I-N: Sexy 34d Claudia is back !!!!
- Thread starter i-n
- Start date
Well, obviously Demarco doesn't mind a little fat
wolverine said:"3 days" is considered old for reviews??
Can someone really gain 40 lbs within 3 days??
I'm not physically perfect, so if a lady is "real" too then fine.
This thread has turned into complete bullshit. We in Calgary have been bitching for years about barbie dolls with crap service, so we finally get an organization with good service and we turn on it too.
I will take a slightly imperfect girl with great service than a physically perfect girl who thinks all she has to do is show up. Go to Kate's if you want that.
This thread has turned into complete bullshit. We in Calgary have been bitching for years about barbie dolls with crap service, so we finally get an organization with good service and we turn on it too.
I will take a slightly imperfect girl with great service than a physically perfect girl who thinks all she has to do is show up. Go to Kate's if you want that.
I'll have to disagree with you heartily there...Funloverking said:
I also saw her both times - the second time, I do not think she looked "night and day" different. Was she bigger? Yeah, but very slightly, IMO. Still a killer body, and that supposed extra weight did not make her butt any less gorgeous, and she was not, in any way, flabby or chubby, or anything of that nature.
I am seeing Claudia tonight....I will post my thoughts later.
Granted 115 lbs is likely a stretch - but sounds like these guys prefer their gals very thin - so take that into account, IMO, when considering their version of "fat" or "chubby".
Not challenging anyone's honesty - but everyone has to realize differences in perception and tastes come into play here.
Me sick bastard?JohnnyLee said:Is that what you did to your fatty mom d_Duck55, you sick BASTARD
Since this thread is going down the shitter: JohnnyLee where the f##k did you come up with that one? Little Johnny (and I mean little) it sounds like you have some kind of Freudian / Oedipus brainfart happening. Good luck with the small penis! And I like how you signed off with that red faced slant eyed guy. Cool.
Have to agree there...Captain Canuck said:
Given the virtual lack of decent gals here - we should be thankful. The worst of my I-N experiences still outrank anything (other than my lovely DAISY) else here.
Sigh, I really didn't want this to become a bashing thread. All I'm asking for is accurate stats.
I think it's not good etiquette for those of you that are making comments without having seen Claudia this time around.
Chief, please give your comments after you have seen her tonight.
I think it's not good etiquette for those of you that are making comments without having seen Claudia this time around.
Chief, please give your comments after you have seen her tonight.
chiefwiggum said:
Okay, here's the lowdown...
She does look a little bigger than the time I saw her back in the spring, but I did not find her to be "fat".
She still has a good waist/hip ratio, has more of an hourglass figure than anything else. No "gut", no rolls, no major sag on her ass, and she's still a cutie. And what a rack....
If you are the type of guy that prefers the ultra-thin model types, do not see her. She is more "average" body type, but very feminine and nowhere near being "fat".
In the end, her services are excellent, a full GFE, which is what counts.
Having said all that, I have to agree that her website pics perhaps need to be updated - and certainly her stats need to be a little less "doctored". For guys dropping a trio of browns, it's only fair. The pics appear to underestimate her overall size - on the upside, they also underestimate her breast size
She does look a little bigger than the time I saw her back in the spring, but I did not find her to be "fat".
She still has a good waist/hip ratio, has more of an hourglass figure than anything else. No "gut", no rolls, no major sag on her ass, and she's still a cutie. And what a rack....
If you are the type of guy that prefers the ultra-thin model types, do not see her. She is more "average" body type, but very feminine and nowhere near being "fat".
In the end, her services are excellent, a full GFE, which is what counts.
Having said all that, I have to agree that her website pics perhaps need to be updated - and certainly her stats need to be a little less "doctored". For guys dropping a trio of browns, it's only fair. The pics appear to underestimate her overall size - on the upside, they also underestimate her breast size
Average women for Canadian / US standards = slightly overweight.chiefwiggum said:
I'm glad you enjoyed yourself with an "average" woman. Like I said, if you like women with a little meat, she's excellent. Great service.
I personally would never pay 3 browns for an average woman.
I had a similar experience the last time she was here that she does appear bigger than her pictures. I would say that she has a few extra pounds, not fat, but certainly a litlle chubby compared to what I thought she would look like from the photos.chiefwiggum said:Okay, here's the lowdown...
She does look a little bigger than the time I saw her back in the spring, but I did not find her to be "fat".
She still has a good waist/hip ratio, has more of an hourglass figure than anything else. No "gut", no rolls, no major sag on her ass, and she's still a cutie. And what a rack....
If you are the type of guy that prefers the ultra-thin model types, do not see her. She is more "average" body type, but very feminine and nowhere near being "fat".
In the end, her services are excellent, a full GFE, which is what counts.
Having said all that, I have to agree that her website pics perhaps need to be updated - and certainly her stats need to be a little less "doctored". For guys dropping a trio of browns, it's only fair. The pics appear to underestimate her overall size - on the upside, they also underestimate her breast size
It does seems that all their models are "36-24-36" on the site which is very deceptive. When they do that, then it does not allow us to make an educated decision whether we want to see them. Personally, I prefer spinners and Claudia does not fit into that category. She was a fun girl and I had a good time as she does have a fun personality, but would not see her again as she is not my type. I look at the bright side, that at least she has a fun personality, unlike Ashley who has a hot body but really crappy attitude and service.
I wasn't overly thrilled with Claudia's size, but I just decided to see her anyways since I was already there. In the future, I will probably just refuse the date if it isn't as "advertised". I agree with Funloverking that if I am paying money, I would want the "hot" girl not an "average girl".
The funny thing is that when I saw Sara the first time she was here, she was thinner than old pictures and it did not do her justice. I told her she should retake her photos and her current ones look way better. Hands down, I think Niki was probably the best so far. Tight sexy little thing. Send Niki and Sara back !!!!!
Last edited:
Instead of these "measurements", maybe a more accurate description would solve alot of the complaints. Current photos would be nice. Put them in bikini shots so we can see what they really look like as we are going to see them with less than that. Giving inaccurate descriptions only ends up disappointing people and soon you'll have them cancelling their appointments after they get there, so both parties lose. The guy goes away unhappy and the girls lose an appointment time that could have been given to someone else. I was disappointed in her body, but she made up for it in personality, but if I had an educated choice, I probably would not have seen her.i-n said:
Just send Niki and Sara back and we can kiss and make up !
Send Niki back
Sorry to hijack the thread; since Maxine seems to be paying attention to this thread, here's another vote for Niki !
D
Sorry to hijack the thread; since Maxine seems to be paying attention to this thread, here's another vote for Niki !
D
a recent webcam pic
If they could provide a pic not more than a few days old before they travel is not so difficult to provide and we all could judge it if it was done with some care
We will always have differing opinions but a guaranteed recent pic helps
If they could provide a pic not more than a few days old before they travel is not so difficult to provide and we all could judge it if it was done with some care
We will always have differing opinions but a guaranteed recent pic helps
Sorry guys for the trouble I may have caused with the posts. I think we've said enough and everyone is still free to their own opinions.
I checked her out. After all the commotion I was curious to see what she looked like.
She looked great. True, she is "curvy" and somewhat well padded. I would say 5'4 and 130lbs. But she had a VERY nice body, not a roll or sag or cellulite anywhere. Good waist to hip ratio which is what counts. And her breasts ... wow ... like I-N said, you don't get boobies like those on a skinny girl. And really soft skin. Oh and a few strategic piercings.
I would say L/A/S/ 8/9/9. I thought her face was a 7 at first, but her charming personality moved it up a bit. She is skillful at all the various acronyms so I will skip those in this review. Definitely good VFM.
Yeah, the whiners all want a 10/10/10 but how often do you find one?
She looked great. True, she is "curvy" and somewhat well padded. I would say 5'4 and 130lbs. But she had a VERY nice body, not a roll or sag or cellulite anywhere. Good waist to hip ratio which is what counts. And her breasts ... wow ... like I-N said, you don't get boobies like those on a skinny girl. And really soft skin. Oh and a few strategic piercings.
I would say L/A/S/ 8/9/9. I thought her face was a 7 at first, but her charming personality moved it up a bit. She is skillful at all the various acronyms so I will skip those in this review. Definitely good VFM.
Yeah, the whiners all want a 10/10/10
but how often do you find one?I think you are missing the point. We all have our own preferences which is fine, but we should at least know what we paying for. In the end, it only pisses the client off and then he no longer uses IN at all as they don't trust the information being given.d_Duck55 said:I checked her out. After all the commotion I was curious to see what she looked like.
She looked great. True, she is "curvy" and somewhat well padded. I would say 5'4 and 130lbs. But she had a VERY nice body, not a roll or sag or cellulite anywhere. Good waist to hip ratio which is what counts. And her breasts ... wow ... like I-N said, you don't get boobies like those on a skinny girl. And really soft skin. Oh and a few strategic piercings.
I would say L/A/S/ 8/9/9. I thought her face was a 7 at first, but her charming personality moved it up a bit. She is skillful at all the various acronyms so I will skip those in this review. Definitely good VFM.
Yeah, the whiners all want a 10/10/10
If you like curvy girls, then she would be perfect for you. Maybe you hate spinners, who knows. But you should get what you want and like. If I order a steak, I expect a steak. If I order a hamburger, I expect a hamburger. Plain and simple ! If a place does not give me what I order or "trick" me into believing that is what I ordered, I am going to be pissed and not come back. Accurate photos will allow the people to make a choice based on their preference whether it is a spinner, curvy or heavy girls, etc.
Review
So I saw Claudia on Thursday afternoon and I'm glad I didn't read the reviews before going in. I wasn't avoiding reviews on purpose - it just works out that I haven't been to perb in a week. I don't see many girls, so it doesn't usually take much to talk myself out of making an appointment.
I hadn't seen Claudia previously, so I can't make any direct comparisons to her appearances on previous trips. What she looked like a few months ago, I have no idea.
I can comment on what she looks like now. I have to agree with d_duck ... she's not a spinner, but you don't find too many spinners with a chest like hers. I would agree that she is "curvy" ... but definitely NOT fat or overweight. She has a three piercings, and chances are you'll get to play with all of them at some point during the service. She has a GREAT smile - you feel comfortable when you walk through the door.
The menu is very similar to what you get from other IN girls (from previous reviews) - I had only seen Adrienne from IN before Claudia. Compared to what we have in Calgary to draw comparisons with, she is definitely way above average.
L/A/S - 8/10/10 ... I had a great time.
So I saw Claudia on Thursday afternoon and I'm glad I didn't read the reviews before going in. I wasn't avoiding reviews on purpose - it just works out that I haven't been to perb in a week. I don't see many girls, so it doesn't usually take much to talk myself out of making an appointment.
I hadn't seen Claudia previously, so I can't make any direct comparisons to her appearances on previous trips. What she looked like a few months ago, I have no idea.
I can comment on what she looks like now. I have to agree with d_duck ... she's not a spinner, but you don't find too many spinners with a chest like hers. I would agree that she is "curvy" ... but definitely NOT fat or overweight. She has a three piercings, and chances are you'll get to play with all of them at some point during the service. She has a GREAT smile - you feel comfortable when you walk through the door.
The menu is very similar to what you get from other IN girls (from previous reviews) - I had only seen Adrienne from IN before Claudia. Compared to what we have in Calgary to draw comparisons with, she is definitely way above average.
L/A/S - 8/10/10 ... I had a great time.
