Not trying to be a jerk, and she is not on my to do list, but is she still a non-FS provider? She does not specify non-FS, and advertises in the Escorts area still. Nothing wrong with being non-FS, many, many independent providers are such, and are very upfront about it, preventing any misunderstandings. And non-FS providers generally do not advertise in the Escorts section of LL, and if they do, they state explicitly "Non-FS" and even lines like "boundry pushers will be blocked". I really hope she doesn't end up getting herself in trouble with a client that pay's her minimum spend expecting FS and when the time comes, finds out its not on the menu.