There is no need to have any medical training to be aware of the risks. It is common knowledge than unprotected sex (either FS or bbbj) has greater inherent risks that protected sex. If you doubt this then you are an idiot. The exact percentages or transmission rates are irrelevant, all you need to know is that the risks increase with unprotected sex. If you want "emperical data" then you can search for it yourself but I'm sure you already know what you will find.Dazzler said:Meiko,
Do you have any formal medical training or education? You speak of risks, without identifying them? What specific infections do you believe can be communicated through BBBJ and their respective transmission rates?
Whilst I can appreciate your personal opinion and perspective on these acts, I would strongly suggest you instead engage in pragmatic dialogue using imperical data.
Personally if someone else wants to engage in unprotected sex with an SP then I don't really care. It is their choice, and as long as they realize the risks then why should anyone else condemn them for it. Everyone has different comfort levels when it comes to risk taking but that doesn't mean they are stupid for wanting to try skydiving or rock climbing or any other risky activities that people do on a daily basis.
Meiko you are certainly entitled to your own opinion and personally I agree with you, but I don't agree with the way you presented your opinion here. And calling someone stupid for doing something you wouldn't do is implying that you are better than them. They are just not as conservative as you, and are willing to take more risks.
I think we should all listen to expo joe:
expo joe said:I think we should leave this issue as a private one and "to each their own". Pooners and providers alike can choose to do what they want with who they want and under terms and conditions agreeable to each other....
Last edited:





