Do I win a prize? Hmm....Hey she heard your advice and boosted her age to 19 in her ad, so all is well.
The provider can choose how they want to conduct their business and she has the right to refuse service. Poonertime, if you do not agree with her terms you are free to shop else where. By no means should she be required to operate under your standards. Judging by her pics, she wont suffer because you're not calling.I think Lexi should post as a 19 year old and drop the pic request due to the current legal climate.
How about cock shots Lexi? Harder to trace.
It is against the law for anyone to offer or obtain the sexual services of a young person under the age of 18 years. So there was still nothing to stress over when she posted 18.^
That may be the case, I just would like to see people not get in trouble sending their picture to a 18 year old to purchase sex. I could care less what you or her think but I do want to keep the police interest in this hobby to a minimum.
Maybe this time it's a real girl with a smoking bod, next time it's not?
By the way she changed to 19 after I posted so now pooners have a little less to stress over.
I'll look forward to your future contributions.
Who said anything about operating under his standard? It's a smart and logical suggestion given the legal situation. She was originally posting as 18 and asking for a face shot FFS! Even if she WAS 18, it's a major heat score. And judging by the fact that she changed her age to 19 now, raises even more alarm bells.The provider can choose how they want to conduct their business and she has the right to refuse service. Poonertime, if you do not agree with her terms you are free to shop else where. By no means should she be required to operate under your standards. Judging by her pics, she wont suffer because you're not calling.
My understanding was 18 no, 19 yes, if that is wrong so be it. I'm not interested in having a debate with you either way. What I do know is the mods pulled the 18 y/o review and this one remains. Decide for yourself.It is against the law for anyone to offer or obtain the sexual services of a young person under the age of 18 years. So there was still nothing to stress over when she posted 18.
There lies the problem. you're in here thinking with your big head lmaoMy understanding was 18 no, 19 yes, if that is wrong so be it. I'm not interested in having a debate with you either way. What I do know is the mods pulled the 18 y/o review and this one remains. Decide for yourself.
