For the third time I have now received an e-mail about "workplace violence" and escorts.. and given some of the reading I've been doing about rhetoric in the last couple of years it has given me pause for thought.
1) Is high end escorting dangerous enough compared to frequently dating men (or women) off of the internet sites like plenty of fish that it deserves so much more focus than these other types of semi-anonymous dating?
2) Given what I've read and heard about clients experiencing violence and/or abuse from escorts... why the heck isn't anyone setting up websites and statistics for them? Escorts are able to contribute stats anonymously, so it isn't as though clients couldn't do the same if someone were to want to contribute their own experiences without wanting to be exposed?
3) Is constantly looking at the issue of workplace violence and escorts actually making it more dangerous for escorts? A society that believes violence is common and frequently experienced by escorts due to their constantly being exposed to the issue is going to have a higher tolerance for these situations occurring, is it not?
I just think if we are going to talk about this matter, we should be considering how best to do it (anyone that knows me knows I am not one for shoving any topic under the rug, but I don't like talking about serious issues just to talk about them) I also see the need for more clarification between survival and street sex workers and high end escorting. I'm sorry if that distinction is offensive to anyone, I'm not saying there is a difference in deserving when it comes to the type of woman that does this work (Any "high end" escort could be a rent payment away from becoming a survival sex worker for all the uninformed observer knows) but I think there is a very different potential for harm given the process of client selection and safety network they are often able to make use of.
quickly, a little background: In the two years I spent as an escort I never once experienced any form or violence or abuse from a client. I was told I was very lucky. I accept that given the statistics this was partially the case but I also made some very specific decisions about the way I made myself available to clients that I believe helped me steer clear of harmful situations. This in no way is meant to imply that I feel that anyone who has experienced violence and/or abuse (emotional or otherwise) did something wrong
now here's what I've been wondering.. would it make a difference if we dropped the focus on violence and turned it into a focus on safety even in the language we use when it comes to concerns in the escorting industry? Would a safety network that was easier to access and more actively maintained and circulated online be more helpful to certain types of sex workers (I think I am referring primarily to those that are considered "high end" sex workers) than websites that look for statistics and personal experiences of violence not do more to keep women from experiencing these situations?
oh, and happy Friday folks!
1) Is high end escorting dangerous enough compared to frequently dating men (or women) off of the internet sites like plenty of fish that it deserves so much more focus than these other types of semi-anonymous dating?
2) Given what I've read and heard about clients experiencing violence and/or abuse from escorts... why the heck isn't anyone setting up websites and statistics for them? Escorts are able to contribute stats anonymously, so it isn't as though clients couldn't do the same if someone were to want to contribute their own experiences without wanting to be exposed?
3) Is constantly looking at the issue of workplace violence and escorts actually making it more dangerous for escorts? A society that believes violence is common and frequently experienced by escorts due to their constantly being exposed to the issue is going to have a higher tolerance for these situations occurring, is it not?
I just think if we are going to talk about this matter, we should be considering how best to do it (anyone that knows me knows I am not one for shoving any topic under the rug, but I don't like talking about serious issues just to talk about them) I also see the need for more clarification between survival and street sex workers and high end escorting. I'm sorry if that distinction is offensive to anyone, I'm not saying there is a difference in deserving when it comes to the type of woman that does this work (Any "high end" escort could be a rent payment away from becoming a survival sex worker for all the uninformed observer knows) but I think there is a very different potential for harm given the process of client selection and safety network they are often able to make use of.
quickly, a little background: In the two years I spent as an escort I never once experienced any form or violence or abuse from a client. I was told I was very lucky. I accept that given the statistics this was partially the case but I also made some very specific decisions about the way I made myself available to clients that I believe helped me steer clear of harmful situations. This in no way is meant to imply that I feel that anyone who has experienced violence and/or abuse (emotional or otherwise) did something wrong
now here's what I've been wondering.. would it make a difference if we dropped the focus on violence and turned it into a focus on safety even in the language we use when it comes to concerns in the escorting industry? Would a safety network that was easier to access and more actively maintained and circulated online be more helpful to certain types of sex workers (I think I am referring primarily to those that are considered "high end" sex workers) than websites that look for statistics and personal experiences of violence not do more to keep women from experiencing these situations?
oh, and happy Friday folks!






