This is true!
tonguetied said:
I do know a few people that worked for the WRHA. They told me that if you have tested positive for any of the reportable STDs (including HIV) that if you do not go back to the clinic for follow up, they can get a court order to make you get treatment. Because it is a communicable disease and by not getting treatment you are probably going to infect others.
I also know health care professionals and all say that it becomes a very intense process when a person is diagnosed positively with a transmitable disease...even an STI such as Gonnereha or however you spell it.
They insist upon you contacting the people with whom you have had sexual contact with and as well they should.
I'm sure they don't just go "Yeah, you've tested postive for HIV but don't worry, take a few monthes, relax, think about it and come back later if you feel like it and in the mean time HAPPY POONING!"
I also happen to know from having being personally tested that they ask you what your risk factors are and if you are considered "high risk". Now assuming that he was being honest with the people with whom he was tested, he would have said that he sees SWs mainly and SPs and also has outside intercourse.
In this case, although this is a point we COULD contend as us ladies know that we are tested frequently and you are very likely to contract a disease from a drunk club chickie just as much if not MORE than an SP who is regularly tested, they would have considered him high risk. There is NO WAY that the medical community would have allowed a high risk individual to get away with a possible false positive. I just don't buy that.
I know this because when I get tested I am considered "high risk" because of what I do for a profession. They are nice but they always tell me that if I ever DO test positive for HIV it is my imparitive DUTY under the law to STOP working and also contact my partners. He would have been told to get retested like in a week and to stop his activities unless he informed any of his partners of his status...period. Otherwise, this is reckless endangerment.
Testing positive for HIV is not taken lightly and there are legal ramifications for both males, females and females in this buisness especially. Something in this story just simply does not add up.
And as far as what CLM had to say, yes, its like the "6 degrees from Kevin Bacon"....we all share a common playground. It would be nice if more people were more vigilant about their testing etc. With 1/3 the population infected with the herpes virus, how many people, for example, do you think you may have slept with who have it? Its food for thought and a pretty important thought at that.
So, best of luck Poorman, but I respectfully disagree. NO happy or unhappy pooning until the final test results are in. Let's attempt to keep our playground as safe as we can although, agreed, it will never be perfect or safe 100%.