Is this offensive?

[kylle]

I recently sent an email to Fantasy City asking about McKenna. I was interested in seeing her and I wanted a little more info than was offered on their website.


So I wrote this email:


On Thu Jun 8 1:26 , 'kyle kelly' <kyle007kelly@hotmail.com> sent:


Hi Scarlet,

I am interested in seeing McKenna this friday, and I had a few questions.

Does she accept oral?
Does she or do any of the girls do duos?
Does she allow multiple "releases" in a one hour session?


I was thinking about 6 or 7 p.m. on friday. at an incall location if
available.

Let me know,

Thanks

Kyle



And got this response:

From : Fantasy City <scarlet@fantasycity.net>
Reply-To : scarlet@fantasycity.net
Sent : Thursday, June 8, 2006 10:41 AM
To : 'kyle kelly' <kyle007kelly@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: info


Are you fucking kidding me???

Never write to me again!




Was I out of line? I have written similar emails to similar places and generally they respond with a "yes" or a "no". Then I make an appointment to see this or that person and so on...

I'm not sure what she took offense to...

Kyle

 

[SoftHandsAnne]

?? It's a puzzle to me too... In my experience, those seem like pretty "normal" questions. Hopefully someone from there is reading and can clarify.

 

[metoo113]

I would say that the post was a little toooooooo sexually explicit!!!

Keep it in the realm of safety as far as LE goes.

 

[NORMNORM]

I don't think that is too sexually explicit.
You are writing to a go-between; not the actual service provider.
What I do think is that Scarlet is one rude, unprofesssional beeatch that I certainly won't be contacting.

Norm

 

[Avery]

Instead of asking questions, tell them what you like to do (in polite, not-too-explicit terms). Say that if that's a problem with your first choice, ask them to suggest someone else. That's been my approach with agencies and indies in Montreal and Toronto, and I've always received a polite, positive response.

Mind you, agencies in Western Canada seem to be far touchier about these things than those in Eastern Canada. There are many agencies in Montreal that will openly discuss things like DFK and BBBJ on the phone with potential clients.

 

[Guardian Angel]

Asking questions over e-mail

I would say that the post was a little toooooooo sexually explicit!!!

Keep it in the realm of safety as far as LE goes.

Good question and the answers vary from no prob to watch for LE.

Personally I suspect with all the Vice out there looking for Sex trade illegal practices, it would be dangerous to answer questions that direct if it happened to be the vice squad doing a little homework. I am not totally familiar with what Escorts or Massage Parlors can say or do to get around the leagal issues, but I would suspect there may be some code or signs that make SP's be cautious about what info they provide and what media is being used.

As for the comments, I think a nice "Sorry I am not able to provide that info over the phone, e-mail - whatever" would ahve sufficed.

G.A.

 

[Avery]

I would say that the post was a little toooooooo sexually explicit!!!

I don't agree at all. And, to get back to kylle's question (Is this offensive?), the only thing that was offensive was the response he received from the agency. If they're that touchy about questions concerning sexual activity, all they had to do was reply politely that they don't answer that type of question.

P.S. I just checked the web site out. The agency is in Seattle, not Vancouver, as I first thought. They're much more careful in the USA about referring to sexual activity. Nevertheless, for all their pretention on their web site as to class, their response was classless.

 

[LonelyGhost]

that response was just plain rude.

 

[LonelyGhost]

Be nice and respectful and it will get you a long way...

but it goes both ways, n'est pas?

 

[sirlickheralot]

Her response was over the line, a simple I don't respond to questions of a sexual nature would have sufficed. However this is a US agency where they have to be very wary of entrapment from LE Nazis so I'm not too suprised she wouldn't answer questions of a sexual nature from someone she doesn't know (I'm assuming you haven't used this agency before). When dealing with US agencies you may want to be more discrete until you have established a relationship with them or provided them with references so they know they aren't dealing with LE.

 

[Chantal]

Personally?

She or the agency lost out on a client (sad to say ,but true)I have had more explicit e-mails than this one,if I choose to respond I do, if not F*** Y**.If a client is wanting to see his girl,and he needs to know the answers to his questions.A SP is running her business or the agency I do not know how reputable the latter was?Was the response offensive(yes)I agree,and if the agency is using profanity in replying to an e-mail it's unacceptable "Poor Business Ethics".

 

[Smother]

I don't think it's rude at all......if your paying for something.....a client or potential client has the right to ask .... you wanna know what your getting....how many reviews on here have we read ...." not what she seems" ....or service was the opposite from what was advertised!! I've read a few of those.....
It's not rude at all if your asking what's offered in terms of service.....in polite and respectful words that is....

But in the original post.....i don't think it's rude.....also ....i've pm'd sp's similair sort of questions.....not anal questions....all responded nicely......

Wonder if she was having a bad day or moment!!!

 

[westwoody]

One issue is that the communication was between the agency and the customer, instead of a prostitute and her customer. Since the request was about specific sexual acts the agency, by agreeing to them, could be charged with procuring.

 

[Avery]

One issue is that the communication was between the agency and the customer, instead of a prostitute and her customer. Since the request was about specific sexual acts the agency, by agreeing to them, could be charged with procuring.

As I discovered by checking the agency's web site, it's located in Seattle, so everyone would be committing an illegal act, unlike Canada where only the agency could be charged. However, that still doesn't excuse the agency for their rude reply.

 

[visioneast]

Hi kylle, I don't think it is offensive.

I think that SP overreacted...

 

[HankQuinlan]

American agencies (and indies) almost always have a disclaimer saying that explicit questions will be ignored. They request that no conversation take place as what specifically one would get for the "donation". They also require references before they will accept appointments.

Your questions could (mostly) have been answered by searching for the lady in question on thereviewboard.net (the board for Seattle). The review boards always have a disclaimer that all reviews should be regarded as "fiction" (which of course, some of them are), and the theory is that no SP can be held liable for something an anonymous person writes. The Law there does expend resources trapping SPs, and the ladies have to be careful.

Her response was unnecessarily rude, however, but you would not have received an answer. What is reasonable here is not reasonable in "the land of the free."