Joys & pitfalls of group sex—feel free to disagree

tantalizeme

wolf in sheep's clothing
Oct 5, 2007
1,512
13
38
This topic is very much on my mind these days. And, judging from a recent poll, there's interest in group sex among pooners.

Of course, one-on-one encounters remain the bread-and-butter of my sex life. But, for variety, I also like occasional (hetero) 3-ways or 4-ways. As for bi-sex activities with other males, I sure wish I'd enjoy them too—but alas, not my thing.

For those wanting to compare notes, here’s my experience of the pros and cons of various types of group sex.

1. MFF 3-ways (me + 2 ladies): Almost every guy’s fantasy, due to the powerful ego strokes. Easy to arrange with SPs, at double the cost for a given time frame. Judging from reviews, all elite Western SPs, though not all Asians, demand a condom change for any pussy switch between girls.

My few MFF 3-ways have all been with civilians, because with SPs the cost-benefit ratio just isn’t right for me. I don’t like to have to work hard during sex. MFF 3-ways leave me feeling vaguely inadequate about not having enough libidinal stamina—at this mature life stage—to keep two girls occupied and satisfied.

This wouldn’t be a problem with bisexual girls, and many guys love watching girl-on-girl play. There's a lot of this at swinger clubs. Personally, I don’t get much out of it, and sometimes it makes me feel left out.

2. MMF 3-ways (me, a buddy + 1 lady): I admire SPs who offer this service. I’ve experienced only three of these with SPs so far—Erotic Christine, Ava and Tracy (the latter two were Maggie girls).

With us guys sharing a girl, I had hoped for a reduced donation—but no, you pay the same as if you had the girl all to yourself. As Maggie explained, "It's a lot of work for the girl."

I’ve also done MMF 3-ways at swinger parties with GFs; there're always lots of guys around eager to leech off another couple. I eased my current GF into swinging by first asking a male acquaintance—an A1 lover—to help me free her from the culturally implanted monogamist mindset.

The highpoint of any MMF 3-way is, of course, DP. To my mind, an SP who doesn’t offer DP might as well not bother offering MMF 3-ways. But a steamy DP isn’t as straightforward as it looks in porn (partly because of the need for condoms in real life).

Even if attempts at DP fail, some guys like me find something delightfully naughty about taking turns drilling an SP’s orifices. MMF 3-ways go best when your pooning buddy is a super-mellow fellow, and the girl is a hottie. (Otherwise, it can be like pulling teeth, except less fun.)

3. MMFF 4-ways (Me, a buddy + 2 ladies): This is my favorite setup. Not many SPs offer this, or at least they don’t advertise it—because the demand is small, or possibly for security reasons. With SPs I’ve had only two 4-ways so far, with Tracy & Cherry last year and Sabrina & Kelly last week (all Maggie girls).

Asian SPs are rarely interested in playing with each other—fine by me. The important thing for me is, I managed to make Greek happen both times with one of the girls.

I’ve had quite a few MMFF 4-ways at swinger parties, where a surprising number of ladies are bisexual.

When reasonably congenial couples swap partners, the resulting 4-way offers intriguing possibilities which one-on-one sex just doesn’t—e.g. stimulating visuals of the couple next to you; the sweet pain of seeing your partner ravaged by another guy; body parts intertwined in surprising ways; or multiple forms of penetrative combinations.

4. Gangbangs (defined here as: one or more ladies, each of whom is banged by at least 3 guys): Places in Europe hire SPs for this—but it’s rare in Vancouver (though apparently Vanesssa organized a gangbang when I was out of town last fall).

When I asked a former GF about her sexual fantasies, nothing much was forthcoming—until, one day, she told me of her desire to hold two guys’ cocks while a third was banging her. Turned out to be ridiculously easy to make this fantasy come true.:)

But I don’t feel overly enthusiastic about a sausage fest where I’m waiting with other guys for a lady’s orifice to become available. Though there’s something titillating about gangbangs, they’re really just physical release, though still way better than no sex at all.

5. Orgies with 5 or more people & a more or less balanced M/F ratio: A few times I’ve experienced amazingly steamy play in open rooms at swinger clubs (like New Horizons in Everett), though even in these settings most women are still quite picky about who gets to touch them.

I actually enjoy doing MMFF or MMMFFF play in open rooms with lots of other copulating couples, because this provides stimulating sounds and visuals.

In the play-for-pay world, however, orgies don’t really get off the ground, at least not in Canada (one good reason to move to Europe).

6. BDSM parties: A very different kettle of fish. There’re lots of those around town, but S&M parties without penetrative fun don’t interest me much. Generally, I like to act as the top rather than the bottom, the whipper rather than the whippee, though I’m easy either way.

Professional domes generally don’t fuck, so personally I don’t care for them (though I appreciate the important work they do). I adore pretty, submissive girls with a true masochistic streak—though my own kinky tendencies are mild by www.kink.com standards. But that’s another topic.

I still wonder: do many SPs receive requests for group activities involving more than 1 guy? Are these requests mostly hetero in nature or are bi-sex fantasies also common among guys? The potential interest is surely there—yet one practically never hears about this on the Boards.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,171
1,184
113
Upstairs
What is this, like the 3rd or 4th thread you've started on group sex?

Okay, we get it - you like group sex.

Looks like you're trying too hard to convince yourself of something.
 

lenny

girls just wanna have fu
May 20, 2004
4,088
76
48
your GF's panties
What is this, like the 3rd or 4th thread you've started on group sex?

Okay, we get it - you like group sex.

Looks like you're trying too hard to convince yourself of something.
Don't worry, CT, reading the words "group sex" in a couple thread titles won't make you "gay".

Feel free to enjoy 100's of other topics in the Lounge.
 

Popoff

Member
Apr 5, 2011
186
0
16
Tantalizeme sounds like your living life to its fullest, many of your adventures are over the top. Some of your ideas sound like fun, however two guys and only one girl might be a bit too close for most of us.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,652
839
113
What is this, like the 3rd or 4th thread you've started on group sex?

Okay, we get it - you like group sex.

Looks like you're trying too hard to convince yourself of something.
.....or he's advertising the fact that he'd like to get in contact with/be contacted by, others that are like minded.
 
Vancouver Escorts