hiv infected person can be charged with attemptd murder for not disclosing hiv status
- Thread starter 420surrey
- Start date
I don't think its attempted murder, but there are a number of guys in jail now but I think the charges are assault.
So, yes, you can go to jail if you know you have it and pass it on, especially if its proven that you have it and you deny it in order to get unprotected sex from your partners. I think that someone with herpes was also charged recently, or at least his information was published as a warning since he seemed to be deliberately and maliciously seeking out unprotected sexual partners without disclosing his status.
So, yes, you can go to jail if you know you have it and pass it on, especially if its proven that you have it and you deny it in order to get unprotected sex from your partners. I think that someone with herpes was also charged recently, or at least his information was published as a warning since he seemed to be deliberately and maliciously seeking out unprotected sexual partners without disclosing his status.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_transmission_of_HIV#Canada From the link:
On 1 December 2005, Jian Ghomeshi filed a report on this issue for the CBC. He asked whether there is a legal obligation to disclose HIV status. He held up the case of Johnson Aziga, who was diagnosed in 1996 but then allegedly had unprotected sex with at least 13 women. Aziga was charged with two counts of murder and 11 counts of aggravated sexual assault; the prosecution claims that he did not disclose his status. On 4 April 2009, Aziga was found guilty of the two counts of first degree murder as well as the lesser counts. The current precedent in Canada stands as any person who has HIV, fails to disclose the fact to their sexual partner, and does not take some sort of protective measure (such as condom use), is guilty of aggravated sexual assault as per R. v. Cuerrier and subsequent cases. Aziga was convicted of first degree murder since under Canadian law, any death as a result of aggravated sexual assault (two of the women died as a result of the HIV infection received from intercourse with Aziga) is automatically first degree murder as per section 231 of the Criminal Code of Canada.[7][8]
On 1 December 2005, Jian Ghomeshi filed a report on this issue for the CBC. He asked whether there is a legal obligation to disclose HIV status. He held up the case of Johnson Aziga, who was diagnosed in 1996 but then allegedly had unprotected sex with at least 13 women. Aziga was charged with two counts of murder and 11 counts of aggravated sexual assault; the prosecution claims that he did not disclose his status. On 4 April 2009, Aziga was found guilty of the two counts of first degree murder as well as the lesser counts. The current precedent in Canada stands as any person who has HIV, fails to disclose the fact to their sexual partner, and does not take some sort of protective measure (such as condom use), is guilty of aggravated sexual assault as per R. v. Cuerrier and subsequent cases. Aziga was convicted of first degree murder since under Canadian law, any death as a result of aggravated sexual assault (two of the women died as a result of the HIV infection received from intercourse with Aziga) is automatically first degree murder as per section 231 of the Criminal Code of Canada.[7][8]
This is not necessarily the case. If the partner has indicated they have HIV, for example.
If the HIV infected uses a condom, i doubt it. Maybe a lesser charge,
if the cover failed or came off.
i knew a sex worker who was HIV pos and was sexually assaulted. this helped prove rape in her case in court because she always used condoms....always. she is my friend and i love her.please don't freak out,this is some one i know from advocacy,not anyone any of you would ever meet.
the court found him guilty based on that evidence....on a side note; guy gets HIV while raping sex worker....looks like the sex worker gets the last laugh! ha!! killed you back!!
this is a difficult disucssuion for our community but the truth is you can never be too careful!!and it is never acceptable to hurt anyone.
i knew a young man also, who had herpes. he went around fuckin women left and right unprotected in an almost malicious way...who am i kidding! it was totally malicious...anyway, he was kind of denial and i don't know... i can never understand how people treat one another...dang it!
love susieXXXO
the court found him guilty based on that evidence....on a side note; guy gets HIV while raping sex worker....looks like the sex worker gets the last laugh! ha!! killed you back!!
this is a difficult disucssuion for our community but the truth is you can never be too careful!!and it is never acceptable to hurt anyone.
i knew a young man also, who had herpes. he went around fuckin women left and right unprotected in an almost malicious way...who am i kidding! it was totally malicious...anyway, he was kind of denial and i don't know... i can never understand how people treat one another...dang it!
love susieXXXO
I was referring to the other person mentioned. So if someone has HIV but does not reveal it,
then it is not a crime to have BB sex, as long as the other person they had sex with has stated
beforehand that they have HIV, or in fact does have it, whether they know it or not.
Last edited:
What about them? What's the question?
I doubt it's anywhere near that high for HIV alone, even amongst needle using Vancouver
low track SW junkies. BTW one can get shots to protect from Hep A & B.
Last edited:
That is interesting. I know it can look like a shriveled up prune after 3 hours of nonstop loving.
While local LT SW's usually have a hard time lasting just 30 minutes, i'll be sure to keep to
29.99 minutes or less when the offer to go longer is there for a BBBJ. Then use a see through
sliding raincoat for the remaining 2 or 3 hours. Thanks for the info.
No. I think it is pretty clear that the person with HIV has to disclose the fact to their partner -- they can't just go ahead and do bb just because their partner told them that they have HIV. They too have to say it.
I am not sure what you are trying to get at with your posts. Are you trying to figure out how you can get bb activities from other people knowing that you have herpes, syphillis or HIV without having to tell your potential partner first? It kind of sounds like you are looking for an out.
It's ok tho, I think these laws only cover Canada and the US. You can feel free to spread your lovin diseases around to the bar girls in Thailand or whatever.
The exception i was referring to is a case where both partners have HIV, or at least think they do.
If each of them is infected, then what crime has been committed if they have BB sex, or how can
they cause harm to the other with regards to contracting HIV? Even if they didn't disclose their
disease to each other, i don't know how the law could punish them.
In the post to which you replied i was simply pointing out an exceptional case.
As far as i know i am presently disease free and always have been as regards STDS.
What kind of horseshit is that? That's like saying it's ok to kill someone if that someone was suicidal. Seriously dude, you are either sick or stupid. Either way, the word rational and lenny should never appear in the same sentence again.
Sorry, you lost me there. I'm guessing you don't have a degree in logic and what was stated
flew miles over the nest. But i can understand how stressed out Habs fans must be these days.
I have heard some idiotic things from you but your comments in this thread just take the cake. BTW, the Habs are on a 4 game winning streak, do a little research before you post your nonsense.
