IB'S Chelsea

[pussy lover]

Okay, I decided to toftt on this new gal. I had called IB and they told me here measurements...I thought wow, this is tight!!!

So I got there and was greeted a a girl of short stature..4'9" roughly... and we proceeded to go upstairs.

My initial impressement...not to be mean..was hmmm..did not appear to by a short young gal, but rather than a dwarfish older gal. I don't know what it was, but she kind of reminded me of a "midget" stripper that was at monte's a few years back.

Her blonde hair was tied up back which made her even look more uptight...esp when she seemed to have a "permanent" frown on her face.

She proceeded to take her clothes off and I thought that...remember...it must be tight.

Anyways, her butt is okay, breasts were fairly nice, but for someone so petit ( 20 ") waist, her stomach was a little flabby which seemed to imply post-partum.

The massage was weak and there was no cbj at all. Cg was unimpressive and did not last very long as she preferred mish. Lfk was definately not on the menu so and again she seemed pretty closed minded so I didn't bother with daty.

In under one min she wanted me to "finish" already..( i thougth i still had over 20 mins left??). Needless to say, I felt quite rushed and lost interest and the session ended in about 15 minutes total with a hj to finish.

At times, on mish, she seemed pretty and young-ish, at other times she seem uptight and older. So I will refrain on guessing her age.

Overall, I would not repeat.

As for ratings...l/a/s= 6/2/2

I understand she is new to the biz so maybe she needs time to "loosen up"...but it won't be with me...b/c there is so much more to choose from.

 

[planetsmurf]

thanks for the review i was looking to book an appt soon with her because i like small sp's but after your review i will take my business elsewhere

 

[bambi]

Well that sucks that you didnt have a good time with chelsea, but keep in mind she is new and needs to be shown the ropes a bit. And i can assure you she is not a day over 20....lol..gawd she is younger than me (i wonder if i look old at 21)
I think chelsea is cute and tiny but i guess too each his own!!

xox Anita cox

 

[Mr. Monday]

I'd have to see Chelsea to confirm this but she sounds like Cindy, formerly of E&R. There are a couple of mediocre reviews of Cindy on line including one from me. If Chelsea is not Cindy perhaps someone can clarify that.

M

 

[bambi]

yes she is cindy from ER

 

[pussy lover]

if chelsea is formerly cindy from ER, then she is not that new is she?? and doesn't have to be shown the ropes.

 

[bambi]

well she has not worked more that 3 weeks total so yes i would say she is new and needs to be shown the ropes

 

[BouBou]

PL's description is also very similar to an SP that worked for a very short while at SU. Her name was Olivia. If I remember correctly, she said that she had worked at ER, so I'm confident that it's the same person. I would have been upset over the encounter, except that she was the tiniest lady that I had ever been with, so it wasn't a total loss as I really, really like petite.

 

[ariesram]

I'll second that

I had a session with her once too, under the name on Cindy at E.R. It was definetly nothing to write home about either. That was about a year ago too, so 'learning the ropes' doesn't really come into play here I'm afraid. She was pleasant enough, but the service was very businesslike and about as exciting as cleaning my kitchen. L:6.5 A:7 S:6.