So in other words Miss Erica........You will accept entries from the prime young riders, as well as do an old timers event, in your Rodeo?
Age don't mean shit...
Age don't mean shit...
That's right cowboy! As far as THAT goes...I mentioned that my upper age limit is a year below that of my MUCH BELOVED father, and now can I brag on him just a bit to the golfers out there?So in other words Miss Erica........You will accept entries from the prime young riders, as well as do an old timers event, in your Rodeo?
Age don't mean shit...
THIS is a really good thoughtful response!While everyone has a right to choose who they sleep with, I think SPs should simply state that they require a text message containing age, race, height, weight and do the screening privately.
Aren't most pooners above 40 and not the best looking but have money?The title of this thread is weird.
The people that she's alienating were never a 'percentage of her potential customer base' anyways. She is specifically saying that she wants those people EXCLUDED from her customer base. The title makes it sound like she has made some grievous marketing error that's going to cause her to lose business. She doesn't want their business though. She's not losing anything.
Girls who have restrictions (age, weight, etc.) get angry messages all the time, usually along the lines of "I was going to come and see you, but I'm 70 and it looks like you're an ageist, so guess what, YOU JUST LOST A POTENTIAL CUSTOMER! HA HA! TAKE THAT!" This doesn't really make sense though, because they weren't potential customers to begin with, you know what I mean?
It's weird to me that guys get so angry about upper age limits. I think ladies with age limits are doing the older gents a favour by helping them avoid wasting their money on lackluster sessions. There are so so so many great providers who love older clients, so having honest advertisements can help older guys choose a lady that will give them the best possible encounter for their hard-earned money![]()
Definitely not. It is too bad that there's this stereotype of clients all being old/ugly/out of shape or having issues. I think this stereotype plays a role in the stigmatization of sex work, especially in the whole saviour mentality of "oh god that must be a terrible job, no woman would willingly choose to do that, ergo they must be drug addicted or trafficked, we need to save them" This is part of the mentality that leads to bills like C-36.Aren't most pooners above 40 and not the best looking but have money?
Let's be real if they were mostly Mr. GQ's and under 40 with a six pack they would be banging for free unless they have issues.
ewww, the disgusting way they say stuff, so irritating...thats why I do text-only, I can immediately pick up hints and clues when its a freshie from the way that they text, and I can just totally ignore them forever muahaha! I just don't ever respond to them and they will just keep on texting for months/years with absolutely nothing in response (and it will all go into the spam box!)Some can't read, others can but don't bother to... I still get calls from "new Canadian" EIs asking me for "sex and everything" When I get annoyed and tell them they obviously didn't read my ad which explicitly states I don't offer those services, then they admit to just looking at pics and phone number.
I agree! yesMe too! I have nothing against brown guys at all. In fact one of the hottest brown guys I've seen I'm playing with. The ones I have problems with are the first generation ESL types.
Me too !! .........And what's old? 45?
Send those 50 to "late 60s" guys THIS way...I'm a sucker for a silver fox.
I agree with the above statement.While everyone has a right to choose who they sleep with, I think SPs should simply state that they require a text message containing age, race, height, weight and do the screening privately.
I should point out though that some men will go a long way to avoid answering a direct question like "Are you aware of my restrictions? What is your ethnic background?"While everyone has a right to choose who they sleep with, I think SPs should simply state that they require a text message containing age, race, height, weight and do the screening privately.
I agree. Its less rude and it at least shows they read the ad if they supply the info.While everyone has a right to choose who they sleep with, I think SPs should simply state that they require a text message containing age, race, height, weight and do the screening privately.
save your time for proper men lolI should point out though that some men will go a long way to avoid answering a direct question like "Are you aware of my restrictions? What is your ethnic background?"






