The Porn Dude

How To Beat The Canucks

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
4,943
849
113
Upstairs
In case any NHL coaches read perb I thought I'd offer 10 suggestions of how to beat the Canucks in the playoffs.
-------------------

1. ferocious forechecking. The Canucks are given way too much time to set up. Rush them and they make mistakes.

2. Don't take stupid penalties. The strong Canuck PP will kill, even with tighter playoff checking.

3. Don't let the Sedins set up behind the net. gretzky was the king of setting up "in the office" behind the net, but The Sedins are also given too much space and time back there.

4. Stop the first line and you negate 80% of the Canucks scoring threat. Easier said than done, but Burrows is weak, so it's just The Sedins and defencemen stepping up yu really have to worry about.

5. More traffic in front of Luongo. With the nets being so small relative to the giant goalies like Luongo you are essentially trying to score against a plywood board with a couple of holes in it. The bigger goalies barely have to move. Screening and tips are the best way to score.

6.Getting Luongo off his game. Again, standing on him and blocking im, but without taking penalties. Degree of difficulty - 9.2.

7. Goad the dummies - draw retaliation penalties from the dumber players like Burrows, Lapierre and Samuelsson.

8. Stretch passes. Chicago has killed the Canucks with break-out strtch passes.

9. Adjusting during the game. depending on the team, the edge should usually go to the opponent. Vigneault has been outcoached every playoff series.

10. Hit the Bastards - This is the big one. The Caucks aren't big or tough. Pounding them tenderizes them. Again, the trick is not to take dumb penalties, but in the playoffs there is usually more tolerance and fewer calls.
 

manni

Well-known member
Apr 14, 2006
1,306
78
48



Cock Throppled has not made any friends yet - Wow really 1,500 posts no friends eh.. can't figure out why....lol!

badgerjohn, you are the man!

very astute! and I was about to answer cockwhisperers manifesto with similar sentiments.
(you've stated a concise and clear rationale and therefore need not repeating…though I would also like to add 'chemistry' or 'team character' into that mix)

not sure what the Canucks did to this guy but clearly he's a disciple of the much laughed at BJH and we all know what happened to him.

yup…Canucks will take the West.

enjoy the playoffs everyone.
 

manni

Well-known member
Apr 14, 2006
1,306
78
48
In case any NHL coaches read perb I thought I'd offer 10 suggestions of how to beat the Canucks in the playoffs.
-------------------

1. ferocious forechecking. The Canucks are given way too much time to set up. Rush them and they make mistakes.

2. Don't take stupid penalties. The strong Canuck PP will kill, even with tighter playoff checking.

3. Don't let the Sedins set up behind the net. gretzky was the king of setting up "in the office" behind the net, but The Sedins are also given too much space and time back there.

4. Stop the first line and you negate 80% of the Canucks scoring threat. Easier said than done, but Burrows is weak, so it's just The Sedins and defencemen stepping up yu really have to worry about.

5. More traffic in front of Luongo. With the nets being so small relative to the giant goalies like Luongo you are essentially trying to score against a plywood board with a couple of holes in it. The bigger goalies barely have to move. Screening and tips are the best way to score.

6.Getting Luongo off his game. Again, standing on him and blocking im, but without taking penalties. Degree of difficulty - 9.2.

7. Goad the dummies - draw retaliation penalties from the dumber players like Burrows, Lapierre and Samuelsson.

8. Stretch passes. Chicago has killed the Canucks with break-out strtch passes.

9. Adjusting during the game. depending on the team, the edge should usually go to the opponent. Vigneault has been outcoached every playoff series.

10. Hit the Bastards - This is the big one. The Caucks aren't big or tough. Pounding them tenderizes them. Again, the trick is not to take dumb penalties, but in the playoffs there is usually more tolerance and fewer calls.


cockwhisperer,
you and 29 other teams had an 82 game time-frame. not really panning out is it?
I guess I'll give you the Jack Adams Award. LOL!!!!!!

Items 3 and 10…priceless!

anyway, just enjoy the playoffs and give the Canucks a much deserved standing ovation already!
We Are All Canucks.

have a nice weekend.
 

87112

Banned
Dec 13, 2004
3,692
673
113
*&^%
If they play the Ducks in the 1st round and Jonas Hilner gets back to form watch out. In 2009 Hilner stole an entire series when the Ducks beat the #1 seeded Sharks in 6 games. It could repeat itself soon.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
4,943
849
113
Upstairs
You guys can wish all you want, but the playoffs are a whole different ball game. Just ask The Washington Capitals.

My arguments stand. The playoffs allow more hitting, the checking gets much tighter and there are fewer calls. If Torres, Ballard, Hamhuis, Bieksa, Oreskovich, Lappierre and Tanner is what passes for toughness I'm surprised you didn't mention Salo and Raymond.

Sedins using the perimeter, yeah they've done wonders with that approach in past playoffs, haven't they?

Vigneault has played Kesler into exhaustion. How many of his 34 goals have been scored in the last 15 games?
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,037
44
48
If they play the Ducks in the 1st round and Jonas Hilner gets back to form watch out. In 2009 Hilner stole an entire series when the Ducks beat the #1 seeded Sharks in 6 games. It could repeat itself soon.
They also have Ray Emery to call upon, don't forget he took the Sens to the finals. If Anaheim is in the playoffs they'll be the team nobody wants to play in the first round, Canucks included.
 

AA_Train

Registered AWESOME
Jul 19, 2007
768
2
18
I love how Canuck fans think that what happens in the regular season will undoubtedly translate to the post season, 2009: Sharks first overall. Beaten by the Ducks in 6. 2010: Washington Capitals first overall. beaten by the Habs in 7. 1971: Boston Bruins first overall. Beaten by the Habs in 6 and they scored 399 goals as a team with 7 of the top 10 scorers in the league.

MATCH UPS often dictate playoff success and the Canucks face two potential very matchups that are not favourable for them. The first is Nashville. The preds can, have and will grind the Canucks down and are defensively sound. With a Vezina Trophy candidate in Pekka Rinne backstopping them, this series would be low scoring and come down to goaltending, a battle in which Luongo could lose and play very well in.

The second is Anaheim. With a first line that is physical and can explode with offense, a world class goaltender and a mean streak, it is quite conceivable that the Ducks could frustrate the Canucks the way the Blackhawks have the last couple of ears. Both these series will be tough and the Canucks could easily fall in 6 games to either opponent.

The Canucks want either Calgary or Dallas in the first round. These series have sweep potential for the Canucks as they are faster and more skilled than either team and they don't have the physicality to counter the Canucks' attack.
 

bcneil

I am from BC
Aug 24, 2007
2,097
0
0
11. Score more goals than them, if you can score more goals you will usually win.

12. Make sure they score less goals than you, then you usually win.
 

Yman

Lord Lickworthy
Jul 10, 2002
977
2
0
Vancouver
I know the majority of fans and the city wants Lord Stanley. It's all that matters to most.

I've been a fan of the Canucks for two decades. I watch every game. I'm ecstatic by their accomplishments this season. Simply amazing and so much fun. I've enjoyed the ride for the last 72 games.

I can't wait for the post season. The 2003/04 team seemed poised to take it all and they weren't this good.
 
Dec 2, 2002
3,411
5
0
Poon City
We garnered enough regular season experience but the playoffs is another different animal. The past five years ..how often have we gone past the first two rounds?

Canucks have garnered enough experience from previous years for a long run into these playoffs sorry that you're too stupid or blind to realize that...

.
 

InTheBum

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2004
3,086
83
48
We garnered enough regular season experience but the playoffs is another different animal. The past five years ..how often have we gone past the first two rounds?
I have the answer! 0
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
4,943
849
113
Upstairs
Seriously dude your unreal... get a life then get a grip.

We aren't the Washington Capitals. We have two things the caps didn't have last year. Defence and goaltending. On top of that we have scoring.. even in tight checking games.

Canucks have garnered enough experience from previous years for a long run into these playoffs sorry that you're too stupid or blind to realize that...

How many minutes in the playoffs are guys like Parros going to play off Anaheim. You don't need a knuckle dragger using 5 minutes of game time to prove how tough he is... Team toughness and grit was an issue in the off season we added to our depth and dealt with that.

Kesler had a rocket start to this year and put up some impressive numbers... He might not be scoring goals but whenever the 2nd or sometimes the third line scores.. yep #17 gets an assist. Not worried about Kesler at all.
Okay... how the Canucks do in the playoffs seems VERY important to you, so maybe getting a life might be more of a necessity for you, than me.

I agree, Luongo has played superbly lately. Can he keep it up? We'll see. Until he shows he can do it in the playoffs he's no better than Dan Cloutier, good regular season - not so much in the post season. And he may be fragile. He knows his flubs in the playoffs as well as we do. If he lets in a bad goal in the playoffs it could affect him. And your saviour then becomes Schneider - an unproven backup, who will ONLY be used in relief. No matter how badly Luongo might play Schneider will NEVER get a start in the post season.

And you do realize in the playoffs the Canucks play the Same Team every night. The Sedins have been incredibly consistent - one of them scores in just about every game, but in the playoffs their cycle game gets extra coverage and they aren't allowed the room to move and get shut down. So, if their line gets shut down the Canucks get shut down.

Kesler's points aren't coming from his linemates - they are coming on the PP and from defencemen's goals. But I did forget the Canucks have bolstered their team and all that extra scoring will be coming from Chris Higgins and Maxime Lapierre.

It's all just speculation at this point - the Canucks might sail thru the playoffs like the regular season, or they may tank. I was making some reasonable points, but you obviously have a blue whale up your ass and are more interested in insults and being a "fan" than looking at things reasonably.
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,037
44
48
I think the important thing to keep in mind is that the Stanley Cup is won or lost on the ice, not on some hooker review board:cool:.
 

ValleyGuy

Member
May 25, 2003
136
8
18
Dodge
I think the important thing to keep in mind is that the Stanley Cup is won or lost on the ice, not on some hooker review board:cool:.
That`s a great point Wilde. I would also like to add that the cup is won by the "hot" team from mid April to early June
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
4,943
849
113
Upstairs
Hmmm...okay great experts badgerjohn and manni, how do you explain things so far?

Vancouver might still pull it out in the first round, but do they really look very good? Even the first three they won weren't very convincing.

Now they have Salo and Schneider out and Luongo the head case in.
 
Dec 2, 2002
3,411
5
0
Poon City
Even if we can win a game 7...not sure we can win a 2nd round.

Hmmm...okay great experts badgerjohn and manni, how do you explain things so far?

Vancouver might still pull it out in the first round, but do they really look very good? Even the first three they won weren't very convincing.

Now they have Salo and Schneider out and Luongo the head case in.
 

manni

Well-known member
Apr 14, 2006
1,306
78
48
Hmmm...okay great experts badgerjohn and manni, how do you explain things so far?

Vancouver might still pull it out in the first round, but do they really look very good? Even the first three they won weren't very convincing.

Now they have Salo and Schneider out and Luongo the head case in.

well, don't want to use bad officiating as an excuse but Gillis made some good argument this aft.
head shot to Bieks? slashing and slewfooting Sedin? penalty shot?

I'm optimistic Vancouver will win tomorrow and this will prove to be the series that turned it around.
Game 7 at home, gotta like their chances.

I don't doubt Chicago is a good team although a dirty one. lots of cheap tactics.
they'll have what's coming to them tomorrow night because I believe the hockey gods wants the good guys to win.

and nope, I'm no hockey expert. just a fan who's stuck with the team through thick and thin.
I'll leave the 'expert' commentating to you and BJH.

GO CANUCKS GO!
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts