder what these people sex life is like .. do they have one .. and what to they do when they have dirty thoughts ...
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts